The Strategic Role of PPM: High-Level Resource Planning, Not Micromanagement

The Strategic Role of PPM: High-Level Resource Planning, Not Micromanagement

Project Portfolio Management (PPM) systems are invaluable tools for organizations, particularly in the life sciences industry, where they provide a strategic overview of resource allocation and project prioritization. However, PPM is often misunderstood as a tool for micromanaging individual tasks or closely monitoring the work of people across different functional areas or even countries. This misconception can lead to significant challenges and frustrations. Based on our experience, it's crucial to understand that PPM is designed for high-level governance and resource planning, not for controlling the minute details of individual tasks.

PPM as a Tool for High-Level Resource Planning

At its core, PPM is intended to help organizations make strategic decisions about how to allocate resources across a portfolio of projects. It enables leaders to see the big picture, balancing project demands with available resources, and ensuring that the most critical initiatives receive the necessary support.

PPM systems are particularly effective in:

  • Resource Allocation: Providing a macro-level view of the organization’s resources, PPM helps in deciding where to allocate people, budget, and time to align with the company’s strategic priorities.
  • Project Prioritization: Enabling decision-makers to prioritize projects based on their strategic importance, potential ROI, and alignment with business goals.
  • Risk Management: Offering a high-level overview that helps in identifying potential risks related to resource constraints and project timelines, allowing for proactive management.

The Pitfalls of Using PPM for Micromanagement

One of the common pitfalls we’ve observed is the attempt to use PPM systems to manage individual tasks and control the work of employees who may be part of different functional areas, business units, or even located in different countries. This approach often leads to several issues:

  • Political and Organizational Challenges: Trying to control the tasks of individuals who are not within one’s direct functional area can create friction and resistance, especially across different business units or geographical locations. Each unit may have its own priorities, management styles, and cultural norms, which can complicate efforts to impose centralized control.
  • Inefficiency and Frustration: Employees who feel micromanaged are likely to become frustrated, which can lead to decreased morale and productivity. Furthermore, the additional layers of oversight can create inefficiencies, as employees spend more time reporting and less time working on their tasks.
  • Misaligned Expectations: When PPM is used to manage tasks at a granular level, there is often a mismatch between what the tool is designed to do and the expectations placed on it. PPM is not intended to track every task in detail but to provide a strategic overview.

PPM as a Governance Tool for High-Level Oversight

PPM should be seen as a governance tool that provides a high-level perspective on resource allocation, project progress, and strategic alignment. It is best used for:

  • Macro-Level Resource Planning: PPM helps in determining the overall quantity and type of resources needed for different projects or business areas, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively without getting bogged down in the details of individual tasks.
  • Strategic Decision-Making: By offering insights into the status of various projects and the overall resource capacity, PPM allows leaders to make informed decisions about which projects to prioritize and how to adjust resources as needed.
  • Facilitating Cross-Functional Collaboration: Rather than attempting to control every detail, PPM enables cross-functional teams to collaborate more effectively by providing a shared view of priorities and resources, while allowing individual teams the autonomy to manage their specific tasks.

Conclusion

PPM systems are powerful tools for high-level planning and governance, offering valuable insights into resource allocation and project prioritization. However, they are not designed for the micromanagement of individual tasks or for exercising control over employees in different functional areas or locations. Attempting to use PPM in this way can lead to organizational challenges, inefficiencies, and frustration.

Instead, PPM should be leveraged for its strengths: providing a strategic overview, facilitating resource planning, and enabling informed decision-making at the macro level. When used appropriately, PPM can significantly enhance an organization’s ability to manage complex project portfolios, ensuring that resources are allocated where they are most needed, and that projects are aligned with strategic goals.

Tailored Solutions for Your Needs

To truly enhance your operations in the Life Sciences industry, it’s essential to assess your current organization and data management practices. Only then can you define processes supported by IT solutions that save both time and money. Contact us directly via

  • WhatsApp at +393288141675
  • email at grizzo@Platflow.ch

to schedule an introductory call and explore how we can improve your internal and external processes to generate value.


www.platflow.ch

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Giulio Rizzo, MBA

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics