The Tuckman Model for team development & the importance of the forming stage
In the mid-1990s, after graduating from engineering school, I began my career as an Automation Engineer for Intel’s Technology Manufacturing Group under the leadership of Andy Grove, the company's CEO at the time. Andy was many things, but first and foremost, Andy was a visionary in leadership and technology management. To achieve Intel’s business goals, he recognized the importance of fostering a strong and cohesive team culture. He believed that a culture of trust, collaboration, and open communication was essential for driving innovation and maintaining Intel's competitive edge. So he championed a movement to move away from leadership through policy to leadership through culture. A culture that encouraged employees to challenge the status quo. A culture of transparency and accountability. And a culture that emphasized the value of learning and continuous improvement.
My introduction to this culture started during my first week in a class titled “Working at Intel.” A class that introduced employees to the key tenets of Intel’s culture, one of which was “Team Development.” It was based on the Tuckman Model for team development, a widely recognized framework that delineates the five sequential stages that teams typically go through as they progress and mature. If you haven’t heard of Dr. Bruce Tuckman, you have undoubtedly heard of his five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. While I never had the honor of meeting Dr. Tuckman, his contributions to improved efficiency and innovation are incalculable.
The first stage of the Tuckman Model, forming, is the starting point of any team and most importantly, it sets the foundation for the team's future dynamics and effectiveness. During this stage, team members are introduced to one another, and the team's goals and objectives are defined. Team members also begin the process of establishing their individual roles and responsibilities within the team structure.
But it has been my experience that leaders must be very careful during this stage. While leaders may help define roles and responsibilities, in a culture of true teamwork, the actual team members are the ones that TRULY establish their roles. Each team is different because each team member brings a unique set of skills and passions. So a certain amount of latitude must be given to the team to flex the roles to the unique team members abilities.
Recommended by LinkedIn
The importance of the forming stage cannot be overstated, as it lays the groundwork for the team's future development. The data shows that teams that are great at navigating the forming stage are more likely to progress smoothly through the subsequent stages and emerge as cohesive and high-performing units.
It’s been my experience that a few key strategies will help ensure the successful formation of a team:
So these have been some of my learnings, but I would love to hear from each of you on your experiences forming teams. What worked and what didn’t?
Head of AI & Data Product @ Intuit Mailchimp | Advisor, Investor
3moGreat perspectives! Thanks for sharing Lance Koenders
Great information Lance! Totally agree on #2: at Intel the leadership expectation was/is for managers to “make goals clear and important.” SMART goals that we called OKRs. In other companies I heard the same message articulated as: clarity and constancy of purpose. Clarity is the essence of good leadership. And the Tuckman Model is a great framework for leaders to establish clarity. Thanks for this important series of posts on teamwork. Looking forward to the next one.
Responsible AI & Privacy-Tech Evangelist | Podcast Host | Marathon Pull-Up Athlete
3moMy son always says, “teamwork makes the dream work!”
CEO of 43Twenty & The Streaming Wars | Content Marketing & Promotion for B2B Media & Entertainment Companies
3moGood stuff Lance! Hope you’re great man!!