Unleashing Sustainable Growth: Lessons from China's Economic Evolution

China's economic trajectory over the past few decades has been remarkable, positioning it as a global powerhouse. However, relying solely on past successes as an indicator of future growth would be unwise, as historical trends do not guarantee perpetual prosperity. This article explores a comprehensive solution approach that can be applied to both developed and developing economies, drawing insights from China's economic evolution. By dissecting each stage and considering various scenarios, we can gain a lucid understanding of potential outcomes.

Stage 1: Early Development Model

China, like its East Asian counterparts such as South Korea and Taiwan, initially adopted an East Asian development model. This model encompassed land reform, egalitarian policies, and prioritizing agriculture and light industry to create widespread employment opportunities. Universal education and an emphasis on exports were integral components. Furthermore, substantial investments in infrastructure and heavy industry were made, alongside gradual price liberalization, heightened competition, and market opening. Centralized hierarchical control was also a key feature.

.

Lessons for Developing Nation

Developing nations can adopt the early development model by prioritizing agricultural and light industrial sectors to create widespread employment opportunities. Promoting land reform and egalitarian policies can contribute to equitable growth. Emphasizing exports and investing in infrastructure can boost economic development. Gradual liberalization of prices, heightened competition, and market opening can stimulate innovation and efficiency. However, it's crucial to balance centralized control with decentralized decision-making to effectively manage a diverse society

Stage 2: Fear-driven Economic Model

China's economic model under President Xi has been driven by fear, particularly shaped by the lessons learned during the global financial crisis. The crisis demonstrated the advantages of central control over banks and major companies. Consequently, Chinese leaders concluded that central political control trumped Western models, albeit primarily in crisis management rather than during normal times.

Lessons for Developing Nation

While crisis management is essential, developing nations should be cautious about adopting a fear-driven economic model as a long-term strategy. Instead, they can focus on studying and learning from China's crisis management techniques while emphasizing the importance of market-oriented reforms during normal economic conditions. This approach can help strike a balance between central control and market forces, fostering sustainable growth.

Stage 3: Challenges and Shifts

China's super growth was predominantly fueled by property, infrastructure, and urbanization, but these sources are nearing exhaustion. Similarly, technological catch-up has become increasingly difficult. As the service sector assumes dominance in the economy, its competitiveness lags behind that of Chinese manufacturing due to protectionist measures. Furthermore, the lengthy process of amortizing debt from property and infrastructure bubbles, as well as local government excesses, will require many years. Concurrently, China's workforce started declining in 2015, and the costs associated with an aging population will escalate rapidly. Additionally, a significant portion of China's population remains outside the modern world.

Lessons for Developing Nation

Developing nations should anticipate and address the challenges faced during this stage. Prioritizing diversification and sustainable growth drivers beyond property, infrastructure, and urbanization is crucial. Investing in technological advancements and nurturing the service sector while promoting competitiveness can pave the way for economic transformation. Additionally, managing debt levels and addressing demographic shifts, such as an aging population, should be integral parts of the strategy. Embracing bottom-up innovations and encouraging private sector growth can enhance productivity and foster economic dynamism.

The various scenarios for Chinese development over the decades are explained below

Scenario 1: High Growth and Differentiation

Following this development model, these economies experienced an impressive annual growth rate of 10% for a generation. The resulting success led to the emergence of a highly differentiated society, characterized by large private companies, influential interest groups, and an abundance of financially and educationally empowered individuals. As aspirations transcended mere sustenance, managing such a diverse society centrally and hierarchically became increasingly challenging.

Scenario 2: Political Stress and Financial Distress

The period of high growth eventually gave rise to political dissidence, criticisms from private-sector leaders, financial difficulties for government-connected firms, and a mounting national debt problem. These challenges were analogous to those faced by the earlier East Asian dragons. However, unlike their approach of accommodating complexity through market-oriented reforms and democratic processes, China, under President Xi Jinping, opted for intensified hierarchy and centralization. Fear and security concerns began eroding the priority for growth.

Scenario 3: Declining Total Factor Productivity

Sustainable growth ultimately hinges on rising total factor productivity. However, China has witnessed a two-thirds collapse in this crucial measure. Historically, bottom-up innovations have been the primary drivers of productivity growth, while top-down innovations have played a lesser role. Unfortunately, current policies emphasize top-down innovation, inadvertently stifling the bottom-up creativity that fuels growth. The fear of anticorruption accusations has paralyzed the bureaucracy, further impeding progress. Although the private sector contributes the most to growth, credit and investment in this sector have declined substantially due to the state sector's preferential treatment.

Conclusion:

Assuming the persistence of Xi's economic structure, China's growth is expected to slow down to the rate of the earlier East Asian dragons, settling at around 3%. The security policies implemented by Xi will further diminish this growth rate. Despite this slowdown, China will still be one of the world's largest economies, necessitating global engagement. However, without structural changes, China is unlikely to reach income and technological levels comparable to the United States, the European Union, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. As such, other countries constrained by China today will gain broader geopolitical space and grow at a faster pace, potentially altering the global power balance.

Emphasizing inclusive development, promoting innovation, striking a balance between central control and market forces, and addressing challenges proactively can pave the way for sustainable economic growth. It's essential for these nations to continuously reassess and adjust their strategies as circumstances evolve, ensuring resilience and adaptability in the face of change.