SAFETY-CRITICAL ELEMENTS/PERFORMANCE STANDARDS - ENGINEERING
WHAT IS PROCESS SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY-CRITICAL ELEMENTS(SCE):
Process Safety Management(PSM) is the identification, prevention, control, and mitigation of unintended release of hazardous materials or loss of primary containment that have the potential to become serious incidents (fires, explosions, mass injuries, fatality, etc.).
One of the key components to achieving a successful PSM is to create and maintain safeguards or barriers to prevent the release of hazardous materials and mitigate the effect/ consequence of those releases to personnel, asset, and the environment.
The safety-critical are those barriers or elements of an installation or plant that can be subjected to failure and substantially cause, contribute, prevent or help recover from a major accident hazard or event.
WHAT IS PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:
The Safety-Critical Element management involves the maintenance, inspection, and testing, and performance history to maintain SCE in suitable working conditions. Continual monitoring helps in the conformance and maintenance of SCEs in proper working conditions. Performance standards are those documents that lay the foundation for the expected performance from an SCE. A performance standard is typically defined as a set of requirements that constitute the basis for assurance tasks for safety-critical elements during design. Hence it is essential to develop and identify performance standards for the identified SCEs during the engineering or design stage.
WHY WE SHOULD IDENTIFY SCE:
SCEs and their Performance standards ensure that new installations or designs conform to good engineering practice and reliable engineering. For greenfield projects, it is extremely important that their design be robust and that they be able to perform their intended functions throughout their design life.
Also as the majority of oil and gas installations age, it is important to ensure that they remain capable of performing intended functions in the safest manner possible to avoid harm to personnel or to the environment. SCEs and their life-cycle-management processes help achieve these goals and reduce or prevent major accidents.
HOW TO IDENTIFY SAFETY-CRITICAL ELEMENTS:
Different companies would have various methods to determine SCEs, based on the maturity of their process safety management systems, Hazard and effects management system(HEMS), and the type of risk assessments they have available
A broad guideline would be as below:
- Identify the Major Accident Events on the installation.
This is done using different hazard identification techniques, involving both qualitative and quantitative methods like:
- Hazard Identification Studies (HAZID)
- Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP)
- Simultaneous Operation studies (SIMOPS)
- Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA)
- Safety integrity level determination (SIL)
- Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA)
The results from this process are generally recorded in a Hazard Register or Risk Register or Hazard and Effects management register, which documents all the potential major accident event scenarios on an installation. Based on this register a comprehensive Major Accident Hazard(MAH) sheet is developed.
- Identification of systems( equipment and instruments) that can prevent Major Accident Hazard(MAH)
From the review of the list/sheet of Major Accident Hazard developed from the above different HAZARD identification techniques identify the systems associated with each MAH.
SCE identification is usually carried out in the form of Bowtie Workshop (usually utilized by using Bowtie Software), which comprises a multidiscipline team consisting of engineering, operations, maintenance, etc. This will ensure there would be enough technical know-how of the major accident pertaining to the installation. Starting from the complete list of equipment( PFD, block diagram, etc) the team should assess each item to ascertain as to whether it could prevent or help recover from a major accident.
Typical Bowtie- Image courtesy Google
Based on the outcome of this workshop, a list of Safety and Environmentally critical element list and Safety and Environmentally critical tasks are derived. for the MAH for which SCE has not been assigned, proper reasoning should be assigned as to why an item has not been identified as safety-critical and with reference to the relevant major accident hazard.
PERFORMANCE STANDARD FOR THE IDENTIFIED SAFETY-CRITICAL ELEMENTS:
Once the SCE has been identified it is paramount to define its function in terms of a Performance Standard. These are like criteria that one needs to define, based on which we can measure the performance of SCE. The performance standards are defined based on:
- Overall Goal;
- Boundary/ Equipment components within the SCE system;
- Requirements in terms of Functionality/ Reliability/ Availability/ Survivability
- Dependencies/ Interactions in order to ensure the performance goals of the SCE are met. and
- References as design documentation or codes/ standards.
SCE and performance standards are input to the Safety register or operation safety case. Based on the Performance Standard, assurance tasks can be defined in the maintenance system to ensure that the required performance is met. . during operation analyzing the data in the maintenance, the system guarantees that all the SCEs required to manage Major Accidents are functioning correctly. If there are deviations to the agreed performance standards corrective actions can be taken to restore the integrity of the systems.
In summary proper identification of Safety-critical elements and defining their performance criteria during the Engineering phase is absolutely critical to prevent and Mitigate Major Accident Hazards during the operational phase of installation.
PS: Performance standards developed during engineering serves as an input to Operation performance standards that are developed during the operations phase.
Maintenance + Reliability
11moThank u for sharing this information, sir. Am wondering how different it is when it comes to SCE implementation for the oil and gas downstream sector as compare to upstream? To make it specific, the downstream sector does not involve any complicated process, and more to managing, handling and storing oil and gas end products? Is MAH still the driving factor towards determining the correct SCE? Is Bow Tie really needed? I do hope you can shed some light on this as well.
Environment, Health and Safety Manager
1yHello Everyone. Can you comment whether or not systems like Smoke Detectors and Alarms, Fire Water Network and sprinkler system, Safety Eye showers should be termed as Safety Critical? What are the examples of mitigation barriers that should always be a part of a site's Safety Critical management program? Any references would also be appreciated.
A Project Completion/Turnover and Quality Management professional with strong passion for success and competence
2yThank you Shashidhar! for sharing this article, so simple and educating. Safety Critical Elements and Technical Integrity Verification processes are now eminent, Although new to some extent but no doubt, a reliable process in Risk Management and process Safety. Just curious, is there a generic or standard SCE management tool?
Director and Senior Consultant ( CAMA/ CPAM ) - #Asset Management, # Process Safety, # Maintenance and Reliability, #Safety Culture Transformation, # Coaching and Training
3yThanks for sharing and very well summarized article Shashidhar. As rightly said the SCE elements and standards must form a key deliverable of the EPC phase. In my opinion , the SCE and Standards must be revisited once the Facility attains steady state to incorporate any changes during the commissioning, especially some of the barriers like interlocks , operating windows etc. It must be ensured that the MOC process is complied at all stages .
Process Safety Professional, Director, Techno Safe Consultants
3yYou’ve done it very well Shashidhar bhai..👏👏👏👏thanks for sharing!!