The Tactics of Parental Manipulation: Turning a Child Against a Loved One
Image Credit: iStock

The Tactics of Parental Manipulation: Turning a Child Against a Loved One

To counter the dismissive rhetoric and raise awareness about the realities of parent-child trauma coerced attachment and alienation, this article presents a series of thought-provoking questions designed to help readers understand the dynamics of coercion and manipulation in these complex family situations.

 Here, we will explore the complex dynamics that can contribute to strained or damaged parent-child relationships. The article examines how various forms of influence, manipulation, and learned behaviours can negatively impact a child's perception of a parent and ultimately hinder the development of a healthy and secure bond. It examines the power of lies, non-verbal cues, emotional appeals and rewards/punishments in shaping a child's understanding of their relationships.

The article highlights how isolation, fabricated stories, and the use of children as messengers or spies can contribute to a distorted reality for the child. The impact of learned behaviours, generational trauma, anxiety, cognitive distortions, and limited critical thinking skills are also explored as contributing factors to the breakdown of parent-child relationships. By understanding these dynamics, we can better recognise and address the potential for harm in these complex situations and work towards fostering healthier and more supportive environments for children.

Influence and Persuasion

  • Can someone's lies influence another person's perception of someone or something?
  • Can non-verbal cues, like rolling eyes, sighing, or body language, influence how someone perceives another person?
  • Can emotional appeals sway someone, particularly if they have weak personal boundaries?
  • Can bribes or rewards (monetary or emotional) motivate someone to do something they wouldn't normally do?
  • Can punishments deter someone from breaking rules, or laws or behaving in a certain way?
  • Can adults influence children to believe things that aren't true, even unintentionally?

FACTS:

Lies can distort a child's perception of a parent.

Non-verbal cues can be misinterpreted, leading to negative feelings towards a parent.

Children with weak boundaries can be easily manipulated through emotional appeals.

Rewards and punishments can be used to control a child's affections.

Fear of punishment can prevent a child from expressing their true feelings.

Children are susceptible to believing what adults tell them, even if it's untrue.


Relationships and Manipulation

  • Can adults isolate their partners from friends and family in relationships? What are the potential consequences of this isolation?
  • Can adults elicit empathy from others by sharing their experiences, regardless of whether those experiences are true or fabricated?
  • Can adults hire someone to investigate and gather information on another person? Why might someone do this?
  • Can an adult use another person to relay information to someone else, especially if they want to avoid direct communication? What are the potential impacts of this indirect communication?

FACTS:

Isolation from a parent can severely damage a child's support system and hinder their overall well-being.

Fabricated stories can create unwarranted sympathy and animosity towards a parent.

Children can be used to spy and gather information on a parent, which is a form of stalking and utilises the child as a proxy.

Using a child as a messenger can drag them into adult conflicts, hinder healthy communication, and taint the limited time they have with the other parent with interrogation and conflict.

 

Learned Behaviours and Intergenerational Patterns

  • Do people, especially children, often model behaviours they observe in their peers and family members?
  • Can trauma experienced by one generation be passed down and impact future generations? How might this manifest?

FACTS

Children learn by observing and often mimic the behaviours of those around them, even if those behaviours are problematic or abusive.

Trauma can be passed down through generations, impacting parent-child relationships and other crucial aspects of a child's development.

 

Cognitive and Emotional Factors

  • Can anxiety significantly impact how a person manages their life, interactions, and reactions to situations?
  • Do cognitive distortions (inaccurate or irrational thought patterns) affect the way people think, feel and behave?
  • Can people sometimes lack insight into their own thoughts and behaviours, even if those thoughts and behaviours are harmful to others?
  • Can someone lack critical thinking skills, making them more susceptible to manipulation or believing misinformation?

FACTS

Parental anxiety can significantly affect a child's mental health and ability to interact with a parent, placing unnecessary stress on the child and impacting their mental health.

Distorted thinking can lead to false beliefs about a parent, potentially causing a child to reject a loving and supportive parent based on inaccurate information.

Lack of self-awareness can make it difficult to recognise harmful behaviours towards a parent, teaching the child that such behaviours are acceptable.

Limited critical thinking skills can make a child more vulnerable to manipulation and other forms of exploitation. When a child's world is filled with emotional input, lies, and a trauma bond, the potential for damage is significantly increased.

 

Understanding these complex dynamics that can lead to a child rejecting a parent or other family member is paramount to identifying behaviours that can be abusive when it comes to parent-child or parent-family relationships. By recognising the potential for manipulation, the subtle influences of learned behaviours, and the lasting impact of trauma, we can proactively build environments where children feel safe, loved and empowered to develop their own genuine bonds.

To learn more about parent-child trauma coerced attachment and alienation visit the Eeny Meeny Miney Mo Foundation.

The latest research can be found HERE.

Aileen Wallace

Storyteller. Media and counselling trained communications professional. Respectfully living on Gubbi Gubbi land.

6mo

As I read this I can't help but wonder about the ways in which the court system has, perhaps unwittingly, manufactured this as a scenario (to some extent). What if the parents couldn't argue about time spent with each parent because it was already predetermined? What if court automatically awarded the child's primary carer the majority of care? The other parent could then have every second weekend during (it is after all the quality of the time, not the quantity that matters). That might stop at least some of the animosity, manipulation and fighting. After all, if the parents are in such strong disagreement that they have to go to family court to resolve their issues in the first place - there is no way they will be able to co-parent effectively - and it is inevitable that the child will suffer in some way including, perhaps, being lied to and manipulated by at least one of the parents. NB: I say primary carer because this is NOT an issue about gender - it is an issue about what is in the best interests of the child.

Like
Reply
Stephen Tierney

Software Engineer (AI & Neuroscience)

6mo

I think I used this image in my dissertation image! My dissertation was about PA and autism!

  • No alternative text description for this image
Like
Reply

Thank you for writing this article to spread awareness of this insidious situation! I have been on the receiving end of many of these tactics. Unfortunately, the tactics are powerful tools used on trusting children who have been manipulated to choose one parent over the other.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Amanda Sillars

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics