The Perversion between Nation-State and the Health of its People

by Gregory Bundschoks, CEO of Ceres Esoteric Inc., aka CEHort, and Founder/Executive Director of Foundation for Healthy Schools.

October 7, 2024

Why does the unprecedented human health crisis appear to be criminal and inhumane?

Too many harm-producing "foods" are finding a kid's mouth and stomach. This influences metabolism (thinking, acting, being, doing) and immunity (the inherent design to identify and eliminate harmful unrecognized chemicals/molecules or foreign bodies "ingested" into the body temple).  

Knowing that ultra-processed and sugar-laced, along with chemical additive “foods” and “medicines” are causing harm to humans, where is a solution for this unprecedented human health crisis found?  Is this health crisis a result of the government enforcing public policy under a purposeful commercial mandate, the special interest lobbying to coerce those mandates, or the voting population deciding which candidate best represents the public’s best interests?

What is the purpose of the government? 

Security? For what person? 

Healthcare? For what person? 

Debt? For whose benefit?

The nation-state and all persons are registered as commercial entities. You can look that up (SEC and legal definitions). If all persons are registered for commercial purposes, then all activities of persons are commercial. You are a person. Your value is based upon your person’s commercial engagement. 

When contemplating health as a commercial construct, the model suggests we go to a doctor when we don’t feel well.  The doctor has little training in proactive health through nutrition. Studies (Cooper Ed.D) identified around 20 hours of nutrition training relative to the vast studies to become a doctor. I have so much respect for the studies, but if taking a Hippocratic oath, wouldn’t nutrition be at the forefront?  I truly empathize with doctors. These healthcare gatekeepers are caught between a commercial construct and the Hippocratic oath to not harm.

The exponentially growing medical sickness model deals with the health problems AFTER they happen. This model drives healthcare and a government’s GDP growth requirement.

You pay for what you eat. You pay for healthcare - a doctor's visit, hospital stay, or a pharmaceutical prescription (either through tax dollars or out of pocket).  Either way, you pay or the government pays for you given the tax dollar allocations to healthcare. 

As the costs of healthcare/medicine increase, more doctors are needed to cover the increasing number of sick people (and their children), yet less public funding exists.  Is the solution a person’s commercial participation through co-pay, pay for private expense health services, or a new wellness model?  Can a new wellness model even work when investment supports the growing health crisis for increased customers?

You pay with income your person generates through commercial engagement. Taxes are levied upon your person.  The choice is how to access money and use money. That’s “freedom” (to be liberated by the state, with the nation-state mandate to protect the investors and industry to drive market growth - the purpose of national function). 

The commercial-oriented sickness healthcare/medicine model is built upon the paid services after the illness happens. A wellness model would address the mechanisms of illness before it could occur. 

How does a human become sick?  The function of a cell is based upon an external signal/molecule/chemical element to produce a corresponding internal chemistry.  Unrecognized or foreign signals activate an immune response to remove a harmful entry into the body temple. As the body temple deals with increasing external toxic signals, the immunity gets overwhelmed.  An overwhelmed immunity is unbalanced, and unable to eliminate the increasing toxicity.  As this happens, the organism starts to experience metabolic problems (dis-ease). 

These problems impact an interconnected network of an estimated range of 30 to 100 trillion cells. A wellness model addresses the quality of the ingestion. This would minimize an overwhelmed immunity and encourage metabolism, with a health purpose.  

Without a value on human life or the health of a human being as a primary baseline, this sickness model drives the underwritten markets, commercial engagements, medicine and healthcare, and the purpose of the nation-state. This commercial purpose guides politics and the government elect.  The commercial engagement between persons is the purpose of the nation-state function. I have no problem with the brilliance of the commercial markets. Issues arise when the wellness approach capable of solving this unprecedented human health crisis, is not in alignment with the purposeful function of the nation-state or the government administering public policy.  Therefore, healthy citizens are not the mandate or purpose of the nation-state.

The success of the government is built around the sickness model. The sickness model increases national GDP to validate the growth of a nation’s production outputs. Yet, it does this at the expense of its citizen’s wellness.  There is no commercial output in the healthcare/medicine model if people are healthy. It would also harm investors and market mandates to profit from those supplying the customers of the sickness model. 

Those at the top of governmental leadership know this. They choose the status quo versus the wellness of its citizens.

These apparent soul-selling liars, campaign to get people’s votes.  Their interests seem to satisfy themselves through the income and pension from public tax dollars, and the industry connections to get rich (like the war and vaccine kickbacks).  

The majority of good people don’t know what they don’t know. Don't we all want to trust the peers we elect to represent our interests? Is health and wellness fundamental to the quality of your life? Leadership and towing party lines support this sickness medical model. This is to protect the nation’s commercial purpose of function. This identifies a healthcare / medical sickness profit growth model from making people sick. 

Investment in proactive nutrition and education is not the priority.  It will produce healthier people and that doesn’t help to sell pharmaceuticals or promote a doctor visit.  This is a systemic problem, IF, if the perspective of a forward-advancing human population is based on a healthy citizenry.  If people were to come first, the model would be based on the quality of the ingestion (nutrition and information). With 10,000+ chemical additives approved in the US (and around 350 in Europe), a people-first model cannot come to fruition. The ONLY way this sickness growth model changes is by establishing a new nation-state purpose based on wellness. 

AM Rothschild:  “give me control of a nation’s currency, and I care not who writes the laws”. The currency is based on commercial engagement between persons and policy reflects this. 

A new transparent trustworthy hybrid political platform is needed, with its wellness purpose supported by the majority.  The existing currency monetizes the commercial activity of commercially registered persons.  So for wellness to find value, the quality of a healthy human life must be established as a baseline and purpose of nation-state government administrative function. That baseline must be monetized with an at-par health-based wellness currency just as the commercial notes value the sickness model. Remedy comes in how the currency is attached to the purpose of function. This will differentiate between the commercial person and the actual human. It will also be the counterbalance to give human health and wellness a value.  This value cannot be found in the status quo led by liars and inhumane thinking.

Security of the person and the healthcare model is designed to profit from making people sick. This contradicts the Hippocratic oath (such as Dr. McCullough’s career being jeopardized by standing up against systemic problems). Yet, the doctors need to make an income, and since there is no value in a healthy human, the support goes to selling products and services to a sick customer, adult, or child.  Isn’t that perverse, immoral, or criminal (knowingly introducing toxic chemicals that cause harm)? 

Amidst a toxic overload from several industries (tobacco, processed foods, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, plastics, digital addictions, cosmetics and “personal hygiene”, furnishings and clothing, etc.), how is a proximate cause of harm assessed to assign liability?  Do we stop industry innovation to sell products and upset markets? Is the pay for an income-influenced PhD’s high enough to find support for the harmful toxicity (for example, pesticides, GMOs, food additives and processes, etc.)?

Bought and sold politicians mindfully preach the health of people, kids, family, communities, and society. These lies given a commercial bias harm kids and the future nation of people. The narratives support the sickness model, which is why people who care (like RFK Jr.) don’t get mainstream attention.  

Wellness-based education is required, from parents carrying a child in the womb and the early school levels upwards, and from political leadership downwards. Healthy mind, body, and spirit are based on nutrition and information to effect change. Change is challenging with no opposing platform to vote for which protects a status quo that doesn’t want change.  With control over information and enforcement of inhumane policies, it makes all dissenters conspiracy theorists. This is the reason for an attack on free speech with a trampling on the constitution and human rights. This is why family farms are at risk. This is why kids are targets of social media advertising. This is why our education models are inefficient in protecting the kids, their future, and the future of a nation. This is why a 30+% food waste. This is why unhealthy food crops and processes get the funding. This is why the government mandated push for experimental vaccines. This is why post-secondary institutions will prostitute themselves to get funding.  That’s when enough is enough. People must use reason as a wellness baseline to stand up against an inhumane moral wrong happening in society. There is a need to operate under a new platform people can trust, and find solutions to this perversion. 

Why does it appear that profit comes before people? Because it does so by design and purpose of nation-state function. Want proof?  How much went to support the flood victims or national infrastructure, and how much went to fund war-mongering?  

The Foundation for Healthy Schools (www.foundationforhealthyschools.org) will address the quality of food issues at the school level to introduce the most efficient educational models based on proactive wellness relative to the quality of the nutritional and informational ingestions. 

Jesuits had a saying: "give me a child to the age of seven, and I’ll show you the man”.

This is where we all need to find a common moral ground to build a proactive wellness solution. This means putting a value on human wellness, starting with the kids first, as the drivers of the future of a nation and humanity as a whole.

Just my opinion.