Supply Chain Excellence Focuses on Improving Outcomes
Shutterstock

Supply Chain Excellence Focuses on Improving Outcomes

I am excited that this monthly newsletter now reaches more than 100,000 readers. I hope the writing and the research help you and your team.

My current focus is gathering research for my next book. The working title is The MisGuided Gold Diggers. The focus is on the evolution of supply chain planning, the definition of global supply chain teams, and how the industry got so enamored with technology that companies failed to optimize outcomes. Many technologists and consultants improved personal wealth, but the question is, "Did we improve outcomes?"

I don't think so, but I am engaged in a year of research with the IYSE group at Georgia Tech and the Data Science Institute at the University of Wisconsin to understand more.

It is my version of Good to Great. The book highlights the failure of the analyst groups touting tactics like ERP II, which drove tight integration of ERP to APS without substantiation. It also showcases how the industry changed when Evergiven got stuck in the Suez Canal. Suddenly, everyone was a supply chain expert. There are lots of opinions. Sadly, I find that there is very little factual research. I want to change that.

The book will showcase the case studies of companies that used supply chain programs to improve outcomes for peer groups using the Supply Chains to Admire methodology.

The book will take a researched view of the last decade. While companies tout a VUCA world (I hate this acronym), 2013-2019 was a period of low variability. Working with the data science group at the University of Wisconsin, I will share insights from over 100 quantitative research studies completed using my followers on LinkedIn as a panel group. (If you are one of the 330,000 followers and have taken one of my studies, thanks. In the work, I will never betray your trust by revealing your name or your company's name.)

The research with the University of Wisconsin highlights the choices that drove value and the mistakes that eroded value. We are correlating the responses to balance sheet information. In short, I believe that we missed an opportunity to build effective global supply chains. If I am wrong, I will change the book title and premise.

The work with Georgia Tech will define value. This research uses public-reported data from 1982-2022 to analyze which metrics drive the highest market capitalization and the relationship between supply chain excellence and market capitalization. A supply chain leader using a balanced scorecard has a 70% impact on market capitalization. In the book, we will share a new hierarchy of metrics to substantiate why companies need to move from functional cost metrics and traditional optimization to maximize a balanced scorecard. This statistical modeling will take a year to complete. Ultimately, we will analyze the Supply Chains to Admire research and the Gartner Top 25. The problem in the industry is that there is nothing in the academic literature that defines value. Most companies optimize to reduce cost, which does not necessarily translate to margin or value. Inventories grow despite the expressed commitment to ESG filling warehouses with the wrong products.

The team has completed three industries, demonstrating that the greatest value occurs at the intersection of operating margin and inventory turns, which requires organizational alignment and design thinking. This link will take you to the presentation given at the recent Informs conference.

We will also showcase the work completed on thinking of the supply chain as a series of flows, starting with demand streams, at this year's ASCM conference in Austin on September 8th-11th. The goal is for companies to rethink demand as a series of flows using outside-in (channel data) and design supply strategies based on supply data to improve outcomes. Attendees will view other companies' work on rethinking demand and use the insights to draw their river.

Since all books make us feel better when there is a hero, the book ends with success stories of significant companies completing a transition from inside-out to outside-in planning processes and the redefinition of decision support.

What do you think? What hypothesis should I test?

Check out my recent research:

A plea to rethink supply chain software selection. Thoughts. Selecting Supply Chain Software.

Research completed with Nulogy on the value proposition of network solution investments. Network Investment. Defining the ROI.

Thoughts on the investment of Blue Yonder with One Network. If Only There Was There There

Insights on building outside-in planning processes. Outside-in Planning. How to Jump. And Just Jump

Research completed with UST on inventory optimization and the need to include supply variability. Rightsizing Inventory.

Jacob A Miller CSCP

Asia Based Supply Chain, Purchasing, & Engineering Professional.

7mo

Congratulations 🎉

Like
Reply
Lambo Zou

4K Followers - Furniture Hardware Expert | Smart Home Systems | Niche Product Development | Advanced Manufacturing | Material Science | Sourcing Specialist

7mo

Thank you for sharing. Good ideas, valuable thoughts.

Like
Reply
Iuri Pinto

Operational Direction | Supply Chain, Procurement, and Maintenance Executive | Supply Chain Director | Enterprise Menthor | Continuous Improvement Management

7mo

Lora Cecere great post for reflexion!

Tom Klein

Co-Founder at Careeryze

7mo

Thanks for your inisghts at a deeper level, Lora. Caused me to go back and read your Outside-In post. While I've seen technology be a catalyst for better outcomes, I can appreciate the skepticism ( blockchain as an enabler being one current example that's now getting more skepticism applied ).

Like
Reply
Christine Pfefferle

Principal and Owner of Redstone Consulting, Inc.

7mo

Lora - I resonate with what Gary Newbury stated. I'd like to see whether companies use end to end performance metrics to understand how the combined impact of process and technology change improve outcomes for the Customer! not just the Company.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Lora Cecere

  • Three Reasons Why Supply Chain Centers of Excellence Failed

    Three Reasons Why Supply Chain Centers of Excellence Failed

    Over the past decade, I completed 51 quantitative surveys to better understand the drivers of supply chain excellence…

    60 Comments
  • Can Organizational Tension Help Us to Build Better?

    Can Organizational Tension Help Us to Build Better?

    Today, supply chain leaders are asked to cost-justify SAP's (RISE) re-platforming while redefining capabilities to…

    25 Comments
  • Supply Chain Learnings from the Olympics

    Supply Chain Learnings from the Olympics

    I am an avid fan of the Olympics. Watching it fills my evenings.

    36 Comments
  • Supply Chains Are Stuck. How Can You Help?

    Supply Chains Are Stuck. How Can You Help?

    As I sit and write the Supply Chains to Admire report for 2024, and I look at the data from the prior reports written…

    45 Comments
  • Is Your Supply Chain Hampered by Shiny Object Syndrome?

    Is Your Supply Chain Hampered by Shiny Object Syndrome?

    Supply chain leaders love shiny objects. The shiny object syndrome happens when teams focus undue attention on a new…

    41 Comments
  • A Tattoo For Health

    A Tattoo For Health

    At 70, I have my first tattoo. You will never see it, but it is there.

    17 Comments
  • Word Salad Spin

    Word Salad Spin

    Word salad is a term used to describe a confused or meaningless mixture of words and phrases. Supply chain leaders are…

    35 Comments
  • The Big Sigh

    The Big Sigh

    Every morning, I log into LinkedIn. Usually, I Sigh.

    113 Comments
  • Does Your Supply Chain Need a Dalmation?

    Does Your Supply Chain Need a Dalmation?

    Dalmatians are the unofficial mascot for firefighters in the United States. The reason? The Dalmatian breed loves to…

    35 Comments
  • Justification of Network Investments

    Justification of Network Investments

    I wrote a series of articles on how to build value in supply chain networks during the month of January. When I write…

    57 Comments

Explore topics