Metaverse and the rise of the dataverse
Metaverse beyond “Meta”
The rise of the ‘dataverse’
I’ve been offered the opportunity to join the scientific track of FIWARE global summit 2022. I’ll be joining Wednesday’s track in the afternoon on “collaborative data analysis in the Metaverse”. I’ll be trying to focus on the Metaverse beyond the hype, and the growing number of buzzwords populating such a rising universe.
The rationale behind my position is sharing some common ground with the ‘dataverse’ proponents. From my point of view, it’s not a question of doing the right naming exercise betting on such a term instead of the original metaverse concept that W3C categorizes (The Metaverse Roadmap, 2007) into four types: augmented reality, lifelogging, mirror world, and virtual reality…
Metaverse ‘movement’ is usually associated with Web3 space’s components as enabling technologies and core concepts: DLTs, DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, even Decentralized Science (DeSci) DAOs are being considered for empowering scientific research. While today’s adoption of metaverse technologies should be considered, as a matter of fact, nascent and fragmented, there are quite dogmatic proponents of such concepts considering them as the foundations for the future of the Internet.
There are a lot of definitions for the metaverse. I would like to quote here the one from Gartner as it includes a series of attributes that I think are useful for igniting the debate: the well-known analysis firm defines the metaverse as “a collective virtual 3D shared space, created by the convergence of virtually enhanced physical and digital reality. A metaverse is persistent, providing enhanced immersive experiences. A complete metaverse will be device-independent, and will not be owned by a single vendor. It will have a virtual economy of itself, enabled by digital currencies and NFTs.”
I would say that it is the self-evident part of the metaverse, i.e. the three-dimensional shared space as the new UI for the Web3, that is blurring the reality behind the scenes. I mean a truly decentralized data economy that is slowly being built with a number of titanic efforts. I think that, in some way, data (the raw material the dataverse is being built of) is the elephant in the Web3’s room.
For the sake of understanding, instead of allowing citizens to fulfill the legacy, mandatory, paperwork they need for requiring any of the public administration’s services via their brand new avatar entering the augmented/virtual facilities of the town hall within the metaverse, we need that citizens to be able to manage -via a self-sovereign identity scheme- their own personal data in order to be properly served, in a timely manner, by the officials responsible for this or that public administration.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Self-sovereign data could be, as Craig Danton has suggested, “the next killer application” in resembling “this concept of a community “dataverse” where people or corporations freely share data”, a lá Snowcrash. If we get rid of its dystopian approach, Does it sound familiar to you? I’m talking about ‘data spaces’ as marketplaces where data will be seamlessly traded, monetized, and utilized… allowing data “to emerge as its own asset class”.
Web3 can be considered a kind of “movement” striving to rebuild the internet’s infrastructure in a decentralized way using primarily distributed ledger technology (DLT), e.g. blockchains. And the key question here, as some crypto skeptic good friends have been focusing their attention on for some time, is the one for decentralization: you can argue that such a decentralization is the key attribute behind such metaverse technologies; but in the end, as Luis García de la Fuente has been noticing, the power behind the numerous initiatives labeled as #web3 is actually very centralized, as a few venture capitalists and tech giants are occupying the Web3 space.
If we think about some real world initiatives, we can find a number of use cases for the metaverse within the smart cities landscape: according to NLC’s report on ‘Cities and the Metaverse’, “in 2021, the Shanghai Municipal Commission of Economy and Information Technology released a plan encouraging exploration of the metaverse across industries, the city of Santa Monica offers a virtual way to experience its downtown district through FlickPlay, a local metaverse social app company, and as part of the five-year metaverse Seoul promotion master plan, Seoul will invest $3.3 million to develop a communications platform that will enable the city to provide services to its residents in the metaverse”.
With a digital twins approach on the scene, we will be able to simulate stress conditions applied to our city’s different subsystems and socio-economic parameters, e.g. mobility infrastructures, urban planning, energy efficiency, industrial productivity, etc. What a fabulous planning machine would it be! Would this scenario be different from the one depicted by the CyberSyn project led by Allende back in the early 1970s in Chile without a truly self-sovereign data scheme in place?
What do you think about it?
Are you skeptical or dogmatic?
I’ll be allowing myself to quote Carl Sagan here as a concluding remark for all of us: “science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of thinking. A way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility.” (27 May 1996, interview with Charlie Rose).