The Paradigm Shift in Business
The science of leadership is undergoing a renaissance right now. We hear the term "paradigm shift" almost daily, but what does it mean? Where did it come from?
Thomas S. Kuhn, coined the term when he wrote the book on scientific revolutions in 1962, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", in which he served up a groundbreaking model of how scientific progress occurs. It challenged the traditional view of scientific progress and was backed up with many tangible examples of how revolution works. In a nutshell, Kuhn introduced the concept of "normal science," which he defined as the routine work of scientists within an established paradigm. Scientists solve problems within the framework of the prevailing paradigm, rarely questioning the validity of current thinking.
Kuhn outlined a set of attributes that help distinguish scientific revolutions from normal science and when a paradigm shift has occurred:
One of the most important things I learned from his book is that without a paradigm, errors cannot be evident and we only learn when we can see errors. Essentially all innovation comes from the perception of error, making error much more valuable than confusion.
I believe the science of leadership is undergoing this major paradigm shift right now from a mechanical, Frederick Taylor and Milton Freidman-influenced paradigm to one that is fundamentally influenced by the science of human intrinsic motivation of people like Edward Deci, Richard M Ryan , and the thousands of social science researchers who have cracked the code on group creativity and human motivation.
It is my observation that the errors introduced by unfettered free-market capitalism purely motivated by profitability and shareholder value are profound and now obvious to most leaders. While profitability is necessary for survival and important for financial investment in the future of all organizations, neither is the goal of the modern organization.
The goal of the modern organization is to solve problems for people in unique ways that help establish long-term relationships between the organization and the people it leads (employees, customers, etc.) This requires creativity.
For business leaders, this is a paradigm shift of the highest order.
Recommended by LinkedIn
References:
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, by Thomas S. Kuhn, Ph.D. (1962)
Principles of Scientific Management, by Frederick Winslow Taylor (1911)
Capitalism and Freedom, by Milton Freidman (1962)
The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory, edited by Richard M Ryan (2023)
More Thinking:
Helping SMBs insource growth plan execution without a full-time PMO using the Executagility Model®.
1yIntrigued by the science of intrinsic human motivation. Looking forward to more on this paradigm shift.
President at Optimize | Keynote Speaker at Vistage Worldwide | Forbes & Inc.com Contributor | Expert Strategy Facilitator
1yI agree with Sean. The problem is many people don’t view leadership as science. Many schools don’t even offer business as a legitimate field of study. A paradigm shift is in order.
The Momentum Framework >> Leadership and the Art of Possibility
1yTim Dodge >> Thank you for recommending Thomas Kuhn's book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions! I loved it.