Preemptive Power: How Offensive Security Shapes Cyber Resilience
As I continue writing articles about strategic deployment of a robust and lean cybersecurity program, this article will focus on building an Offensive Security Program. Cyber threats are evolving with alarming speed and complexity, organizations must arm themselves with an arsenal of proactive strategies to defend their critical assets. Gone are when passive defense mechanisms were sufficient. Today’s cyber warriors must adopt offensive security measures—such as penetration testing, red teaming, purple teaming, and threat hunting—to actively seek out and neutralize threats before they strike. But at the same time testing people, processes, and technology which is a form of assurance that all components are doing what they should be doing. These proactive approaches not only enhance an organization's defensive capabilities but also prepare them to anticipate and counter cyber threat actors effectively. By integrating these offensive strategies into their cybersecurity framework, businesses can turn the tide against attackers, transforming their security posture from reactive to predictive. This article explores the multi-layered approach necessary to fortify defenses and ensure resilience in an ever-shifting cyber threat landscape, providing a strategic blueprint to safeguard your organization’s future with an intelligence-driven framework and vision to harness and focus the team’s efforts.
Understanding Threats
As a CEO or CISO, it is imperative to ensure your team is well-informed about the cyber threat actors that pose a risk to your organization so you can implement effective defensive and proactive measures. This not only protects your business operations but also maintains the trust of your customers. Here is a high-level overview of the types of threats you should be aware of:
Common Methods of Attack
The initial access vectors used by these actors vary, but the most common include:
Specific Security Tools Need to be Deployed First
Before we delve into proactive offensive security, it's crucial to understand the foundational security tools necessary for an effective Offensive Security Program. I am vendor agnostic and won't recommend specific products, but here's an overview of essential tools required to ensure your program operates at full capacity:
Selecting the Right Tools
When selecting security tools, start by defining your specific needs based on your business objectives. Ensure that any new tool aligns with your existing processes and minimizes the introduction of new workflows. Additionally, consult your Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) Team to assess any vulnerabilities linked to the tools, such as country of origin or other security concerns that might affect your operations. Of note, engineering teams who drive the requirements or tool selection for the SOC, Threat Hunting or your CTI Teams, is an ill-advised proposition. Intelligence drive operations!
For example, consider an instance where I was part of a team that bought and deployed a new security tool. Despite high expectations, the tool was not deployed or connected to other systems, rendering it almost useless—a costly and ineffective outcome. This was primarily driven by the engineering team. This underscores the importance of not only selecting tools that meet the functional needs of your teams, such as infrastructure or engineering, but also ensuring these tools integrate seamlessly into your existing technology stack.
Testing Tool Effectiveness
It's vital to conduct a Proof of Concept (PoC) or Proof of Value (PoV) to test the tool's functionality within your specific environment. This hands-on evaluation helps confirm whether the tool integrates without disrupting existing processes or security measures. Known as Software Assurance, this process ensures the tool is free from known vulnerabilities and performs as promised.
Organizational Structure
In my previous posts, I've touched upon organizational structure for two key reasons. First, the necessity for teams to have access to a higher level of information from other teams; without this, their core functions can be significantly diminished. Second, to prevent the formation of silos. Having worked with dozens of organizations, I've seen firsthand how rampant silos can negatively impact the value of security efforts—they may keep teams busy, but not necessarily effective or value-adding.
For offensive security to deliver maximum value, it must be led with an intelligence-driven approach. Understanding the cyber threat landscape and the key actors involved is crucial, and this information typically stems from your CTI Program. Therefore, your Offensive Security Program should be integrated within your CTI Function to enhance coherence and effectiveness.
In a future article, I will delve deeper into what this integrated structure looks like and how it functions within larger organizations, providing a blueprint for enhancing security posture through strategic organizational alignment.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Teams and overall functionality
Penetration Testing
This team is essential for testing both externally facing and internal applications, especially targeting your high-value servers and databases. It's crucial to employ both Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) to assess security both pre-deployment and during runtime. Effective collaboration with your CTI Team is vital to align with the latest cyber threat landscape trends.
Threat Hunting
Consider this team as your cyber detectives, tasked with determining whether any unauthorized activity has occurred—or may still be occurring—within your network. Their operations are primarily directed by insights from your CTI Team. Without a CTI Team, your Threat Hunters may lack the necessary context to effectively prioritize and address threats.
Red & Purple Teams
Red Team
Drawing from military terminology where Red signifies the 'enemy,' this team simulates the tactics, techniques, and procedures of top cyber threat actors of concern within your industry. The primary goal is to rigorously test your people, processes, and technology to ensure your security posture is robust. Executive approval is required for these exercises, and the details of these tests are intentionally kept confidential from the Blue Team—your network defenders and incident responders—to gauge their real-time reaction to simulated attacks.
Purple Team
This involves a collaborative effort where the Blue Team is informed and works directly with the Red Team. The focus here is on ensuring that your security controls are effectively detecting threats. This capability can typically be automated for efficiency.
SMBs Recommendation
Most of this article is focused on large organization that have both money and people to create an offensive security program. The following are recommendations tailored for SMBs to stay on top of the latest threats and take proactive steps to engage and communicate with your vendors.
By focusing on these areas, SMBs can build a strong defensive posture and mitigate many of the risks associated with cyber threats, even without an offensive security team.
#cybersecurity #offensivesecurity #pentesting #threathunt #cyberthreatintelligence #SMBs #RedTeam #PurpleTeam #BlueTeam #securityStack #softwareAssurance
Dewayne Hart CISSP, CEH, CNDA, CGRC, MCTS Benjamin Edelen Mark Davenport, M.S., CISSP Cristian Julius 🔒Ivette B. Mari Galloway, M.S.I.S, CISSP James Trainor Pete Cordero CPA, CISSP, CISA, FBI (Ret.) Daniel Yocca (FBI Retired) Peter V. Michael Goodman Ben Ouano Sherry P. Jessica A. Robinson (She/Her)
Chief Operating Officer - APAC at Resecurity
8moThis is a high level blueprint for all CISO's who want a holistic approach in their Cybersecurity Initiatives. Well done Danny. Once again, spot on. 👍
InfoSec Risks Assessment Specialist: ISO 27005 ISRM| OCEG-GRCP | Cybersecurity Content Creator (Udemy Courses) | Cybersecurity Trainer | IAM Governance Specialist | Podcaster(CyberJA) |
8moOn point Danny Magallanes You can't know how Resilient your systems are or how vulnerable they are unless they are tested. So I totally agree on having those elements as part of your cybersecurity program.