The Missing Layer in the Product-Market Fit Pyramid
I have seen this figure in a lot of places:
The figure seems to be very professional and grounded on real world, right? Wrong.
I agree that the Market Fit is all about checking if people get what they expect: value.
But, the idea that the value comes from a "feature set" is weird. This oversimplifies and creates lot of unnecessary conflict with other professionals. Value is not a result of features, value is a result of various elements that deliver seamless, efficient, and high-quality services. In addition to people, processes, and flow, other key elements of a digital service system include:
Technology Infrastructure:
Data Management:
Integration and Interoperability:
User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) Design:
Security and Compliance:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Monitoring and Performance Management:
Continuous Improvement:
These elements, when combined effectively, create a robust digital service system that can deliver a high level of value and satisfaction to its users.
In the picture below you can see the layers that are missing the original pyramid.
In this second image it is clear that the features are grounded on different aspects that build a system. Some features depend on people, on specific technology, on data management, on right integration among systems and the right evolution of the software based on monitoring/analytics.
When you show UX as something "simple" you create the wrong idea about what is real UX Design.
In the second picture, I didn't expand the UX Design layer, but we should remember that it is a rabbit hole*.
-------------- END of ARTICLE --------------
*A "rabbit hole" is an idiomatic expression that refers to a complex, often confusing or intricate situation, topic, or chain of events that one becomes deeply engaged in or obsessed with. The phrase originates from Lewis Carroll's 1865 novel "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland," in which the protagonist, Alice, follows a white rabbit down a rabbit hole, leading her to a surreal and fantastical world.
In everyday usage, it refer to becoming sidetracked while investigating or researching a topic, as one discovers increasingly more related or tangential information, leading further and further away from the original focus.
Experienced Leader in Service Design | Proven Customer Experience Innovator in Financial Services
1yAnn Olasa FYI this connects with what we chatted about
CX Strategist and CX Designer | Former Service Design Program Leader at SCAD
1yIsabelle Oliveira