Post-Stroke Spasticity, Cognitive Load, and Lived Experiences in Outcome Measures

Post-stroke spasticity and its interaction with cognitive load and lived experiences have profound implications for rehabilitation outcomes. This review synthesises the findings from recent studies, focusing on the prevalence, predictors, and impact of spasticity while highlighting the significance of patient-reported experiences and cognitive challenges.

Prevalence and Predictors of Spasticity

Schinwelski et al. (2019) identified that 45% of stroke patients developed spasticity within the first year post-stroke. The study emphasised the widespread impact of spasticity on activities of daily living and the need for early recognition of its predictors. Wissel et al. (2015) extended this understanding by detailing key predictors of early spasticity, including lesion location, initial motor deficits, and rehabilitation intensity. These findings underline the critical importance of tailoring rehabilitation to individual patient profiles.

Impact on Health and Quality of Life

Gillard et al. (2015) highlighted the significant negative impact of spasticity on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), reporting that 16% of ischemic stroke patients experienced substantial limitations in daily function due to spasticity. The study discussed the potential benefits of early intervention to mitigate these effects and enhance HRQoL outcomes.

Lived Experiences and Cognitive Load

Bennett et al. (2023) explored the lived experiences of stroke survivors, noting that many struggle with cognitive challenges that exacerbate physical impairments. This qualitative study revealed how survivors’ inability to maintain everyday activities and roles deeply affected their emotional and psychological well-being. Similarly, Pike et al. (2021) linked meaningful rehabilitation outcomes to lived experiences, using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) framework to bridge clinical assessments with patient narratives.

Summary of Discussions

The discussions across these studies converge on several critical themes. Spasticity is not merely a physical impairment but a multidimensional challenge that encompasses cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions. The reviewed literature points to a pressing need for integrative approaches that combine physical rehabilitation with psychological and cognitive support. Moreover, a patient-centred focus, informed by lived experiences, offers a pathway to more holistic and effective rehabilitation strategies.

Implications for Practice and Policy

Although most studies did not explicitly discuss policy recommendations, their findings suggest several actionable implications:

• Early Detection and Intervention: Incorporating predictive tools into stroke care pathways to identify individuals at high risk of spasticity and cognitive decline.
• Holistic Rehabilitation: Designing programmes that address both physical and cognitive impairments, leveraging frameworks like the ICF to ensure comprehensive care.
• Patient-Centred Approaches: Integrating patient narratives into care planning to ensure that rehabilitation outcomes align with individual goals and lived experiences.

Conclusion

This review underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of post-stroke spasticity that extends beyond clinical metrics to include the lived experiences and cognitive challenges faced by survivors. Future research should aim to develop and evaluate interventions that integrate these dimensions, ensuring equitable and effective care for all stroke survivors.

References

Aprile, I., Guardati, G., Cipollini, V., Papadopoulou, D., Monteleone, S., Redolfi, A., Garattini, R., Sacella, G., Noro, F., Galeri, S., Carrozza, M. C., & Germanotta, M. (2021). Influence of Cognitive Impairment on the Recovery of Subjects with Subacute Stroke Undergoing Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation. Brain Sciences, 11(5), 587.

Bennett, K. J., Leese, J., Davis, J. C., Eng, J. J., & Liu-Ambrose, T. (2023). Exploring the experience of cognitive changes among community-dwelling stroke survivors: A qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 46(9), 1870–1877.

Boone, A. E., Wolf, T. J., & Engsberg, J. R. (2019). Combining Virtual Reality Motor Rehabilitation With Cognitive Strategy Use in Chronic Stroke. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(4), 7304345020p1-7304345020p9.

Brusola, G., Garcia, E., Albosta, M., Daly, A., Kafes, K., & Furtado, M. (2023). Effectiveness of physical therapy interventions on post-stroke spasticity: An umbrella review. NeuroRehabilitation, 52(3), 349–363.

Duncan Millar, J., van Wijck, F., Pollock, A., & Ali, M. (2019). Outcome measures in post-stroke arm rehabilitation trials: Do existing measures capture outcomes that are important to stroke survivors, carers, and clinicians? Clinical Rehabilitation, 33(4), 737–749.

Facciorusso, S., Spina, S., Picelli, A., Baricich, A., Molteni, F., & Santamato, A. (2024). May Spasticity-Related Unpleasant Sensations Interfere with Daily Activities in People with Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury? Secondary Analysis from the CORTOX Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(6), 1720.

Gillard, P. J., Sucharew, H., Kleindorfer, D., Belagaje, S., Varon, S., Alwell, K., Moomaw, C. J., Woo, D., Khatri, P., Flaherty, M. L., Adeoye, O., Ferioli, S., & Kissela, B. (2015). The negative impact of spasticity on the health-related quality of life of stroke survivors: A longitudinal cohort study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1).

Kerstens, H. C. J. W., Satink, T., Nijkrake, M. J., De Swart, B. J. M., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G., Van der Wees, P. J., & Geurts, A. C. H. (2020). Experienced consequences of spasticity and effects of botulinum toxin injections: A qualitative study amongst patients with disabling spasticity after stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(25), 3688–3695.

Lingo VanGilder, J., Hooyman, A., Peterson, D. S., & Schaefer, S. Y. (2020). Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairments and Responsiveness to Motor Rehabilitation: A Review. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 8(4), 461–468.

Marciniak, C., Munin, M. C., Brashear, A., Rubin, B. S., Patel, A. T., Slawek, J., Hanschmann, A., Hiersemenzel, R., & Elovic, E. P. (2020). IncobotulinumtoxinA Treatment in UpperLimb Poststroke Spasticity in the OpenLabel Extension Period of PURE: Efficacy in Passive Function, Caregiver Burden, and Quality of Life. PM&R, 12(5), 491–499.

O’ Donoghue, M. ead, Boland, P., Leahy, S., Galvin, R., McManus, J., Lisiecka, D., & Hayes, S. (2022). Exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders on the design and delivery of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for people post-stroke. PLOS ONE, 17(6), e0269961.

Patchick, E. L., Horne, M., WoodwardNutt, K., Vail, A., & Bowen, A. (2014). Development of a patientcentred, patientreported outcome measure (PROM) for poststroke cognitive rehabilitation: Qualitative interviews with stroke survivors to inform design and content. Health Expectations, 18(6), 3213–3224.

Pike, S., Lannin, N. A., Cameron, L., Palit, M., & Cusick, A. (2021). Chronic stroke survivors with upper limb spasticity: Linking experience to the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(15), 3925–3937.

Schinwelski, M. J., Sitek, E. J., Wą\. z, P., & Sławek, J. W. (2019). Prevalence and predictors of post-stroke spasticity and its impact on daily living and quality of life. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska, 53(6), 449–457.

Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2016). Predictors of Spasticity After Stroke. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, 4(3), 182–185.

Wissel, J. org, Verrier, M., Simpson, D. M., Charles, D., Guinto, P., Papapetropoulos, S., & Sunnerhagen, K. S. (2014). Poststroke Spasticity: Predictors of Early Development and Considerations for Therapeutic Intervention. PM&R, 7(1), 60–67.