Managing Schdeule Risk

Managing Schdeule Risk

Cost and schedule risk management must be addressed for any project to succeed. Without margin, the project schedule and cost estimates will be late and over budget before starting.

Here are some clips from a recent week-long training session on a defense program for getting the Control Account Managers up to speed on what Program Controls do while developing the Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB).

Let's start with the fundamental principle of programmatic risk management. We must clearly understand the risks and how to deal with them. This means seeking out all possible risk, from the Known obvious ones (which are likely to be issues instead of risks) to the Unknown risks. Only if the risk is Unknown do we stop searching for possible risks on mission-critical projects. If you say there are unknown unknowns, the project should have a fail-safe mode. This is usually "handled" by a cancellation and a project restart.

There are many kinds of programmatic risk, as well as all the technical risks. Seeking and managing technical risks is for another time, but here is a start on programmatic risks.

When we place these programmatic risks in the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), they look like this: This example looks at duration risk. Remember, any single point is wrong without a statement of the variance. (Hence, the single-point estimate.) Developing the upper and lower limits of the defined probability distribution is another topic. For now, let's assume we have all three pieces of information.

When we run the Monte Carlo simulator, we get outputs like this: The Probability Distribution Function (PDF) of the possible task durations generated by the Monte Carlo tool. The Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) shows the probability of completing a task "on or before" a date and its probability value.

So now we need to define a schedule margin to "protect" the deliverable. This is done by running the Monte Carlo tool with all the schedule margins removed - a zero slack deterministic schedule - and watching the desired deliverable date to see where it says the probability of completion is. In the world we work, an 80% confidence of completing "on or before" the desired date is common. The duration between the probabilistic date (80% confidence) and the deterministic date (zero slack) is the needed margin (probabilistic value) to "protect" that date.

This margin can be placed "in line." If a risk is named in the Risk Registry, Plan B for that deliverable is placed in the IMS once the Risk Management Board (RMB) accepts it. This is shown below.

When Plan B is turned to "execute," the IMS must have already planned for this, as shown above. But if the margin is not used, the risk, although planned, never comes true, and the IMS needs to absorb the unused risk margin for the future. This means moving unused margin forward. If this margin can not be moved forward, then the IMS will probably not be well structured, and some re-planning will be needed.

Here's a Compendium of Risk Management Resources

And our Risk Management book

And a collection of Risk Management briefings

Lukas A. Edwards

Civil Engineer B.Eng (Civil & Urban) Pr.Eng / Project Manager (EUP)

3d

Minor mistake in Heading.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Like
Reply
Mike Bissonette MS, MBA, PfMP

Project, Program, Portfolio Management Authority, Instructor, Best-Selling Author, Open to Consulting

1w

Glen, you need to try Chrono - an add-in to MS Project that does this with ease! We (RTConfidence) have automated it and adapted it for EVM as well using several customized Expert Systems. Let me know if you are interested. We are preparing for a major release this month.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Glen Alleman MSSM

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics