Scientific method in an era of magical thinking
Scientific method
I decided to write this short article motivated by the many dramatic developments around the world, with main one being the fanatic attack on Salman Rushdie, a man who lived in hiding most of his life, received fatwas and death threats and just got stabbed for expressing free speech and free thought.
Also:
An unshakable impression I get, and it's more stronger every day, is that there is a dangerous lack of rationality and critical thinking
“I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time -- when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness...
The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance”
Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World
Is there a fault on the side of scientific community? Unfortunately there may be...
I sometimes see situations where overly agreeable or meek scientists, critical thinkers and philosophers will bend over backwards to accommodate irrationality in a discussion, just to not hurt someones feelings. They might use phrases like “we could be wrong” or “we could never be 100% certain” in an effort to smooth the conversation, hoping the other side understands such clarifications for what they are i.e. expressions of scientific rigour and curiosity. Unfortunately more frequently such words are taken by the irrational side as ammunition, justification that “science is always changing its mind”, ironically proving the point that emotions cloud judgement. Sadly the irony is lost on the scientifically challenged…
"Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief can be preserved."
Tim Minchin
In a post-truth world defending truth
I long advised critical thinkers to give no ground. I view our purpose and mission is to elevate humanity from its intellectual dark age.
Religion was dragged out of the dark ages kicking and screaming. Mental health used to be the domain of demons, the cosmos was revolving around earth which itself used to be flat. Sickness was gods wrath instead of bacteria, viruses or parasites. Health was a blessing instead of nutrition and hygiene based. And the countless free thinkers burned at the stake or persecuted for the audacity to think and ask questions, like Giordano Bruno or Galileo, make me loose sleep at night.
Our world is reaching a level of complexity which does not leave any room for magical thinking. Unfortunately there is plenty still around. We will simply not be able to maintain the technological marvel we created if there is nobody who understands how it works, or worse yet, doesn't understand how to understand.
Recommended by LinkedIn
I fear the immortal words of Carl Sagan are more true today than they were ~15 years ago.
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. And this combustible mixture of ignorance and power, sooner or later, is going to blow up in our faces. Who is running the science and technology in a democracy if the people don't know anything about it?”
Carl Sagan
No need for nuclear war, it looks like the climate catastrophe will be enough.
"Science is more than a body of knowledge, it's a way of thinking. A way of skeptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority, then we're up for grabs for the next charlatan, political or religious, who comes ambling along.”
Carl Sagan
We are in a precarious situation. We will depend on future generations to help solve the existential dangers we created by never caring about the future, the sustainability of that we are doing, the impact on society. Are we equipping next generations and ourselves today with the best intellectual tool for the job, or should we consult our fortune teller?
Scientific method in a nutshell, paraphrasing Richard Feynman:
I attempted to produce here a list of “commandments” to follow. I hope someone will find them valuable.
As life is complicated, I do not expect this list to be exhaustive. I plan to continuously improve it. This seems a good place to start.
If you don’t know the following authors I strongly recommend reading some of their work or viewing their talks.
Margaret Downey is one of my top atheist role models. Founder and President of the Freethought Society, founder of the Anti-Discrimination Support Network, tireless champion of equal rights for non-theists.
I believe in a better future, for your children and mine. Let's make it a reality together!
Software Domain Manager at ATK
2yAllow for "if your prediction does not agree with reality, your idea is wrong" and I think you're spot on!