Should remote workers be paid less than their city counterparts?
Getty Images

Should remote workers be paid less than their city counterparts?

There are home offices among the gum trees, near uncrowded surf breaks and high in the ski fields across Australia and New Zealand. As the pandemic swept the globe, companies realised many of their workers could be just as efficient — if not more so — at home, and the world of remote work opened up.

Recruitment director Emma Hoar says, "The pandemic created more open-minded ways of working and embracing that has positively impacted so many organisations globally."

For a statistically significant cohort, this has meant moving somewhere far from the city, where homes are cheaper and life runs at a regional pace. Atlassian  is currently on a drive to hire people outside of capital cities. For many regional residents, it’s a dream to have a thriving tech business welcome applicants from Mataranka to Moree.

The Australian Financial Review  points out the open invitation comes with a small catch, there’s a two-tier pay system with workers in NSW and Victoria earning more than other states.

As co-founder Scott Farquhar puts it, "We pay slightly differently in some of the major metro regions to recognise the cost of living" adding that these jobs come with higher salaries than you’d ordinarily find in a regional area.

Atlassian is not alone. During the pandemic, many US-based tech companies including Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta and Microsoft (LinkedIn’s parent company) lowered pay for staff choosing to permanently leave expensive cities like New York and the San Francisco Bay Area.

Does this makes sense for an Australian and New Zealand context?

Mentor Natasha Mitchell says the process has not entirely come as a surprise.

"Cost of living has always appeared to be a factor into salary setting, so location usually does matter. If companies are able to isolate the 'cost of living' component versus the value for work done, then maybe there is a case for a different salary based on where you are located or if you are working remotely."

For some, the practice still rubs the wrong way. Recruitment director Louise Hall-Strutt says, "I think people should be paid on the value they are bringing to the business and it shouldn't make any difference whether they are working from home, regionally or from the office."

"A good employee is a good employee regardless of location or work preference and should be recognised as such."

IT leader Graham Lott points out that remote workers have unique advantages for employers.

"An employee working from home represents less of a cost to their employer due to the decreased amount of office real estate that is required."

"It could be argued that because the employer cost base has gone down, more profits should be redistributed to their employees who do work from home."

Skills trainer Nicole Field made the move from metropolitan Melbourne to regional Victoria, and says, "I know I would earn more in city areas but I enjoy the challenge and reward of seeing our cohort into jobs." She believes pay should be determined by ability and output. Venue Partner Luke Lazdins  is a remote worker and agrees, telling LinkedIn, "Just because I work from home does not mean my productivity or ethic differs from those who are in an office."

What about those who currently live in the city, near work, and want to ask to move to a new area? Recruitment director Sheryn Leach suggests, "If you want to work from home then I feel that can be negotiated. We have candidate shortages everywhere at the moment. However, there is no shortage for the work from home opportunities, so as I see it, supply and demand."

Do you think people should be paid a premium for living in an expensive but central location? Should remote workers take a small pay cut to work somewhere more affordable? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

No alt text provided for this image

Would you go to work with a cough? Workplaces are creating their own Covid-19 rules now that mandatory isolation periods are over. Here's what people are saying.

Want to keep your skills up to date? Upskilling ensures that we are able to stay relevant in an ever-changing environment. Here, LinkedIn members share how they keep their skills and knowledge up to date. Take a look.

No alt text provided for this image

Sometimes it’s best to go back to basics when it comes to a job search. Fortunately, LinkedIn Learning has a course that walks you through the main steps of finding a new job. This LinkedIn Learning course offers helpful tips to make an impression on prospective employers. You can watch the course below or by clicking here.

Virginia Gordon

Community & Alliance Manager at StoreConnect Pty Ltd

2y

Remote workers have to pay additional expenses that aren't required if you work in an office. Home insurance doesn't cover work related items such as laptops, desks and other equipment - it costs extra. Added heating or cooling costs during the work day hours, electricity, the requirement to set up some part of your home for work, which cuts down on its functionality for your family and the equipment involved. Desks, chairs, etc. Ensuring your internet is good enough and adding hardware to make it so. By saving on rent and other things, employers can instead give that to their employees to cover those costs that they would usually cover in an office setting.

Carolyn A.

Agency/Contract work in Queensland Government - Brisbane, Australia - roles: Cabinet and Legislation Liaison Officer, Parliamentary, Ministerial and Director-General Correspondence, Project Work

2y

Those who travel further to the office, in some cases, may pay more in both time and transportation in order to come to a job they love. To me this is the equivalent of paying someone based on gender; age; or whether they have dependents. Pay scale should meet the duties and the output and enable equal employment opportunity. Anything less can lead to staff absences, disgruntled employees and poor work performance as well as high turnover of staff.

Damien Bovalino

Analytically minded professional adept at problem solving

2y

First and foremost salaries should reflect the value someone brings to an organisation. However organisations need to compete for staff in the market; so if there is a limited pool who live near the office then the org will need to pay higher to attract staff, conversely if an org utilises technology to allow people to work remotely then the org broadens their employee pool market and thus can lower their wage costs. It's provides for a win-win-win. Those who need to be in the office can get paid more to cover their costs, those who work remotely can save the org in staffing costs while the staff get a better quality of life. Happier people, less congestion!

Erin Kanisek

Head of Operations | Class 1 Real Estate License | NSW Solicitor | Juris Doctor | BA (Hons I)

2y

I work remotely and my productivity is much higher than when I commuted to work because I have more time to actually complete work. To pay remote workers less is to say remote workers are less valuable because they aren't in the office. That just brings us back to the old mantra of 'looking busy in the office' will get you a promotion, rather than actually being productive and putting out quality deliverables from wherever you are located.

Jamily Lichaa

💼 Business Connect Builder 📊 Project Manager 📈 Business Development 🎙️ Speaker 👥 Joint Business Owner/Director 👩💼 Entrepreneur (Same Start)

2y

Yesss!!! I completely agree with Louise Hall-Strutt. Well said.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics