New On Wevolver: Get The Metal 3D Printing Technology Report
The Metal 3D Printing Technology Report is your essential guide to the latest advances, applications, and real-world insights into additive manufacturing with metal. Packed with detailed case studies, practical information, and interviews with industry leaders, this report reveals how metal 3D printing is transforming industries and pushing the boundaries of manufacturing.
Why Read This Report?
This report not only covers the technical processes behind metal laser powder bed fusion, directed energy deposition, metal extrusion, and binder jetting but also discusses:
Whether you are new to metal AM or looking to expand your knowledge, this report offers valuable insights to help you make informed decisions and stay ahead.
... MORE ON WEVOLVER
Recommended by LinkedIn
On-Demand Spare Parts: The Royal Netherlands Navy's 3D Printing Solution
The Royal Netherlands Navy has integrated 3D printing into its operations to address logistical challenges in maintaining its fleet. Traditionally, transporting spare parts to deployed ships posed issues like high costs, delays, and storage inefficiencies. Compounding these difficulties, some essential parts became unavailable when suppliers discontinued production.
To solve these problems, the Navy equips each ship with UltiMaker 3D printers and various materials, enabling the on-demand production of parts. This approach reduces dependency on supply chains, minimizes waste, and optimizes space and resources, enhancing operational efficiency and readiness.
MJF vs. SLS: Comparing Two Major 3D Printing Technologies
SLS and MJF are very similar in process and workflow, capable of producing nearly identical parts. MJF, with its isotropic properties and slightly higher print resolution, is ideal for smaller functional parts.
SLS, offering a wider range of materials and larger build volumes, is better suited for visual prototypes and medium-sized functional parts. Both processes are comparable in printing cost and speed, but MJF is more cost-effective for larger production volumes and slightly faster due to its faster cooling time and ability to reuse more powder.
This article compares HP Multi Jet Fusion (MJF) and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) 3D printing technologies and provides insights on how to choose the optimal process for your specific parts.