Train Indexer – Best choice for railcar positioner: rack and pinion or wire rope and winch?
Introduction
In recent years, new improvements have emerged to streamline the process of positioning railcars and make them more efficient. The railcar positioner enables more productive operations in loading and unloading systems.
The use of locomotive to position the railcars into the Rotary Car-Dumper is slow, inefficient and inaccurate. The solution that has been developed is to apply an indexing positioner to move the railcars into the dumper barrel. Railcar positioners help reduce or eliminate demurrage rates, commonly associated with inefficient or slow unloading methods at export terminals, trans-load facilities, thermoelectric plants, and steel mills.
There are available two common methods for unloading railcars: the first method that we are talking about now, rotary dumpers, and the second method would be bottom dump railcars, by positioning a railcar over a hopper, open the gates at the bottom of the railcars, and all the material will be discharged.
Most of the automatic train handling facilities in the world use the rack and pinion positioner, countries such as United States, Australia and South Africa have this preference.
On the other hand, in Brazil the main end users, prefers the wire rope positioner, they are forceful in this choice and have solid arguments that motivated to support this option.
The average number of units installed in the world for each type of positioner, as per the report from Cognitive Market Research 2023, see website link in references at the end of this article, are:
Rack and Pinion Positioner : 145 units
Wire Rope and Winch Positioner : 29 units
Total units found : 174 units
This means the average proportion, in the year 2022, is 83% for rack and pinion and 17% for wire rope and winch.
So, let's address below these two types of positioners, comparing advantages, disadvantages and Installation and Operation & Maintenance costs.
Application
It is available a wide variety of configurations and features applied to random cars and unit trains, including different railcars in styles and sizes.
Railcars positioners include rack and pinion gear or wire rope and winch for traction capacities up to 200,000 Kgf. There are also smaller train positioners, with less than 50 cars, hydraulically driven.
Rail car indexers and positioners are designed to move railcars safely and efficiently, without the need for a locomotive. These devices are available in various sizes and configurations to meet the specific needs of the facility where they will be used.
A Unit Train positioner can sequentially advance a set of railcars to the Car Dumper, without the need to uncouple them during unloading. Each of the railcars has rotating couplings that allow rotation around its own longitudinal axis.
Benefits of using train positioners
Overall, railcars positioners offer several advantages over traditional railcars handling methods. They are faster, more accurate and safer, and can greatly improve the efficiency of railcars handling operations.
The main benefits of using train positioners are:
Rack and pinion positioner
The train positioners with rack and pinion gear equipped with several redundant drive units, see Figure 1.
Figure 1 – Rack and pinion positioner
The train positioner drive comprises a set of synchronized AC or DC motors,
vertically mounted planetary gearbox, caliper disc brake and an extended shaft and pinion at the bottom. Each planetary reducer is flanged to the top plate of the positioner car frame, the eccentricity allows simple adjustment of the optimum circumferential backlash for alignment of the pinions with the rack, see Figure 2a and 2b.
Figure 2a – Positioner Cartridge Vertical Drive
Figure 2b – 3D Positioner Cartridge Vertical Drive
The advantages of the Rack and Pinion Positioner are:
The disadvantages of the Rack and Pinion Positioner are:
Figure 3 – Rack gear assembly to move the positioner car
Recommended by LinkedIn
Wire rope and winch positioner
Wire rope - winch train positioners include capacities of up to 150 cars.
To move the train an arrangement of wire rope, bypass pulleys, rope reel drum, rope tensioner cylinder is used to move the positioner, see Figure 4.
Figure 4 – Wire rope and winch positioner
The advantages of the wire rope - winch positioner are:
The disadvantages of the wire rope positioner - winch are:
The rope haul positioner is shown on Figure 5.
Figure 5 – Rope haul positioner
VALE in Brazil is one of the largest users of wire rope positioner, after having installed 5 (five) Car-Dumpers in the Port of Tubarão - Vitória and 9 (nine) in the Port of Ponta da Madeira São Luís began to have a deep knowledge of the operation and maintenance of this type of equipment, to the point of having almost autonomy to describe each critical point, how to control and how to make repairs, in order to have continuity in the railway unloading operation, ensuring the volume of ore to be exported.
Installation and Operation & Maintenance Costs
A study of the involved costs for installation, operation and maintenance was developed to compare the application of Rack and Pinion Positioner vs Wire Rope and Winch Positioner.
The study was made for a train with 2 locos plus 140 railcars with a force applied on the arm positioner of 180.000 Kgf, and to verify the incurred costs during the 15 (fifteen) years of operation after the installation, see the Figure 6.
Figure 6 – Installation and Operation & Maintenance Costs for Train Positioners - Total Cost of Ownership
The purpose of the study is to find out the Total Cost of Ownership – TCO , what taking into consideration the purchase price of an equipment plus the costs of operation and maintenance.
Total cost of ownership is considered by companies when they are looking to buy assets and make investments in capital projects. For a business, the cost of purchase and the costs of operations and maintenance are often itemized separately on financial statements. The former is booked as a capital expenditure CAPEX, while the latter is part of operating OPEX expenditures. A comprehensive analysis of the cost of ownership is a common practice for businesses.
Conclusion
Rack and Pinion and Wire Rope Positioners each have relative merits, the following chart on Figure 7 provides a direct comparison of the two options:
Figure 7 – Comparison of the Rack and Pinion and Wire Rope Positioners
When choosing among alternatives in a purchasing decision, buyers often look at an items short-term price, known as its purchase price. However, they should also consider its long-term price, which is its total cost of ownership.
These are the long-term costs and expenses incurred during the product useful life and ultimate disposal. The item with the lower total cost of ownership can be the better value in the long run.
In our study regarding Rack-Pinion Positioner vs Wire Rope-Winch Positioner is to verify which option offers the lowest TCO – Total Cost of Ownership, which resulted in:
The breakeven point is reached in 4 (four) years of operation, it is a short time to save money during the life-cycle of the equipment.
References
Air Pollution Control System / Dust Collector - Estimation, Process Engineering, Design Engineering, Commissioning, Troubleshooting & Maintenance, +91-9910094332
1yThanks for sharing For any issue with Air Pollution Control equipment/system for any application, please contact, we may work together for mutual interest. 91-9910094332 Dustcontrolengineers@gmail.com