Revolutionizing CISA TIES with Hybrid AI Data Fabric
Introduction
The CISA Threat Intelligence Enterprise Services (TIES) platform represents the operationalization of a crucial research initiative—Integrated Adaptive Cyber Defense (IACD)—originally sponsored by CISA and NSA from 2015 to 2019 at Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU-APL). This research aimed to improve security automation and orchestration, focusing primarily on standards like OpenC2, STIX, and TAXII for bottom-up security processes, such as automated responses to security events. I actively participated in the IACD community as a member of industry but my focus was on AI-Driven Integrated Adaptive Cyber Defense.
My original AI-Driven Integrated Adaptive Cyber Defense (AI-Driven IACD) approach took the IACD initiative a step further by emphasizing the importance of a top-down AI-driven framework. This approach proposed the integration of knowledge representation and reasoning (KR&R) techniques, such as OWL (Web Ontology Language) and RDF (Resource Description Framework), alongside analytics and machine learning capabilities. By structuring knowledge and automating workflows using AI, this model enables smarter, context-aware decision-making, making cybersecurity operations more adaptive and resilient.
The Hybrid AI Data Fabric is the 5 years later update of my original AI-Driven IACD framework from 2015-2019. Applied to the CISA TIES platform, it leverages KR&R, graph-based retrieval, and advanced AI workflows to enhance how threat intelligence is processed, shared, and acted upon. Unlike traditional bottom-up automation, the Hybrid AI Data Fabric integrates data from diverse sources into a knowledge graph that AI agents can query in real-time, making decisions based on the context and relationships between threat indicators, vulnerabilities, adversaries, and other critical cyber entities.
Overview of the Hybrid AI Data Fabric
The Hybrid AI Data Fabric is designed to unify data, information, and knowledge across disparate systems and sources into a cohesive, intelligent architecture. It builds on the key concepts from the AI-Driven IACD model and adapts them for the operational needs of CISA TIES.
At its core, the Hybrid AI Data Fabric consists of:
Establishing the Foundation for the CISA TIES Use Case
The Hybrid AI Data Fabric applied to CISA TIES brings together the insights and capabilities from the original AI-Driven IACD framework, but in a more scalable, operationalized form. By integrating both bottom-up automation (e.g., OpenC2 commands, STIX/TAXII threat intelligence sharing) and top-down AI-driven decision-making (enabled by KR&R and machine learning), CISA TIES becomes a platform that can respond to modern cyber threats with unprecedented agility and accuracy.
In this use case, the Hybrid AI Data Fabric represents a future-ready architecture that seamlessly merges the structured intelligence of ontologies with the adaptability of AI-driven automation. The CISA TIES platform, powered by this architecture, is positioned to handle the complexities of modern cybersecurity challenges with greater efficiency, precision, and scalability.
CISA TIES Hybrid AI Data Fabric Use Case
The CISA Threat Intelligence Enterprise Services (TIES) platform enhances cross-sector collaboration in cyber threat intelligence (CTI) sharing and analysis. With the introduction of the Hybrid AI Data Fabric, CISA TIES becomes a more intelligent, adaptive system capable of handling complex workflows, automating decision-making, and performing federated data integration. Ontologies are central to the system, allowing AI agents to operate with contextual understanding and fact-based reasoning. New ontologies can be added as needed to extend functionality for specific tasks or sectors.
Key Components of the Hybrid AI Data Fabric in CISA TIES
Focused Use Cases in CISA TIES with the Hybrid AI Data Fabric
CTI-Driven Incident Response
The Hybrid AI Data Fabric enhances incident response in CISA TIES by automating workflows using ontology-driven AI agents. These AI agents generate and adapt incident response playbooks based on real-time threat intelligence, using structured data from the knowledge graph to ensure that responses are factually accurate and context-aware.
Example: When a new vulnerability is detected in enterprise software, AI agents retrieve relevant historical exploits, TTPs, and mitigation strategies from the knowledge graph using GraphRAG. They automatically generate a playbook for response teams, instructing them to patch vulnerabilities, isolate compromised endpoints, and notify key stakeholders. As new intelligence is received, the playbook updates in real time.
Persistent Threat Hunting
In persistent threat hunting, AI agents use ontology-driven reasoning and graph analytics to correlate real-time threat intelligence with historical data. These automated workflows allow threat hunters to continuously refine their detection strategies based on the latest data.
Example: During a nation-state-sponsored threat hunt, AI agents automatically correlate IoCs from live alerts with previous nation-state attack patterns. As new intelligence is ingested, the AI agents adjust their detection workflows, proactively recommending areas to investigate, such as related vulnerabilities or potentially compromised endpoints.
Predictive AI for Vulnerability Management
The Analytics and Cognitive Layer enables predictive vulnerability management, allowing AI agents to anticipate potential exploitations by analyzing patterns from past incidents combined with real-time CTI.
Example: When a new vulnerability is discovered in critical infrastructure, the AI agents predict likely attack vectors by correlating historical vulnerability exploitations with the new CTI. They recommend proactive defense measures, such as patching and system hardening, based on past exploit behaviors and anticipated attack scenarios.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Federated Threat Intelligence Sharing
The Integrated Federation/Provenance Layer allows for secure, federated querying of data across distributed data sources without the need to centralize the data. SPARQL 1.2 facilitates secure, role-based access to data while RDF-star annotations ensure data integrity and provenance tracking.
Example: During a widespread ransomware attack, AI agents in the energy sector query the knowledge graph for indicators and attack vectors related to energy infrastructure. Meanwhile, the finance sector accesses its own relevant threat intelligence, ensuring cross-sector collaboration while maintaining the confidentiality of each sector’s data.
AI-Driven Playbooks for Incident Management
AI agents in CISA TIES generate adaptive incident response playbooks that follow CACAO standards and dynamically update based on real-time threat intelligence. These playbooks ensure that cybersecurity teams are always responding with the latest, most relevant information.
Example: During an active malware attack, AI agents generate a playbook outlining steps such as patching systems, isolating compromised endpoints, and communicating with affected teams. As the attack evolves and new CTI is received, the playbook dynamically updates to ensure that all response actions remain effective.
Proactive Threat Detection and Response
By using ontology-driven reasoning and graph-based machine learning, CISA TIES enables proactive threat detection, allowing AI agents to predict attack scenarios and recommend pre-emptive actions based on historical data and real-time cyber threat intelligence (CTI). This proactive approach mitigates threats before they fully develop, reducing the potential damage caused by cyberattacks.
Example: When a critical vulnerability is discovered in a healthcare IoT device, AI agents use the knowledge graph to analyze previous IoT exploits and predict likely attack scenarios. The AI agents then generate a pre-emptive playbook that includes recommendations for patching devices, monitoring network traffic, and deploying additional security controls to prevent exploitation.
Real-Time Cross-Sector Collaboration and Threat Intelligence Sharing
The Integrated Federation/Provenance Layer, with its support for SPARQL 1.2 and RDF-star, allows CISA TIES to seamlessly support real-time collaboration between different sectors while maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of sensitive data. Cross-sector collaboration is essential for sharing threat intelligence in critical incidents that affect multiple industries, such as ransomware attacks targeting both financial institutions and critical infrastructure.
Example: In response to a nation-state-sponsored cyber campaign targeting both the financial and energy sectors, AI agents in CISA TIES coordinate between sectors by sharing relevant indicators of compromise (IoCs). The financial sector’s AI agents receive intelligence on banking malware, while the energy sector’s agents focus on SCADA system vulnerabilities. Each sector receives sector-specific intelligence, enabling them to collaborate on mitigating the broader attack without compromising data security.
Enhanced Threat Intelligence with GraphRAG and Federated Data
The GraphRAG Layer enhances the ability of CISA TIES to deliver contextually relevant threat intelligence by leveraging graph-based retrieval augmented by ontologies. AI agents can access distributed data sources in real-time, ensuring that the retrieved intelligence is fact-checked and contextually appropriate for the tasks at hand.
Example: During a threat-hunting operation, AI agents use GraphRAG to retrieve real-time IoCs, TTPs, and vulnerability data from multiple distributed sources. The agents correlate this data with historical attack patterns stored in the knowledge graph to provide contextually relevant recommendations for threat hunters to investigate.
The Role of Ontologies in CISA TIES’ Hybrid AI Data Fabric
Ontologies are the foundation of the Hybrid AI Data Fabric and enable AI agents to function with deep contextual awareness and precision. They provide the semantic framework for organizing, structuring, and relating data, enabling AI agents to:
Conclusion
By integrating the Hybrid AI Data Fabric, CISA TIES evolves into an intelligent, scalable platform that enables real-time CTI analysis, automated decision-making, and cross-sector collaboration. With ontology-driven AI agents, GraphRAG, and federated threat intelligence sharing, the system can:
With ontologies at the core, CISA TIES can adapt to evolving cybersecurity challenges, ensuring that AI agents make decisions grounded in context, relevance, and accuracy. This architecture positions CISA TIES as a cutting-edge platform capable of defending against complex, coordinated cyber threats across industries. The Hybrid AI Data Fabric approach enhances the trustworthiness of AI in CISA TIES by integrating ontology-driven reasoning, secure data sharing, and predictive AI capabilities. This ensures that AI agents make decisions based on verified, real-time data and are contextually accurate, thereby improving the reliability and effectiveness of cybersecurity workflows.
The Hybrid AI Data Fabric is much more than just enabling AI agents—it builds on the foundational value of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR&R) to ensure trustworthy AI. KR&R (using ontologies like OWL and RDF) provides the essential structure for organizing and contextualizing data, ensuring that any AI-driven process is based on a shared understanding of cyber entities (e.g., vulnerabilities, adversary TTPs, IoCs) and their relationships.
By embedding KR&R at the core of the architecture, the system guarantees that decisions are not only automated but also contextually accurate, explainable, and consistent across different use cases. AI agents then add an additional layer of intelligence, automating workflows and enhancing real-time decision-making. However, the true trustworthiness of the system is rooted in the KR&R framework, which ensures that data is verified, traceable, and semantically aligned. The combination of KR&R and AI agents ensures that the Hybrid AI Data Fabric can support complex decision-making processes, adaptive threat responses, and federated intelligence sharing in a secure and reliable manner, far beyond just AI automation.
Cybersecurity Scientist | US Navy Cryptology Community Veteran | VFW Member | Autistic | LGBTQ | INTJ-Mastermind
2moThe key difference between structural common languages and ontologies is that structural languages are machine-readable but lack deeper understanding, while ontologies add the semantics that make data machine-understandable. Structural languages help systems exchange data, but ontologies enable systems to interpret relationships, meaning, and context, allowing for more advanced reasoning. In terms of interoperability, structural languages allow different systems to exchange data in a standardized way, but they don’t ensure that systems interpret the data the same way. Ontologies address this by creating a shared understanding of terms, concepts, and relationships across different systems. This enables true interoperability, where systems can not only share data but also work together to make informed decisions based on a common understanding. In large organizations, this shift is vital for coordinating cybersecurity efforts across disparate tools and teams.
Cybersecurity Scientist | US Navy Cryptology Community Veteran | VFW Member | Autistic | LGBTQ | INTJ-Mastermind
2moJonathan Baker FYI, you might find this of interest to understand why I point out the gaps in MITRE ATLAS in the context of threat-informed defense.
Cybersecurity Scientist | US Navy Cryptology Community Veteran | VFW Member | Autistic | LGBTQ | INTJ-Mastermind
2moKimberly Watson you might enjoy this update to my AI-IACD work.
Cybersecurity Scientist | US Navy Cryptology Community Veteran | VFW Member | Autistic | LGBTQ | INTJ-Mastermind
2mocc: Michael Herring Keith D. Willett, PhD, CISSP, ISSAP you might appreciate this post.