Unveiling the Silent Threat: How Internal Auditors Can Safeguard Against Fraud Risks
RAMESHCHANDRAN VADALI
Seasoned Professional with a mastery in Internal Auditing, Risk Management, and Compliance Control | Consultant for Family Businesses and MSMEs | Implemented Risk Management for Clients
Why are even the best fraud controls useless without active oversight from internal audit? What happens when internal auditors underestimate the importance of fraud risk governance?
Segregation of Duties (SoD): Ensure critical processes (e.g., payment approvals, payroll) involve multiple individuals to reduce opportunities for fraud.
Access Controls: Limit system and data access to authorized personnel only and periodically review user access rights.
Whistleblower Mechanism: Establish a confidential and secure system for reporting suspicious activities without fear of retaliation.
4. Fraud Risk Awareness Training: Conduct regular training for employees and management to recognize red flags and understand fraud policies.
5. Code of Ethics and Conduct: Develop, communicate, and enforce a strong ethical framework that outlines unacceptable behaviors and consequences.
6. Data Analytics Tools: Use advanced data analytics to monitor transactions for anomalies, patterns, and trends indicative of fraud.
7. Continuous Monitoring: Implement systems for real-time monitoring of key processes and activities, such as expense claims and vendor payments.
8. Vendor and Customer Due Diligence: Conduct thorough checks on external entities to prevent collusion or fake transactions.
9. Internal Audit Plan Integration: Integrate fraud risk assessment into the internal audit plan to ensure regular reviews and identification of vulnerabilities.
10. Fraud Response Plan: Create a documented plan for investigating and responding to suspected fraud incidents swiftly and effectively.
11. Tone at the Top: Ensure leadership actively promotes integrity, transparency, and accountability across the organization.
12. Audit Trails and Documentation: Maintain detailed records of transactions and approvals to support investigations if needed.
13. Rotational Assignments: Periodically rotate employees in key roles to deter long-term fraud schemes.
14. Periodic Fraud Risk Assessments: Regularly assess the organization’s fraud risk profile to identify new threats and implement timely controls.
Time a Chief Audit Executive (CAE) Should Spend on Fraud Risk Activities
The time spent by a CAE on fraud risk governance depends on the organization's complexity, size, and risk exposure. A recommended allocation:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Strategic Oversight (10–15%):
Establish fraud risk governance frameworks, policies, and strategic oversight.
Collaborate with senior leadership to ensure fraud risk is a priority.
Fraud Risk Assessment (20–25%):
Lead or oversee fraud risk assessments periodically (e.g., annually or biannually).
Identify vulnerabilities and ensure mitigation strategies are in place.
Monitoring and Review (15–20%):
Review internal audit plans to ensure adequate fraud coverage.
Monitor the implementation of fraud controls and assess their effectiveness.
Stakeholder Engagement (10%):
Communicate findings to the board, audit committee, and management.
Provide guidance and recommendations for improving fraud risk management.
Training and Awareness (5–10%):
Conduct fraud awareness training sessions for internal audit staff and other stakeholders.
By dedicating 20–25% of their time specifically to fraud risk assessment and another 30–35% to related oversight and monitoring activities, the CAE ensures that the organization remains vigilant and prepared to manage fraud risks effectively.