Training Magazine: Three Strategies to Ensure Your Training Has Tensile Strength
Originally published by Training Magazine, Summer 2016
Do you know when your onboarding, sales training or customer service curriculum will break, and why? Whether it’s external forces pushing your curriculum strategy to meet new business demands or internal forces pulling you apart due to lack of resources, you need to understand the effects of a brittle learning strategy.
According to Wikipedia, “Ultimate tensile strength is measured by the maximum stress that a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before breaking.” In our ideal world, maximum stress will be addressed via rigorous analysis, motivated subject matter experts’ feedback, and plenty of time for prototyping. This isn’t our reality though. As any battle-hardened training manager knows, there’s always some level of design guesswork, assumption, and too many cooks in our L&D kitchen.
Knowing, planning for and mitigating risk are perhaps the top, yet most underrated competencies for any learning leader. It’s one thing to build for scale and engagement; it’s another to ensure program and team sustainability. Here are three methods to consider when trying to predict or gauge a breaking point.
CONTENT PERISHABILITY
Does your content have an expiration date? All content has life. Some with vigor, vitality and lasting value. Some with a shorter lifespan, becoming inanimate with little learning value. How you determine and map your content perishability strategy will greatly inform your team, clients and planning.
For example, product content tends to have a shorter shelf life as new features are introduced or the interface changes. As we consider resource planning, we know that highly perishable product training content will require more engagement with management, and more production hours for upkeep. Non-technical content has much more durability and shelf life. That is, requiring fewer maintenance hours.
This isn’t a science of course, yet by tagging your content based on perishability you will have a clear and predictable understanding of what is brittle, and what will eventually break.
SPEED TRUMPS EFFICACY: LAUNCH EARLY AND ITERATE
The sooner you can release a new program, the sooner you’ll know when and how it will break. For many teams, the goal is perfection upon release, yet this often requires more time to get it right. Most importantly, your learners know best – not the business, subject experts or even your learning designers.
Recommended by LinkedIn
For most course formats, not everything needs to work (functionality), or be tidy (content) or be perfectly in sync (structure) at first release. It’s more important that the core intent is clearly stated and embedded, and students know what to expect. By gaining learners’ feedback as soon as possible, you’ll have a more accurate, valid and rapid set of instructions for updating the next version.
Once the program is formally deployed, allocate as much planning and effort on intentional iteration. This is a dedicated effort to carefully review feedback and metrics, re-engage with stakeholders and rapidly retire if necessary. Time for iterations should be prized just as high as new program development. When considering efficacy, time and speed become your greatest resource.
PRE-MORTEMS
Conducting a post-deployment meeting or post-mortem is a highly informative way to identify what went right or wrong after deploying a project. A pre-mortem is not the same.
The goal of a pre-mortem is to identify what can or will possibly go wrong during planning or pre-design. As Dave Grey highlights in Gamestorming: “Unlike a more formal risk analysis, the pre-mortem asks team members to directly tap into their experience and intuition.” Participants are encouraged to call out any elephant in the room or any sacred cow that hinders collaboration and attainment of goals. These sessions should be fun with a bit of gloom and doom, a focus on worse case scenarios and creatively identifying “disasters.”
Similar to launch early and iterate, conducting a pre-mortem will give you early insights to unforeseen problems and potential breaking points. By documenting and ranking any potential negative outcomes such as increased costs and waste, you’ll also gain credibility with sponsors and showcase the tensile strength of your team and practices.
Marc Ramos is the Head of Google Fiber Education and is a member of Training Industry Magazine’s Editorial Board.
L&D expert and AI-friendly UX/IA enthusiast dedicated to creating end-to-end experiences that are effective for teams, engaging for learners, and easy to implement and measure organization-wide
10mo"Most importantly, your learners know best – not the business, subject experts or even your learning designers." 💯
Content Leader | Content Strategy | Content Creation & Editing | Content Marketing | Digital Content | Thought Leadership | Team Leadership | Project Management
10moI love the concept of a pre-mortem, Marc. These aren't done nearly enough. I had a manager who used to called these pre- and post-partums. She liked to say that we need to understand the risks right after conception and review/celebrate what we delivered in the end. It's life or death, lol. 🙂
Teacher of Geeks | Inc. Magazine contributor | Children's book author | Speaker | Podcaster | Engineer | Follow & Ring My 🔔 for Technical Presentation Insights
10moHas tensile strength and resists shear stress. All these engineering terms…