Strategic Sustainability for Operational Resilience
Although the term “Operations” is used to define a particular task group in company management, in this context we use Operational Resilience as a concept that covers all activities and decisions, including Financial, HR, Marketing, Production, Delivery, etc. To know whether a company is resilient, it needs to review how and where it has been affected by changes, how well it is doing under the new circumstances and what would happen if more changes occurred. This, naturally, leads us to risk management.
How is risk management related to sustainability?
In a world of numerous factors that are out of our control, becoming resilient as a company - even as an individual- requires a true understanding of ourselves. Even if a manager doesn’t have the bandwidth for "all this extra stuff" because they’d rather focus on revenue generation, it is recommendable to create an 8th day of the week to sit down with relevant colleagues and discuss about the changes with highest probability of happening and significance of impact. In their traditional sense, Risk management, Business Continuity and Incident Response disciplines already take care of preparing a Plan B for the short term.
This exercise must be done for the long term, too. And for several other issues, not only for financial risks. Both in spiritual and business circles, there is a commonly given recommendation:
“Know thyself”.
Become aware of yourself and of your surroundings.
Know your strengths and weaknesses.
Run a SWOT analysis on your company’s current version and see the gaps between your findings and your ideal version, considering the risks and opportunities identified among the global and local trends. Estimate their possible range of impact on your business, and the probability of them coming true. These will indicate the materiality of the issues and help with prioritization. Working on these gaps will be the step stones to Operational Resilience.
This is like running a due diligence on your own company under today’s circumstances as well as several future scenarios. Even tasks one might find mundane, such as documenting the corporate know-how and capturing the company culture in written policies, help you prepare. Tracking a new sort of HR data will bring awareness on a talent retention risk. Verifying the sources and processes of your suppliers will make your Procurement process more robust.
How privately owned companies might be at a competitive disadvantage
The case of publicly listed companies is itself a big topic. There are ESG rating agencies, ESG-aligned investors and sustainable investing strategies. There are also numerous tech-led solutions that allow investors and companies to work on publicly available ESG data. The significance of sustainable finance is enhanced every day by the fact that wealth is being transferred to the younger generations who value sustainability more than their predecessors.
Then there are privately owned companies. Their names do not frequently appear in sustainable finance news, yet they are still financially impacted by sustainability decisions.
For instance, their publicly listed competitors disclose ESG data as per the regulations, which make them innately more transparent. When an external stakeholder or potential investor is interested in knowing more about a listed company, most of the financial and extra-financial (ESG) data is already out there, and the company already has processes in place to track and report on sustainability practices. However, a privately owned company is not typically accustomed to keeping ESG data at hand, available to be shared on the spot with potential investors. It is tougher for them to prepare, as there is a limited amount of publicly available information, which makes numerous ESG solutions of the market inapplicable. And if they have the data, they don’t feel comfortable sharing it until it is modified into a safer shape.
This may sound like the issue is restricted to disclosure practices, but in the ESG space, if a company isn’t prepared to share certain ESG data, it might mean that the company does not track them, which means that the sustainability is not yet embedded into the DNA of the company – in other words, ESG factors are not part of their decision-making process on the given topic.
For example, if a company condemns child labor but is missing a written policy, there can be two reasons: either the managers check the suppliers in-person, or the company partners with suppliers based of assumptions. In case of an incident where a significant supplier is proved to benefit from child labor, both scenarios lead to negative consequences for the company, as there would be no proof of evidence explicitly rejecting the practice.
An example from HR would be employee satisfaction. If a company doesn’t interact with employees on working conditions, it might be facing silent quitting. Tracking their reaction to corporate culture, Work-From-Home policy, and absenteeism rates and disclosing HR policies at least internally, will make talent retention more manageable.
These examples can be multiplied for each aspect of the value chain; finance, production, upstream transportation, downstream distribution, etc.
Recommended by LinkedIn
How does Sustainability drive innovation and operational processes?
A manufacturing company’s environmental responsibility is a good example. Traditionally a company’s concern remains within the boundaries of its operational decisions. As its control fades away once the product is sold to the end user, one might think that its responsibility is over, and whichever way the consumer chooses to dispose of the product is out of the company’s responsibility.
However, a sustainable perspective would require this company to have thought of the disposal method already during product designing phase. Raw materials should be selected based on the availability and efficiency of recycling methods. Campaigns can be set up to advertise on Reuse-Repurpose-Recycle trends. Consumers can be informed of sustainable disposal methods and second-hand options. If a type of plastic is difficult to recycle, it should not be used in the product, so the company seeks an innovation around the raw material.
That’s how a company can reduce its negative impact even outside its control area.
What drivers, other than regulation, encourage companies to innovate and follow sustainable practices?
There have been various surveys proving the increasing interest in sustainability, and the visible difference between the choices of young and old generations. A 2023 McKinsey survey(1) suggests that the percentage of people willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products increases with every new generation. While 16% of Baby-boomers and 23% of Gen X say they’d pay a premium for sustainable products, the ratios are 48% for Millennials and 49% for Gen Z. If you consider that more and more purchasing decisions are made by younger generations, you can estimate the impact of not aligning your strategy with it. And it is not just about marketing strategy anymore, because consumers are also becoming aware of greenwashing pitfalls and demanding truly sustainable practices.
As for talent retention, a 2024 Deloitte survey(2) lays out that 42% of Millennials and 46% of Gen Z have already changed or plan to change job or industry due to climate concerns.
We can therefore conclude that it is crucial for companies, even for the privately-owned ones, to embed sustainability into their DNA to reach overall operational resilience, be it for customer relations, risk management, talent acquisition or financial health.
Özge Özdemir, MSc., CESGA
Co-founder & Chief Sustainability Officer Ascentys
Feel free to reach me at ozge.ozdemir@ascentys-esg.com if you have any questions or remarks.
Disclaimer: This article is entirely authored by me (without AI). If you'd like to quote parts of it, kindly make sure to keep the contextual wholeness and refer to me.
References: