Stop BANTing prospects - start facilitating their buying process
Baseline Selling and IMPACCT qualification

Stop BANTing prospects - start facilitating their buying process

Let's dump BANT and use IMPACCT qualification

Recently, I published a LinkedIn article about the dangers of early BANT qualification and how it can drive away leads and cause salespeople to overlook potential leads still early in their buying journey.

This article attracted several supportive comments and prompted a brilliant piece from Bob Apollo, B2B opportunity qualification: beyond BANT and MEDDIC to IMPACCT

Considering this feedback and Bob Apollo IMPACCT, I want to redefine the role of marketing and sales or business development reps (X)DRs and where IMPACCT qualifying should occur during the buy-sell process.

I have excerpted the following from Bob’s article to explain the IMPACCT acronym.

I: Issues and Implications - what are the prospect’s key business issues, what are the implications, who is affected by them, and are the consequences sufficient to force them to take action?

M: Money and Economic Metrics - Has an appropriate budget been allocated, and if not, is there an obvious source of funding? What is the economic impact of the key business metrics?

P: Decision Process and Criteria - what are the prospect’s decision and approval processes, what are their decision criteria - and are all of these clear and favourable to us?

A: Authority and Influence - who are the key stakeholders and gatekeepers and what influence do they have over the decision - and who has the ultimate authority to approve the project?

C: Champions - have we identified and engaged with powerful and effective internal champions who are willing and able to promote both the project and our approach to the rest of the stakeholder group?

C: Competition - what alternative options are they considering, how do we stand against them, and what is the relative priority of this project vs. their other investment opportunities?

T Timing and Urgency - how urgent is the project, when are they planning to make a decision, what is driving this, and how confident are we in this date?

The Role of Sales/Business Development Representatives

Now that we understand IMPACCT, let’s use Dave Kurlan 's #BaselineSelling sales methodology and process to explain the hand-off between sales development and the sales team and where IMPACCT qualifying should occur in the sales process.

1. Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs): These prospects are curious and open to discussing whether your company can help solve their problems. The qualification bar for MQLs should include Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) criteria.

2. Business Development Representatives: The sales development rep's domain is between home plate and first Base. S/BDRs should focus on identifying good fits based on ICPs and readiness for a meaningful conversation, not on BANT qualification. That’s it! Anything more they learn about the prospects’ problems and goals is a bonus and useful in a first meeting.

3. Salespeople: The most important part of the sales cycle is discovery between 1st and 2nd bases. It is the salesperson’s job to understand the buyer's issues and their implications, their (I), their commitment to resolving the problem, the impact of solving or not solving the problem, and determine if it is a good fit before applying more rigorous qualification criteria. A meeting summary or qualification confirmation letter is the key to improving win-rate. It should recap the meeting, the buyer’s current state, desired outcomes, and the impact of change. It should also commit the buyer to the agreed next steps, providing an auditable pipeline milestone to qualify the prospect. Once the buyer agrees verbally or in writing with your meeting summary and commits to the next steps, they are a qualified prospect. They can enter the forecast at 20% weighting. A good salesperson should close 50% of the deals that have qualification confirmed by the buyer.

4. MPACCT: Opportunity qualification happens between 2nd and 3rd bases.  Once we have a qualified prospect at 2nd base, we enter into a more in-depth analysis of the buyer’s business, how they buy, who will sign off, how they plan to fund the acquisition and their timeline for implementation while sharing how we can help and fully understanding their desired outcomes from change.

5 Qualified Opportunities: When the buyer is at 3rd base, they are a fully qualified opportunity. At this point, a sales presentation, demonstration, and potentially a paid proof of concept and proposal make sense. A subsequent post will provide more details about what should be included in the sales presentation, proof of concept, demonstration, and proposal.

Summary: The Value of Patience in Qualification

As others have commented on Bob Apollo’s post, qualifying is a continuous process, not a one-and-done once, and certainly not upfront in the first meeting with the buyer. We agree that BANT should be buried in the graveyard of 20th-century sales terminology. By aligning qualification efforts at the appropriate place in the sales process and the prospect's buying timeline, salespeople can avoid alienating potential customers and increase their chances of success.

The key is to create value at each stage of the buyer's timeline. Early interactions should centre on listening and understanding the prospect's needs, educating them about alternative approaches and establishing trust. As the relationship develops and the prospect moves further along their buying timeline, they will volunteer the MPACCT details.

By resisting the urge to qualify too early and instead concentrating on establishing the buyer’s issues, the progress they are trying to make and the commitment to change, using a consultative selling approach, sales organizations can build stronger relationships with prospects, uncover more opportunities, and ultimately close more deals. The goal should be facilitating their buying journey, not forcing them into a premature sales process that serves only the seller's interests.

 

Robert Koehler

GTM Advisor, Independent Sales Consultant, Fractional Sales/ Sales Enablement leader, Sales Coach & Trainer

4mo

Mark Gibson Love the depth of your thinking. What are the implications in your mind to the hiring profile and development/ enablement of SDRs in a world where we are aligning more to buyer problems in the problem awareness stage vs. BANT?

Like
Reply
Rob Mathewson

Enterprise Sales Leader | AI - Data - SaaS

4mo

Mark Gibson cheers to you and Bob Apollo for this discourse. Your baseball diamond metaphor is a powerful one. However, I would suggest that unlike a standard diamond, the IMPACCT diamond has elongated legs from home to first and third to home. The BDR/Prospecting game is not the funnel game it once was. Prospects are in a bad mood about templated outreach. In my experience, their tolerance for engaging in inauthentic conversations is low. This begs for a reinvention of the SDR/BDR practice that doubles down on automation for finding prospects but demands more of the human prospector to engage in authentic conversation with their prospect to speak to the heart of the issues and implications. The third baseline is a different story, however. As Bob addressed in his article, the threat of "no action" is always looming until the negotiation is complete. This duration will ultimately depend on the successful execution of the I+MPACCT, but success is ultimately determined by whether or not a close is realized. So, a good-but-not-great IMPACCT might get you around third but then thrown out on a play at the plate. That makes for a painful out.

Bob Apollo

Founder @ Inflexion-Point | Enabling B2B sales organisations to deliver consistently compelling customer outcomes

4mo

A remarkable synthesis, and a home run! ⚾️

Nelson Fernandes -Sales Coach Big Leaps

Ex TCS | I help Salespeople, Sales Managers and Sales Leaders to Elevate the Sales Profession. I help Organisations to grow BigLeaps by Building Trust, Selling with Authenticity.

4mo

What a brilliant piece of work, transposing IMPACCT on Baseline Selling. What a beauty Mark Gibson. Love the way you have depicted the hand-off between Sales Development and Core Sales responsibilities. Just loved every bit of it. And yes, to reiterate. Let's stop BANT'ing potential prospects when it all just begins.Too early, too soon and probably not in the right hands to uncover those answers best! Thank you. Simply brilliant

Dave Kurlan

Sales Transformations | Sales Performance Expert | Best-Selling Author | Award-Winning Blogger | Columnist at Top Sales Magazine | Top-Rated Sales Trainer | Top-Rated Speaker | CEO

4mo

Mark Gibson, this is a perfect union of Baseline and MPACCT and a great illustration of the delineation between S/BDRs and Sales.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics