Sneakernomics: Lessons from Levi’s
My first buying job (a very long time ago) was buying Levi’s for a department store. Well, “buying” is probably too strong a word. Twice a year my Levi’s “salesperson” would come in and hand me a piece of paper, telling me what I could buy and each month’s allocation. (sound familiar?). Levi’s was the largest apparel brand in the world then and, as a buyer, you did what you were told, regardless of if it fit into your open to buy plan or flowed according to the business. There was no alternative.
Then, a few years later, after I became a merchandise manager, the jeans world began to change. Suddenly, smaller upstart brands like Britannia and Jordache burst on the scene, selling for much higher price points than Levi’s and capturing the Baby Boomers’ attention.
Levi's was no longer the most important brand. Levi’s was really the victim of its own success. The brand was overdistributed and far too dependent on a handful of styles to drive sales. When the more expensive “designer jeans” emerged, Levi’s could not chase those price points of the “better” jeans. Nor could they effectively diversify from their core products.
The denim industry grew rapidly, with Levi’s shedding share. While Levi’s was still the largest denim brand, it is no longer the largest apparel brand, now with dozens of brands competing for the consumer’s dollar.
I see some interesting parallels to where the sneaker business is today.
Nike is the largest footwear brand in the world but has been shedding share for some time now. Smaller upstart brands had captured all the heat and all the growth. Nike is in no danger of going away, but if trends continue will be a much smaller player than they were at their peak.
Recommended by LinkedIn
I do not expect the small brands to continue to grow at their current pace, but I do expect they will grow. Nike’s current weakness has opened the door for every brand to gain shelf space and to take share.
Adidas seems poised to take significant share in the US, if they focus on making products the BIPOC teen wants to wear. If Adidas gets it right, they could take significant hare in the US.
Nike is finally saying all the right things they need to do: focus on wholesale; regain position in mid-market; pull back on the largest items to regain heat; stop promoting so much on DTC.
But all of these initiatives will take years to take place, and during the transition, Nike’s sales will be weak, and the brand will continue to donate share.
This revolution of the business will be fun to watch.
executive, founder, learner, adventurer
6moThe predictable reality so consistently and well explained by the late, great Clay Christensen #innovatorsdilemma So much for us all to do in our study and creation of brand to serve the cultural shifts everywhere. Thanks Matt Powell
S•I•K•E
6moI’m watching Mr Powell. 🍿
Chairman, Principal, CEO, Founder,President, Board of Directors, Leader of Social Impact and #B Corp
6moLiv it
Global Sourcing, Supply Chain & Operational Advisor for Apparel, Footwear and Equipment Supply Chains and Product Engines~ Driving Long Term Value through Simplified, Optimized Partnerships
6moAn excellent point. They exited a ton of talent but this is what all old legacy brand have to do. Levi's is doing well now and completely reinvented and repositioned. BTW, Gap Inc was a major factor of their demise in denim and lifestyle products. Now look at Gap Inc. They are a hot mess too and must change. Comparing the denim/lifestyle world and athletic world is a good to show how it can unravel....but it's really like comparing apples and oranges. Nike AND Adidas have a lot of lifting to do. Both cultures of product ( for different reasons ) are sadly badly damaged!
All things denim, heritage, streetwear, surf & outdoor related. Clothing/footwear history & heritage wear. Open to consult if asked nicely. 😎.
6moSpot on analysis. As someone who also bought Levi’s for my own store back in the eighties through to the early 2000s I can really identify with so much of that. If ever a brand not only took its eye off the ball but lost sight of it altogether it was the jeans giant…their stubborn and persistent refusal to listen to the countless retailers who saw exactly what was happening is is the stuff of legend. Nike are not in quite as bad a situation (yet) but it’s the same essential problem…staggering levels of individual and corporate complacency combined with a quite remarkable capacity for self delusion…especially where their own hype is concerned. Levi’s have never recovered…which perhaps indicates that they have never really learned anything.It could indeed be argued that it was only some inspired marketing by BBH in the the mid eighties that propelled them into the popular zeitgeist…once there they lacked the imagination or the dexterity to sustain their appeal or fend off the upstarts. Ditto Nike…to a very large degree. Not much ever really changes in this industry.