Measuring Macro Event Risks to Active Equity Portfolios

Measuring Macro Event Risks to Active Equity Portfolios

  • The tight U.S. presidential race offers a timely reminder of the risk that macro events can pose to active equity strategies.
  • Unfortunately, conventional risk modeling tools don’t offer investors much insight into portfolio-level exposures to such catalysts.
  • In this paper, we demonstrate a practical methodology to help investors measure and inform management of macro event-related risks using “winner-loser” baskets published by sell-side analysts and other subject-matter experts. 

Anticipatable macro events, such as the upcoming U.S. presidential election, can generate considerable stock market volatility and widely varying impacts over the cross section of returns. Unfortunately, while the style factors in traditional risk models pick up on changes in volatilities and correlations produced by sustained macro trends, they do not well-capture risks associated with events and other shorter-term macro phenomena. In this paper, we demonstrate a practical method to supplement the predictions of multi-factor risk models, which allows investors to measure and, therefore, to reduce equity portfolio exposures to transient macro risks.

“Winner-Loser” Baskets as Macro Event Factors

Sell-side equity analysts and other subject-matter experts often publish winner and loser stock baskets in association with upcoming macro events. These baskets represent companies that the analysts expect to outperform and underperform depending on how circumstances play out. The transmission mechanisms between events and markets may be multifaceted and complex, perhaps involving shifts in demand for products and services, new regulations, and supply-chain disruptions, just to name a few possible channels.

Typically, winner and loser baskets comprise only limited sets of companies whose linkages to an event are most apparent. Nevertheless, we can extrapolate information from even narrow selections to inform estimates of event risk across much broader investment universes. In developing confidence in the resulting predictions, what matters is the reliability of the basket as an instrument to track market expectations regarding the likelihood and consequences of the event. If we can establish that confidence based on a combination of intuition and analysis, then we can apply the long-short basket to estimate portfolios’ active exposures to the upcoming event in question.

Measuring Portfolio Sensitivity to Macroeconomic Events

We can illustrate the approach to forecasting portfolio-level macro event risk using winner-loser baskets via an example: the 2020 U.S. presidential election. 

Step 1: Choose a Winner-Loser Basket

To capture the impact of this event, Goldman Sachs created 1) the GSXUREPL Index, which consisted of 62 potential beneficiaries from a Republican policy agenda, and 2) the GSXUREPS Index, which consisted of 50 potential relative losers.

The outcome of a U.S. presidential election is likely to impact a broader universe of stocks than those companies included in such indexes, however. The stocks in these baskets represent only a small subset of U.S. public companies, but U.S. policy decisions stand to affect the operating environment of companies globally.

Step 2: Beta Neutralize the Basket

To make broader predictions about other stocks’ sensitivities based on these baskets, we first adjust a raw long-short winner-loser portfolio so that it is expected to be (ex ante) beta-neutral to the MSCI ACW Index (or any other appropriately broad market index). If we don’t, then we will not be able to distinguish whether portfolio-level sensitivities to the basket reflect exposure to the relevant theme or to directional market risk (beta). 

Figure 1 shows results of this exercise in the context of the election example. It illustrates the performance of two illustrative winner-loser baskets. The left panel looks back to the 2020 election and shows the performance of a long-short basket of companies that at the time were expected to benefit and suffer (on a relative basis) from improving prospects for the Republican policy agenda. The right panel shows the performance of a 2024 election cycle Republican policy agenda basket described above.

Figure 1: Cumulative Returns of Hypothetical "Winner-Loser" Republican Policy Agenda Baskets

Source: Acadian based on index returns from Bloomberg. It is not possible to invest in any index. The above does not represent investment returns generated by actual trading or an actual portfolio. Hypothetical results are not indicative of actual future results. Investors have the opportunity for losses as well as profits. For illustrative purposes only.

Since subject-matter experts surely use observed stock price responses to emerging phenomena in constructing their long and short baskets, we apply background shading to differentiate “in-sample” versus “out-of-sample” performance (i.e., performance that informed the baskets’ construction from performance that might help in their validation). In each case, the charts exhibit out-of-sample performance that suggests the baskets indeed have value in tracking market assessments of the events and themes in question.

Step 3: Estimate Stocks’ Exposures to The Long-Short Basket

Given a (beta-adjusted) winner-loser basket, we can then apply a risk model to estimate stocks’ exposures to the theme across a broad investment universe. Risk models provide estimates of stock (and through aggregation, portfolio) volatilities and correlations with a benchmark—in this case the winner-loser long-short portfolio.

In predicting risk associated with macro catalysts, we generally opt for “short-term,” “statistical” risk models. Short-term refers to a model designed to forecast risk over a near-term horizon, e.g., days or weeks, which implies that its predictions should respond quickly and vigorously to changes in the environment. To achieve such responsiveness, parameters of short-term risk models are estimated from more recent and frequent market information than longer-horizon models, which smooth and dampen the influence of abrupt shifts.

Figure 2: Sensitivities to Hypothetical 2024 Republican Policy Agenda Basket among MSCI ACWI Index Constituents

Estimated based on data from 31-May-2024

Source: Acadian based on index data from MSCI: MSCI data copyright MSCI 2024. All rights reserved. Unpublished. PROPRIETARY TO MSCI. For illustrative purposes only.

