Un-FARE

It's no secret that almost everybody hates real estate agents (until they need one). We're an easy scapegoat for the increase in housing costs, and thanks to a few industry influencers, we have created a public persona that has a serious "ick" factor.

I'm the first to agree that parts of our industry can certainly be improved. Still, good agents are grossly undervalued, and our role in the industry needs to be understood. We are the cog in the wheel that keeps everything moving. Without us, people would have difficulty getting into a home they want to live in for a price they can afford - especially in New York City.

For every deal you see us close, know that a hundred fell apart.

For every apartment bought, there were countless others in which the buyer said no to buying. 

For every home sold, many never found a buyer.

This job ain't easy! 

In all honesty, the brokerage industry needs better ambassadors to educate the public about what we do and our value, but that's a topic for another Padkos.  Instead of looking to cut commissions, these watchdog organizations trying to protect the consumer should demand a higher standard of conduct, not a lazy shortcut that hurts the people they are trying to help. 

This week, the New York City Council passed the Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses Act (Fare), making it illegal for an agent to collect a fee from a tenant. Under this new law, landlords will have to cover broker fees in New York City instead of having the tenants pay. Whoever hires the broker will have to pay them.  

Sounds good in theory, right? But here's how this will play out in real life:

  • Landlords need agents to rent their apartments. 
  • Agents don't work for free.
  • Landlords will have to pay agents. 
  • So, landlords will raise their rent to cover the fee. (I know this because every landlord I have spoken with has told me this is exactly what they plan to do.)
  • Therefore, the tenant will pay a higher rent to cover the cost of the brokerage commission.

To add insult to injury, the tenant will now only have representation if they hire an agent to advocate for them.  So, now their rent will be higher, AND they will have to hire an agent and pay them or have no representation at all.

Best case the tenant is paying exactly what they paid before and worst case they are paying double. Doesn't sound too "FARE" to me. 

Side Bar:  Here's a quote I'm pondering......"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people." - Eleanor Roosevelt

Let's Do This! 

Shaun

Najmul Abedin

Professional Virtual Assistant on Data Entry, Lead Generation & Web Research at Fiverr.

1mo

Well said Shaun

Like
Reply
Eric Rosen

Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker at Compass

1mo

What was extremely disturbing was some of the actual language used by supporters of the new law when describing real estate professionals and companies. The extreme amount of hatred was cause for concern and the fact that they said it publicly with no hesitation should be a real warning sign for the residential real estate professionals in NYC. When they also stated that there are a lot "more of us" (meaning supporters of the new law) than "them" (meaning real estate professionals) and the fact that the law passed with a supermajority in the city council is just one more disturbing fact.

Aramis Arjona

Life Planning CEO, Certified in Science Based Sales®... Bilingual Real Estate Pro since 2009

1mo

Shaun, you nailed it. Agents might be the scapegoats, but we’re also the unsung heroes of this complicated ecosystem. It’s ironic how the ‘Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses Act’ assumes that shifting the cost from one pocket to another actually fixes the problem.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Shaun Osher

  • Let's Do This - For LA

    Let's Do This - For LA

    Catastrophes have a way of showing us the spectrum of human nature, from resilience and kindness to fear and…

  • Your Home Alone

    Your Home Alone

    Happy New Year, and welcome to the first Padkos of 2025! As we step into this fresh chapter, I can't help but reflect…

    4 Comments
  • 2025: A Year to Redefine Real Estate

    2025: A Year to Redefine Real Estate

    After three decades in real estate, I can confidently say that 2024 was one for the books—but not in a good way. We've…

    23 Comments
  • Greatest Hits: 2024 Edition

    Greatest Hits: 2024 Edition

    It’s that time of year again—the wrap-up season! This year’s “greatest hits” list feels a little different, and that’s…

    2 Comments
  • Dollars and Scents

    Dollars and Scents

    As marketers and salespeople, we often fall in love with adjectives. But let’s be honest—many words that once packed a…

    5 Comments
  • The Science of Small Things

    The Science of Small Things

    Small things lead to big differences. I’ve bought many things in my life and sold a lot of real estate in my career…

    2 Comments
  • You Need to Calm Down

    You Need to Calm Down

    Real estate agents get the same question from their clients every four years. Usually, a month before the presidential…

    4 Comments
  • Angel Left His Mark

    Angel Left His Mark

    In 2003, I found myself working on a project at the corner of Park Avenue South and 21st Street, where the old United…

    3 Comments
  • A Fresh Start

    A Fresh Start

    More than two years ago, I wrote a blog entry on Padkos that was titled: "Hurricanes Don't Give A Damn About Your…

  • Time to Step Up

    Time to Step Up

    Everyone has an explanation for the housing market problem plaguing our country. Just this past week, the Senator from…

    5 Comments

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics