Observability 2.0 : Towards Explainable and Transparent Artificial Intelligence
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is now ubiquitous across various industries, driving innovations that transform our society. However, the increasing complexity of AI models, particularly large language models (LLMs) and deep neural networks, poses significant challenges in terms of transparency and explainability. This article delves deep into the approach of Observability 2.0, advanced technical mechanisms, specific challenges, and real-world use cases illustrating these concepts' applications.
Observability 2.0: Foundations and Importance
Observability 2.0 in AI refers to the ability to monitor, diagnose, and understand the behaviors of AI systems in real-time. It goes beyond simple performance metrics to include detailed analysis of model decisions, understanding dependencies between variables, and identifying potential biases.
Why is this crucial?
Advanced Technical Mechanisms of Observability 2.0
To make AI observable and explainable, several advanced technical mechanisms can be implemented :
Recommended by LinkedIn
Technical Challenges of Observing Complex Models
Large language models (LLMs) and other complex models present unique challenges in terms of observability:
Advanced and Practical Use Cases
In medical diagnosis, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers are used to identify diseases from medical images and textual data. Observability allows understanding which image features (such as specific anomalies in a radiograph) and text features (such as symptoms described in medical records) led to a particular diagnosis. Using techniques like saliency maps, activation visualizations, and explainable attention models, doctors can validate AI recommendations and explain these recommendations to patients.
Financial institutions use random forest models and deep neural networks to assess credit risks of loan applicants. Through observability, bankers can understand which factors (income, credit history, transactional behaviors, etc.) influenced the algorithm's decision. Using SHAP and gradient-based interpretation techniques helps decompose the contribution of each feature to the final prediction, justifying loan approval or rejection decisions in an equitable and transparent manner.
In fraud detection, AI systems analyze thousands of transactions to identify suspicious behaviors. Observability enables tracing specific transactions that triggered fraud alerts and explaining why these transactions were flagged as suspicious. By integrating techniques like LIME, SHAP, and gradient-based visualizations (Grad-CAM), security analysts can interpret decisions of deep neural networks and LLMs, continuously improve models, and make informed decisions.
Conclusion
Observability 2.0 and Explainable AI are essential for the development and adoption of reliable and transparent AI systems. By enabling users to understand how algorithms make decisions, we strengthen trust, ensure compliance, and facilitate the continuous improvement of AI models. As AI actors, it is our responsibility to promote these practices and integrate them into our developments for a more ethical and transparent future.