Two Circle Theory of Leadership
I wrote an article on “what is leadership” a few weeks ago which became the most popular article I ever wrote with over forty thousand views, over 500 likes, and 100 shares. There is clearly a hunger for understanding leadership which for many is very abstract and difficult to personalize. I want to share with you a simple framework, I call it two circle theory of leadership, that I have shared with early career employees.
Regardless of where you are in life and what you do for a living, we all have a job scope. For each job, there comes with a job description, either written or more likely implicit. I call that scope the small circle. On the other hand, you most likely know that many things are completely outside of the scope of your job, defined by the space outside of the big circle. In an ideal world, the boundary would be clearly defined and the two circles would be the same. In real world however, those two circles do not overlap and there is always a gap between the two circles. When the job is well defined, the gap tends to be small. When the job is not as well defined, the gap can be very big. Regardless of the situation, how you handle the in-between space can define your success or failure in your career.
One can certainly focus on the small circle and do everything well within your defined boundary. On the other hand, it is also clear that you have to ask for permission first if you want to venture outside of the big circle. If you want to excel and be a leader, you have to be proactive and demonstrate your leadership in defining, leading, driving the activities between the two circles. The mistake early career employees often make is that they are afraid of taking initiatives outside of the small circle and would instead wait for instruction or ask for permission even when they have the capacity and capability to perform the tasks in the middle space. The right approach often requires employees to proactively engage their managers or simply take the initiative to perform the tasks.
There are ways to demonstrate leadership in any situation, but the in-between space is the best place to do so by forcing yourself to stretch your capability, learn new skills, establish your credibility, and expand your sphere of influence.
Related Article
What is Leadership (01/09/2021)
(Please join the 140,000 subscribers to my newsletter by clicking the subscribe button on the top of the article to be notified of new editions. Better yet, please join the conversation by sharing your comments. Thanks.)
Chairman of Board of Director for Palestinian Trainers Association (PETA), The Director of the of Entrepreneurship & Business Development Centre (EBDC) at Chamber of Commerce & Ind. Ramallah AlBireh Governorate
2yI think the Two Circle Theory of Leadership motivate to be proactive out of our roles.
People and Culture Specialist| DEI Champion| Talent Strategist| CPO| People Analyst| Job Analyst|SMBA|MZIM
3yGreat theory Xinjin Zhao . We definitely need to do more in making the circle 🔵 one big one and collapse the two circles. This represents an internal and external awareness. Delving into the borderless zone is unrestricted and daring. Leadership is all about dealing with complexity.
Making Business Change a Success
3yYou have clearly hit on my favourite subject. What are the LIMITS of your responsibility and accountability. Job descriptions are at the heart of this and rarely meet the fullest of detail. They contain Hard skills, Soft skills and the final one - competence levels. This should cover the point about poor leaders who operate outside of their competence level and impact on the lives of others. Incompetence is not a factor of good leadership and should be shunned by those impacted.
--
3yI'll keep this in mind
Retired Faculty at University of Tabriz - Academic Leadership
3yA great idea .Suppose you're a dependent chair at Management Faculty. Please explain in simple example how you are going to stretch your capabilities between two circles .Thanks .