By a statistical risk model, we mean one that does not use preselected stock characteristics, such as market capitalization and price momentum, to define the systematic risk factors. Instead, they use statistical methods to impute risk factors (which are simply linear combinations of stocks) that explain commonalities in stocks’ returns. While these imputed risk factors may not be easy to interpret, statistical risk models are well-suited to pick up on transient sources of risk, which is especially valuable in the context of macro events.[1] 

Companies that are constituents of the winner-loser basket drive explicit sensitivities to event outcomes. Companies that are linked to these outcomes via predicted correlations are interesting to explore and often are sensible. For instance, we find Warner Bros. Discovery, the owner of CNN, among the companies with the most negative predicted sensitivity to the 2024 Republican policy agenda long-short basket, even though it is not among the constituents named by subject matter experts.[2] The linkage here is identified by statistical factors explaining co-movement, but we will leave it to the reader to intuit the explanation.

Step 4: Estimation of Active Portfolio Sensitivities

Based on estimated stock betas to the winner-loser basket across a full investment universe, we can readily estimate any active portfolio’s sensitivity to the event in question. Figure 3 illustrates, using a representative sample of Acadian client portfolios. For the 2024 election basket, we see that in the days after the Biden-Trump debate, portfolios with positive ex ante expected betas to the Republican Policy Agenda basket, as estimated on May 31st, outperformed those with negative betas.

Figure 3: Portfolio Active Returns Versus Ex Ante Estimated Active Betas to Hypothetical 2024 Republican Policy Agenda Basket

Representative sample of Acadian portfolios


Source: Acadian. Portfolio performance is gross of fee. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investors have the opportunity for losses as well as profits. For illustrative purposes only.

Conclusion

Traditional risk management tools are not, on their own, well-suited to capture the transient and irregular risks generated by macro events and abrupt changes in thematic trends. Nevertheless, we can judiciously apply them to extrapolate the narrow predictions of analysts who have deep context-specific expertise in order to understand thematic exposures across broad universes of stocks and, therefore, in active portfolios. Managers can use this information to weigh potential trading costs and loss of expected returns from closing active tilts associated with macro events and themes into which they do not have keen insight. Resulting portfolios may realize risks more consistent with ex ante predictions by multi-factor risk models informing portfolio construction. Active returns will be truer to manager stock selection skill rather than the impact of events of unknowable outcomes.


Endnotes

  1. Please contact us for more information about statistical risk models.
  2. Reference to this company should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy or sell any specific securities. Acadian and/or the author of this post may hold positions in one or more securities associated with this company

Hypothetical Legal Disclaimer

Acadian is providing hypothetical performance information for your review as we believe you have access to resources to independently analyze this information and have the financial expertise to understand the risks and limitations of the presentation of hypothetical performance. Please immediately advise if that is not the case.

Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described below. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual performance results subsequently achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.

General Legal Disclaimer

These materials provided herein may contain material, non-public information within the meaning of the United States Federal Securities Laws with respect to Acadian Asset Management LLC, BrightSphere Investment Group Inc. and/or their respective subsidiaries and affiliated entities. The recipient of these materials agrees that it will not use any confidential information that may be contained herein to execute or recommend transactions in securities. The recipient further acknowledges that it is aware that United States Federal and State securities laws prohibit any person or entity who has material, non-public information about a publicly-traded company from purchasing or selling securities of such company, or from communicating such information to any other person or entity under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that such person or entity is likely to sell or purchase such securities.

Acadian provides this material as a general overview of the firm, our processes and our investment capabilities. It has been provided for informational purposes only. It does not constitute or form part of any offer to issue or sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe or to purchase, shares, units or other interests in investments that may be referred to herein and must not be construed as investment or financial product advice. Acadian has not considered any reader's financial situation, objective or needs in providing the relevant information.

The value of investments may fall as well as rise and you may not get back your original investment. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance or returns. Acadian has taken all reasonable care to ensure that the information contained in this material is accurate at the time of its distribution, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of such information.

This material contains privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the recipient/s. Any distribution, reproduction or other use of this presentation by recipients is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and this presentation has been sent or passed on to you in error, please contact us immediately. Confidentiality and privilege are not lost by this presentation having been sent or passed on to you in error.

Acadian’s quantitative investment process is supported by extensive proprietary computer code. Acadian’s researchers, software developers, and IT teams follow a structured design, development, testing, change control, and review processes during the development of its systems and the implementation within our investment process. These controls and their effectiveness are subject to regular internal reviews, at least annual independent review by our SOC1 auditor. However, despite these extensive controls it is possible that errors may occur in coding and within the investment process, as is the case with any complex software or data-driven model, and no guarantee or warranty can be provided that any quantitative investment model is completely free of errors. Any such errors could have a negative impact on investment results. We have in place control systems and processes which are intended to identify in a timely manner any such errors which would have a material impact on the investment process.

Acadian Asset Management LLC has wholly owned affiliates located in London, Singapore, and Sydney. Pursuant to the terms of service level agreements with each affiliate, employees of Acadian Asset Management LLC may provide certain services on behalf of each affiliate and employees of each affiliate may provide certain administrative services, including marketing and client service, on behalf of Acadian Asset Management LLC.

Acadian Asset Management LLC is registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any level of skill or training.

Acadian Asset Management (Singapore) Pte Ltd, (Registration Number: 199902125D) is licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. It is also registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 41 114 200 127) is the holder of Australian financial services license number 291872 ("AFSL"). It is also registered as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the terms of its AFSL, Acadian Asset Management (Australia) Limited is limited to providing the financial services under its license to wholesale clients only. This marketing material is not to be provided to retail clients.

Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority ('the FCA') and is a limited liability company incorporated in England and Wales with company number 05644066. Acadian Asset Management (UK) Limited will only make this material available to Professional Clients and Eligible Counterparties as defined by the FCA under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, or to Qualified Investors in Switzerland as defined in the Collective Investment Schemes Act, as applicable.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Acadian Asset Management

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics