The Permanently Imperfect Reality of Hybrid Work
Hybrid work is great for some people, but not everyone will be constantly satisfied (Credit: Alamy)

The Permanently Imperfect Reality of Hybrid Work

Hybrid work ticks many boxes – but it'll never be a one-size-fits-all solution for every worker and company. Plus, how bosses won the fight for power this year.

Hybrid meeting
Technology can be a big barrier for a happy hybrid-work environment (Credit: Alamy)

Hybrid work will only ever work for some employees

After a few years of post-pandemic confusion, the debate over return-to-office seems to have landed on widespread hybrid work. Throughout 2023, organisations tried a largely new way of working at scale – whether that's a common model of a fixed three days in office with two at home, or other flexible patterns.

Workers are generally in favour of these hybrid set-ups. But while more workers and companies are becoming accustomed to hybrid working, some consistent issues have emerged in these nascent trials.

Some of them may merely be teething problems, while others appear to perhaps be more systemic – and threaten to become endemic.

→Read more from Alex Christian

Boss with computer
The tug of war has ended with managers on top (Credit: Alamy)

How bosses won the fight for power in 2023

Tension between workers and bosses has risen dramatically throughout the past few years – especially around the return-to-office battle. As employees seek to retain the flexibility they've prized for more than three years, employers have sought to instil greater rigidity, often through fixed working patterns that require employees at their desks.

Since the pandemic, workers have largely had the upper hand over executives, whether due to a favourable labour market or simple outright stubbornness to give up their remote set-ups. But 2023 marked a turning point: for the first time since Covid-19 hit, amid a weakening economy and cooling labour market, employers are coming out on top. 

Yet although this power struggle has seemingly ended in favour of bosses, workers haven't lost all they've fought for – millions of employees have ended up with greater flexibility, autonomy and pay than perhaps ever before. Yet going forward, say experts, the new hybrid working environment looks set to be dictated by employers for the foreseeable future.

→Read more from Alex Christian

worried man at computer
Rapid AI advances are leaving some knowledge workers more vulnerable than they thought (Credit: Alamy)

The emerging AI that could threaten 'safe' jobs

Many workers may have believed that burger-flipping robots in fast food restaurants, or advanced fabrication machines in factories, would represent the first wave of AI-related job losses.

Yet the light-speed adoption and evolution of generative AI tools may now mean knowledge-work jobs that were long considered "safe" could be threatened even faster than workers anticipated. That includes creative positions that many presumed would be hard to automate, in fields like marketing, music production and graphic design. 

Accordingly, researchers have found that the "exposure curve is upward-sloping", says Mark Muro, a senior fellow at The Brookings Institution, who focuses on the interplay of technology, people and places. This means people in what may have traditionally been thought of as higher-echelon, professional positions are the workers most at threat of replacement by AI.

That's because generative AI tools and technologies can – or will soon be better able – to do all many things that have, in years past, been left to highly skilled humans: think tasks such as putting together marketing plans, search strategies and much more.

Part of this is new technology hitting the market. Robots that act like AI colleagues are on the way – and in some cases, they're already here. While there is reason to think that AI may be a boon to workers, there are also reasons many people working in knowledge-work positions should be looking over their shoulders.

→Read more from Sam Becker

Thanks for reading.

— Meredith Turits, Editor, BBC Business Features

Post.Doc.Can GÜNAY When we make a "Password" that is code for enter banking transactions. When who need calories at home. A T-MODEL APPLICATION.

Like
Reply
Mohammad Haeri

basalam.com/mamadketab t.me/mamadketab

1mo

Unfortunately, at the behest of Trump and Biden and iranian globalists, my children and i became torture in iran for more than five years ,and i have lost my job since 2019, but i was just a simple employee. They ransacked all the property of my heritage in Eslam shahr and Robat karim, and they ransacked the bulk of my lands with fake documents. However, i hope, one day a generation of politicians in iran and the united states is looking at such shameless actions that have done with me and my children without justified reasons, not the sense of pride that they now have. I wish they stopped torturing my children and i soon, and I wish one day comes, when the future generations of the united states and iran, have apologized to me and my children for torturing during the Past five years - torture without having justified me and my children.

Like
Reply
Lou Birt

Senior Lecturer & journalism course lead at the University of Gloucestershire. Media commentator & trainer. Former BBC Editor.

3mo

I always thought more work needed to be done on how you manage a split team with some in the office and some wfh. In a newsroom setting it can present real resource difficulties when a story breaks and one group - usually but not always those at home - can feel isolated. I tried doing separate meetings for each group for a while but it’s very time consuming.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics