The Shift to IP Transmission for Broadcast Video: A New Era in Broadcasting
David Simpson, CEO Streaming Media Live

The Shift to IP Transmission for Broadcast Video: A New Era in Broadcasting

Broadcast video has traditionally relied on RF (radio frequency) satellite transmission for delivering content across the globe. However, as technology evolves, a clear shift towards IP (Internet Protocol) transmission is taking place, revolutionizing the way broadcasters deliver video content. This transformation is driven by the flexibility, cost efficiency, and scalability that IP transmission offers over older satellite methods.

 The Decline of RF Satellite Transmission

For decades, RF satellite transmission was the go-to method for broadcasters looking to distribute video signals. Satellites offered reliable, long-distance transmission, particularly for live sports, news events, and television programming. Networks would lease satellite space, install uplinks, and ensure that dishes were in place to receive the broadcast.

While this system has worked, it comes with high costs, complex logistics, and limitations on bandwidth. Satellite transmission can also face latency issues, signal degradation during inclement weather, and high upfront investments in infrastructure.

 These challenges have led many broadcasters to seek alternatives, with IP transmission quickly becoming the top choice.

The Rise of IP Transmission

IP transmission leverages the power of the internet to send broadcast signals. Instead of relying on expensive satellites and dishes, broadcasters can transmit content over broadband networks, often using public or private internet connections. This method offers numerous benefits:

 1. Cost Efficiency: IP transmission significantly reduces the costs associated with satellite leasing, uplink facilities, and maintenance. Networks can utilize existing IT infrastructure, resulting in lower operational costs.

 2. Scalability: IP allows broadcasters to scale up operations easily. As internet bandwidth increases, broadcasters can transmit higher-quality video, such as 4K and HDR, without worrying about the limitations of satellite capacity.

3. Flexibility: With IP, content can be transmitted from virtually any location with an internet connection. This flexibility is especially crucial for live events, where broadcasters can set up temporary networks without relying on permanent satellite equipment.

4. Redundancy and Reliability: IP transmission allows for better redundancy options, as multiple paths can be created for content delivery. If one path fails, the system can automatically switch to another, ensuring continuous transmission without interruptions.

Case Studies: Networks Embracing IP Transmission

Several major broadcasters and Production Companies have already made the switch to IP transmission, setting examples for the industry:

1. Streaming Media Live and 2024 World SUP and Paddleboard Championship. Copenhagen Denmark

This month Streaming Media Live traveled to Denmark to help with Live IP  Camera Transmission. Streaming Media Live utilized IP and Bonded Cellular as a crucial part of sending five cameras over six miles back to the control room in Copenhagen.  A mixture of Bonded Cellular, Starlink and 5G Antennas and networks helped us to transmit 50 mbps  of live feeds from the beach area 6 miles away back to the control room where the show was switched live and then sent for distribution across multiple CDN platforms.

2. NBC Sports and the Tokyo 2020 Olympics

During the Tokyo 2020 Olympics, NBC Sports utilized IP transmission as a core part of their video delivery strategy. By leveraging IP, they were able to transmit live feeds from Tokyo back to the United States for further processing, editing, and distribution. The system enabled high-quality, real-time video transmission across multiple platforms—traditional broadcast, streaming services, and mobile apps.

 NBC's shift to IP allowed for more flexibility and reliability, especially given the challenges of managing an event as massive as the Olympics. With IP transmission, NBC Sports achieved seamless coverage across different time zones and devices while reducing transmission costs compared to traditional satellite.

3. Fox Sports and Remote Production for NFL Games

Fox Sports has also embraced IP transmission, particularly for their NFL coverage. By utilizing IP infrastructure, they have shifted a portion of their production workflow to remote locations, reducing the need for on-site staff and equipment. Video feeds from stadiums are transmitted over IP networks to remote production hubs, where editors and directors can manage the broadcast in real time.

 This approach has enabled Fox Sports to reduce operational costs while maintaining high production quality. The flexibility of IP transmission also allows for greater redundancy, ensuring that feeds are not disrupted, even during high-traffic moments.

4. Sky UK and IP-Based Broadcast Operations

 Sky UK is another broadcaster that has integrated IP transmission into its operations. The company has transitioned to a hybrid IP and satellite delivery model, focusing on delivering content over IP for both live TV and on-demand services. By investing in IP-based technologies, Sky UK can deliver high-quality video content more efficiently, particularly for their Sky Q and Sky Go services.

The move to IP has allowed Sky UK to enhance its customer experience by providing content on multiple platforms simultaneously without significant increases in cost. The ability to transmit video over IP networks has also opened the door for more targeted advertising and personalized content delivery.

 The Future of Broadcasting: IP vs. Satellite

 As more broadcasters transition to IP-based infrastructure, the future of satellite transmission is increasingly uncertain. While satellites will likely continue to serve niche markets—such as remote areas without reliable internet access—IP transmission is quickly becoming the industry standard for high-quality, scalable video delivery.

 Beyond just cost savings, the adoption of IP transmission offers opportunities for innovation in content creation and distribution. Broadcasters can deliver tailored, interactive experiences to audiences while maintaining greater control over their video feeds. As 5G networks and broadband speeds improve, IP transmission will only become more robust, enabling even more advanced broadcasting capabilities.

Conclusion

 The broadcasting industry is witnessing a transformative shift from RF satellite transmission to IP-based delivery methods. The benefits of IP—cost efficiency, flexibility, scalability, and redundancy—are too significant to ignore. Networks like NBC, Fox, and Sky UK are leading the way by embracing IP transmission, demonstrating its potential in live sports, news, and entertainment.

 As the technology behind IP transmission continues to evolve, broadcasters that make the switch today are positioning themselves to thrive in the increasingly competitive and digitally-driven media landscape. Streaming Media Live has made a significant investment in IP Transmission Technology. Leveraging existing R.F. Satellite, along with IP and Bonded Cellular to maximize your transmission delivery needs. Contact us directly to find out more. info@streamingmedialive.com

Brian Manahan

Sr. Solutions Architect

2mo

Amazon’s Kuiper services will be game changing in this space. The upload capabilities even with aggregating satellite and 5g services still has latency issues. There are great vendors that try to accomplish this like Peplink, but the fact is that nothing is guaranteed. Broadcasting in remote areas will still be a challenge due to lack of available 5g towers and LEO satellites that specialize in download capacity are still severely impacted by small user terminals that offer little in upload. Mixed together, these technologies do well with HA/BCP by ensuring packet delivery by pushing redundant packets across the same lines, but I have not seen much past a 50mbit upload capability. So, this limits us to a single camera. Of course, there are more expensive options such as SES and the likes - but let’s be real. In what world is a 100mbit symmetrical satellite service worth the $100k/month price tag? Peplink’s new HDDome’s are great but they still use older snapdragon chipsets. I have found great success using DIY Quectel RM551E m.2 modems with PHY adapters (vs serial) leveraging Quad Nic SBC’s (solid run) running OpenMPTCPRouter- fork of OpenWRT. You either pay a 3P vendor and get enterprise support, or you build a DIY

  • No alternative text description for this image
Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics