Reevaluating School Hours in Malta: Should We Really Extend the School Day?

Reevaluating School Hours in Malta: Should We Really Extend the School Day?

A recent study commissioned by the National Commission for the Promotion of Equality (NCPE) has sparked heated debate about school opening hours in Malta. It suggests that aligning school hours with the typical eight-hour workday and reducing summer holidays could support families in achieving a better work-life balance. The report also highlighted that school hours in Malta are among the shortest in the European Union, a concern many believe needs addressing.

However, before we dive into a wholesale shift of the education system to meet these recommendations, it is essential to pause and question: is extending school hours the real solution, or could it cause more harm than good?

At the heart of the debate lies the call for longer school hours, with a shift to match parents' work schedules. The study highlighted that many parents struggle to reconcile their work hours with the current school opening times, often resorting to after-school programs such as Klabb 3-16. The fact that many parents are unaware of these services or do not use them suggests an information gap, not necessarily a lack of options. However, extending school hours to accommodate working parents might have unintended consequences that are worth considering.

First, there is the issue of balance. The argument for aligning school and work hours assumes that children’s time at school should mirror the workday – eight hours or more. But should we really be pushing children to spend more time in school, away from family, for the sake of a "convenient" solution for parents? School is not just a place for academic learning; it’s a space where children develop social skills, explore extracurricular activities, and, crucially, spend time with their families. Longer school hours may rob children of these precious opportunities for self-discovery and quality family time in the evening.

Another critical concern is the unintended consequences for children’s well-being. Studies consistently show that children need downtime to unwind after a long day of learning, not just physical but also mental rest. Extending school hours would leave less time for outdoor play, family meals, and quiet moments with loved ones, which are all vital for children’s emotional and social development. We must ask: do we want a generation of children who are academically overburdened and emotionally exhausted by the time they reach adulthood?

Moreover, extending school hours would place an even greater strain on teachers, who are already stretched thin. Increased hours would demand more from educators in terms of planning, teaching, and ensuring that students remain engaged throughout the day. Is this sustainable? Would it lead to a decline in the quality of teaching or increase teacher burnout? These are important questions that deserve consideration before any policy change is made.

What’s more, the push for longer school hours doesn’t necessarily solve the issue at its core. In fact, it risks creating a cycle of increasing pressures on families without addressing the root cause of the imbalance. Instead of extending school hours, we should be focusing on improving existing after-school programs like Klabb 3-16, making them more accessible, better marketed, and more in tune with the needs of today’s families. These services already offer a potential solution, but they remain underutilized simply because many parents don’t know about them or find them difficult to access.

Let’s not forget that some countries have already adopted a much more sensible approach to work-life balance. In places like Finland and the Netherlands, the emphasis is on a balanced, child-centered approach to education. Students spend fewer hours in school but more time on personal development, extracurricular activities, and family interaction. There is no rush to lengthen the school day to mimic a full workday. Instead, these countries focus on quality education and efficient use of time.

It is also worth noting that many of the countries with shorter school days actually encourage students to complete their homework during school hours, allowing more family time in the evening. By streamlining homework assignments and integrating them into the school day, these systems encourage a more holistic approach to education. Should Malta not consider similar reforms before hastily increasing school hours?

In conclusion, while it’s clear that school schedules in Malta need to evolve to support modern work-life realities, simply extending school hours may not be the answer. Instead, we should focus on reforming and improving after-school services, exploring flexible school schedules, and ensuring that children’s emotional and social needs are not sacrificed at the altar of convenience. A longer school day may be a quick fix, but it doesn’t address the deeper issues that families face. Let’s not rush into a policy change that could harm our children’s development and well-being in the long run. Instead, we should aim for a balanced, thoughtful approach to education that puts children and families first.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Denise De Gaetano

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics