Private Equity as the New Driving Force for Sustainability
In my previous blog, I noted with a sense of urgency, the need to incorporate sustainability into the Australian economy. Interestingly, the new factor to consider in this context is the role of private equity. Fund investors and regulators have adequate resources and function at a scale that can do justice to the issue at hand. Private equity firms are increasingly integrating ESG considerations across the investment cycle. As sustainability continues to permeate almost every aspect of the private markets, sustainable investments are no longer confined to a small, dedicated corner of the private equity market. The effects of these commitments to sustainability spill down to middle-market private equity and private credit organisations, inclusive of their current and prospective portfolio companies.
Leading with examples, we see BCG and IBM ventures integrating the ESG goals into their investing practices. BCG Group has been collaborating with Credit Susie for this process. The BCG group pushes for holistic, sustainable investing based on these simple steps such as:
Attached is a framework proposed by BCG:
IBM has shown commitment to environmental protections for five decades. Environmental leadership cuts virtually across all aspects of IBM’s operations and is foundational to its business. This commitment was further strengthen with the recent acquisition of Envizi, a company that specialises in data and analytics for sustainability and energy.IBM already has been leveraging Envizi to help streamline tracking and reporting of its progress against the company's own goals in renewable electricity procurement and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction.
Circular Economy
Based on the idea of circularity, a sustainable circular economy involves designing and promoting products that last and that can be reused, repaired and remanufactured—ensuring minimal waste and conservation of energy put into making new products. Introducing this idea to your business model would require a complete reworking of the product life cycle. At present, there is a myriad of opportunities in terms of different business models. New ideas come, such as producing clothing only on-demand. It is an added benefit to think that models based on reuse, leasing, repair and remanufacturing could generate four times more jobs, approximately $1,860 billion and reduce 165 million tonnes of CO2 than waste treatment, disposal and recycling.
We call it a fundamental reworking of the business model because we transcend from the narrow GDP growth index as a measure of success to “multi-dimensional progress” – the broader strengthening of environmental quality, human well-being and economic prosperity. The Australian government has shown overwhelming support for the initiatives for the circular economy. With numerous grants, incentives, and support, the $190 million Recycling Monetisation Fund and the $20 million National Product Stewardship Investment Fund.
Some examples of the multiple businesses adopting and thriving using the circular economy model in Australia include Bingo Industry, the construction industry. Another is Chep, a palette and reusable industry, acquired by Brambles, aiming to go beyond its carbon-neutral achievement, GoGet, a pool riding initiative, and Close the Loop, a successful product stewardship scheme.
Recently we saw Mike Cannon Brooks and Brookesfield attempt to acquire AGL to take private and transform AGL to accelerate shift into renewable energy market. However, due to the short-term goals in mind, their offer was rejected. However, this raises an important question about gatekeeping the sustainability sphere.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Tackling the Renewable Agenda
The latest news by the IPCC paints a bleak picture of the future, by declaring that most of the damage by global warming is irreversible. However, steps can be taken to control the limit of the devastation. Here is where private equity comes in. PE has found itself in a unique position to make sustainable, important changes to the environment. But how should the PE firms incorporate this magnanimous change?
Private equity firms pivot to an increased focus on sustainability, they must also pivot to a long-term, forward-thinking mindset. Whereas the functioning of the PE firms has leveraged historical data, the need of the hour is to assess the worth of a project using its ESG goals. To do so, the Climate Change and Sustainability Services Head at EY writes, about incorporating better talent to assess these risks and benefits, underlines the importance of understanding extrinsic and intrinsic risk factors, incorporating climate scenarios as core data points.
It is also important to realize that the stakeholders such as consumers and employees have evolved to be more socially conscious. A survey by Capgemini, shows that 79% of the buyers change their preference based on sustainability. Furthermore, the upcoming generation (GenZ), armed with technology and information, have proven themselves to be highly socially aware.
Changing the Game
Sustainability opens up new markets that are being tapped aggressively with the disruptions that it creates. To adjust to the demands of the new market, PE firms have to understand the local market, its changing regulations, and dynamics. The focus is now shifting from compliance, wherein the company is only obligatory adding a section on its environmental impact. Rather, the idea is to promote companies that have sustainability as one of their core principles and values. This requires an active effort on the part of the PE firms to keep up non-traditional companies. A recent pwc survey found that more than half (56%) investors refused general partnership on ESG grounds. Similarly, 66% rank value creation as one of the top three drivers of responsible investing.
The trend in financial reporting has also noticed a shift. Whereas there were no standard measures of reporting environment-related disclosures, repeated mergers and deals around them have resulted in integrated reporting where sustainability reports have also been audited. There have been global efforts to align capital markets with sustainable goals through taxonomy extension, i.e.new performance parameters for environmental objectives and proposals, mandating the CRSD (corporate sustainability reporting directives), and regulations such as supply chain examination, Green Bond Standard.
For example, IBM has meticulously set its ESG goals for areas including Conservation and pollution prevention, Energy and climate change, and product energy efficiency.
Conclusion
Today's private equity environment is rapidly shifting and increasingly under pressure from society, limited partners (LPs), and employees to manage and address environmental and social issues. The focus for all businesses on issues ranging from climate change to social justice has never been more intense. There is a fundamental shift in the thought processes of a number of private equity players regarding “impact”. As value created by investing sustainably tends to be more enduring. Businesses that focus on improving their positive impact are less likely to be rocked by regrettable incidents or controversy.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and comments on this topic.