Security Design Flaws in Password Policy and Reset Process
Introduction
While registering for a new account on a new website (not to be publicly named) I found some really interesting security design flaws. These include weak initial password requirements, the ability to downgrade an account’s security via the password reset process, and the system's tendency to reveal valid usernames during login. This article will explore these issues in depth and offer recommendations for addressing the vulnerabilities.
The Flaw: Weak Password Policy, Reset Process, and Username Enumeration
The website's password management process suffers from several significant weaknesses.
Weak Initial Password Requirements: The password policy for new or manually changed passwords is limited to fewer than 15 characters and only allows uppercase letters, lowercase letters, and numbers. This limited character set and the relatively short maximum length severely restrict password strength.
Password Reset Can Downgrade Account Security: Any user can request a password reset for any account. When the reset occurs, the system assigns a weak, 6-character password composed of uppercase letters, lowercase letters, and numbers. This password is considerably weaker than what a user might have originally set, effectively downgrading the account’s security.
Username Enumeration During Login: The system reveals whether a username is valid during the login process. If an invalid username is entered, the system returns an error stating that the username was not found. When a valid username is used but with the wrong password, the system provides a different error message. This discrepancy allows attackers to confirm which usernames are valid.
Implications of the Flaw
These flaws carry severe implications for the security of user accounts and the system as a whole:
1. Reduced Password Strength from the Start: Passwords with fewer than 16 characters and without special characters are inherently weak. They are more susceptible to cracking via brute force or dictionary attacks, as the number of possible combinations is far lower than would be with a more robust policy.
2. Account Downgrade Exploit: The ability to request a password reset for any user allows attackers to effectively downgrade the security of the account by replacing a strong password with a much weaker one. Once a password reset has been made, a pre-generated password (with only six characters) is emailed to the email address. This attack vector is particularly dangerous if targeted at high-value accounts, such as administrators or users with elevated privileges.
3. Username Enumeration: By revealing whether a username is valid, the system enables attackers to focus their efforts on known accounts. Once a valid username is discovered, the attacker can launch brute force, dictionary, or password reset-based attacks.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Potential Exploits
Attackers could exploit these flaws in several ways:
Mitigation and Recommendations
To address these vulnerabilities, the following steps are recommended:
Strengthen Password Requirements:
Improve the Password Reset Mechanism:
3. Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA):
4. Prevent Username Enumeration:
5. Rate Limiting and Account Lockouts:
6. Logging and Monitoring:
Conclusion
Weak password policies, combined with an exploitable reset mechanism and username enumeration, create significant security vulnerabilities that could be easily exploited by attackers. By enforcing stronger password requirements, improving the reset process, implementing multi-factor authentication, and preventing username enumeration, these risks can be significantly reduced. Addressing these flaws will greatly enhance the overall security posture of the system and protect user accounts from unauthorized access.
🔐 Cybersecurity Consultant | 🚀 14 Years Crafting Secure Solutions | 🎖️ U.S.M.C Veteran | 🎯 Passionate about Robust Cybersecurity | 💡 Strategic Security Planner
3moGreat points, James. All of the intricacies and sign-ups, password resets, and reducing information to prevent malicious users from guessing logins. Recently uncovered a flaw in functionality that led to a complete takeover of a customer environment.
Head of Cyber Security and Risk at N Brown Group
3moMy threat model may be different to yours, but I’d argue that the account lockout threshold is a better defence against brute forcing a website password than length and complexity. I don’t care how much compute power is used to make the 5 guesses before the account gets locked. If you manage to get a foothold in my infrastructure and steal the database so you can actually use that compute power to brute force the password hashes, I’d be far more concerned with the data I can’t force a reset on - names, addresses, etc. Personally I’ve only ever seen credential stuffing as a means of brute forcing accounts, and complexity always fails in the face of password reuse.
Sr Application Security Engineer | I help all tech teams establishing application security engineering roadmap
3moCWE-521 need to be alligned with extra care for some crypto hashing functions such as bcrypt and its max length input limitation ..