The Normalisation of the Climate Crisis
I’m noticing a worrying trend in climate reporting, not just a complete lack of it, but a normalisation of the stories associated with it when reporting extreme weather events. It’s as if extreme weather has nothing to do with climate change, or, as we should now call it, the climate crisis.
Take these three images from from yesterday’s globally respected BBC News website, of three extreme weather events going on around the world: two in the United States, one in Portugal. The headlines: ‘Five ways the US heatproof 50C cities’; ‘In pictures: Americans cool down in sweltering heatwave’; ‘Portugal wildfires: Huge blazes force evacuations.’
None of these headlines mentions extreme weather or climate crisis. In fact, in the case of ‘Five ways the US heatproof 50C cities’ this sounds rather like some kind of playful how to guide. The fact that human life is at risk at temperatures above 35C is not mentioned. The day before, an American football player, and a Super Bowl champion, died of heatstroke at age 32. A sportsman. Died at 32. Of heatstroke!
The second headline: ‘In pictures: Americans cool down in sweltering heatwave’ sits atop an image that looks a whole lot of fun: kids in a water spinkler. As does the rest of the article: kids and young people having fun in the sun. This is what the normalisation of the reporting of the climate crisis literally looks like. The climate crisis as an opportunity to have a great time.
‘Portugal wildfires: Huge blazes force evacuations’, a more direct headline, alluding to climate change, temperature rise and extreme weather, but absolutely no mention of climate or extreme weather in the article. None.
To be clear, what we’re experiencing are shifts in what should be geological time, across hundreds of thousands of years, in human time: that is, in the space of a single human generation. That. Is. Terrifying. This terror is clouding all of our judgements, and clearly the minds of journalists and editorial teams.
Strategy & Communications | Sustainability, Purpose and D&I
5yAgreed. I think the BBC in particular shy away from any framing which confirms or denies climate change as they still don't want to be seen as campaigning or taking sides, which given the scientific consensus is dangerous and seems to lack a sense of responsibility to the viewer. I think it also comes from a lack of strategy and joined-up thinking across the organisation in terms of making sure that everyone is up to speed on how events like this are connected and best-practice guidelines on framing. They have some good reporting in other areas, but usually only directly related to 'climate change' or 'plastic' as singles issues - not recognising it's all part of a wider picture.
Certified Professional Coach ICF, Chair - Body Corporate Property Committee (Self-employed)
5yFully agree. News as entertainment.
Sad state of affairs - normalisation is the just start. In a world where climate change deniers are running countries, it's hard to see how this type of reporting is going to get better. Recon Jeremy Waite wil have a few thoughts on this - he has some excellent points to make about how just a few words can change the course of history.
Communications Strategist - Oceans, Climate and more. Photographer.
5yIs the truth too scary to accept for photo editors?