The Tactics of Parental Manipulation: Turning a Child Against a Loved One
To counter the dismissive rhetoric and raise awareness about the realities of parent-child trauma coerced attachment and alienation, this article presents a series of thought-provoking questions designed to help readers understand the dynamics of coercion and manipulation in these complex family situations.
Here, we will explore the complex dynamics that can contribute to strained or damaged parent-child relationships. The article examines how various forms of influence, manipulation, and learned behaviours can negatively impact a child's perception of a parent and ultimately hinder the development of a healthy and secure bond. It examines the power of lies, non-verbal cues, emotional appeals and rewards/punishments in shaping a child's understanding of their relationships.
The article highlights how isolation, fabricated stories, and the use of children as messengers or spies can contribute to a distorted reality for the child. The impact of learned behaviours, generational trauma, anxiety, cognitive distortions, and limited critical thinking skills are also explored as contributing factors to the breakdown of parent-child relationships. By understanding these dynamics, we can better recognise and address the potential for harm in these complex situations and work towards fostering healthier and more supportive environments for children.
Influence and Persuasion
FACTS:
Lies can distort a child's perception of a parent.
Non-verbal cues can be misinterpreted, leading to negative feelings towards a parent.
Children with weak boundaries can be easily manipulated through emotional appeals.
Rewards and punishments can be used to control a child's affections.
Fear of punishment can prevent a child from expressing their true feelings.
Children are susceptible to believing what adults tell them, even if it's untrue.
Relationships and Manipulation
FACTS:
Isolation from a parent can severely damage a child's support system and hinder their overall well-being.
Fabricated stories can create unwarranted sympathy and animosity towards a parent.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Children can be used to spy and gather information on a parent, which is a form of stalking and utilises the child as a proxy.
Using a child as a messenger can drag them into adult conflicts, hinder healthy communication, and taint the limited time they have with the other parent with interrogation and conflict.
Learned Behaviours and Intergenerational Patterns
FACTS
Children learn by observing and often mimic the behaviours of those around them, even if those behaviours are problematic or abusive.
Trauma can be passed down through generations, impacting parent-child relationships and other crucial aspects of a child's development.
Cognitive and Emotional Factors
FACTS
Parental anxiety can significantly affect a child's mental health and ability to interact with a parent, placing unnecessary stress on the child and impacting their mental health.
Distorted thinking can lead to false beliefs about a parent, potentially causing a child to reject a loving and supportive parent based on inaccurate information.
Lack of self-awareness can make it difficult to recognise harmful behaviours towards a parent, teaching the child that such behaviours are acceptable.
Limited critical thinking skills can make a child more vulnerable to manipulation and other forms of exploitation. When a child's world is filled with emotional input, lies, and a trauma bond, the potential for damage is significantly increased.
Understanding these complex dynamics that can lead to a child rejecting a parent or other family member is paramount to identifying behaviours that can be abusive when it comes to parent-child or parent-family relationships. By recognising the potential for manipulation, the subtle influences of learned behaviours, and the lasting impact of trauma, we can proactively build environments where children feel safe, loved and empowered to develop their own genuine bonds.
To learn more about parent-child trauma coerced attachment and alienation visit the Eeny Meeny Miney Mo Foundation.
The latest research can be found HERE.
Storyteller. Media and counselling trained communications professional. Respectfully living on Gubbi Gubbi land.
6moAs I read this I can't help but wonder about the ways in which the court system has, perhaps unwittingly, manufactured this as a scenario (to some extent). What if the parents couldn't argue about time spent with each parent because it was already predetermined? What if court automatically awarded the child's primary carer the majority of care? The other parent could then have every second weekend during (it is after all the quality of the time, not the quantity that matters). That might stop at least some of the animosity, manipulation and fighting. After all, if the parents are in such strong disagreement that they have to go to family court to resolve their issues in the first place - there is no way they will be able to co-parent effectively - and it is inevitable that the child will suffer in some way including, perhaps, being lied to and manipulated by at least one of the parents. NB: I say primary carer because this is NOT an issue about gender - it is an issue about what is in the best interests of the child.
Software Engineer (AI & Neuroscience)
6moI think I used this image in my dissertation image! My dissertation was about PA and autism!
Thank you for writing this article to spread awareness of this insidious situation! I have been on the receiving end of many of these tactics. Unfortunately, the tactics are powerful tools used on trusting children who have been manipulated to choose one parent over the other.