Update on Uruguay's Citizenship and Nationality Reform: Events Since March 2024 IACHR Hearing
The Uruguayan association Somos Todos Uruguayos has updated the website that documents a series of significant meetings and commitments made by the Uruguayan State regarding the rights of legal citizens, with a particular focus on issues related to passports and identification documents. These communications span from March to September 2024, highlighting the ongoing dialogue between civil society organizations and various government entities to address discrepancies in the treatment of legal citizens and to align national practices with international standards.
The updated website showing the lack of substantive progress is available at https://www.cidh189nacionalidad.uy/registro-de-progreso. I encourage you to review it, even after reading the summary I am posting here.
These updates are the result of the pivotal moment that occurred on March 1, 2024, during the 189th Regular Session of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) in Washington, D.C., where representatives presented concerns about legal citizens' rights, nationality, and statelessness risks. The Uruguayan delegation committed to collaborating on solutions and engaging in interministerial dialogue. This hearing catalyzed ongoing communications throughout 2024 involving government entities, civil society organizations, and international bodies. Key issues include aligning documents with ICAO standards, eliminating discriminatory language, harmonizing laws for equal treatment, and interpreting nationality and citizenship constitutionally considering international standards. These efforts culminated in significant events in August and September 2024, reflecting the challenges in resolving complex nationality, citizenship, and human rights issues in Uruguay.
Recommended by LinkedIn
August and September Events:
This summary of the events following the audience highlights the ongoing efforts, challenges, and divergent approaches in addressing the rights of legal citizens in Uruguay, particularly concerning nationality and identification documents. It underscores the tension between proposed constitutional reforms and the urgency of aligning national practices with international standards, as emphasized by both civil society organizations and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
Clearly, human rights and compliance with the American Convention are not optional for Uruguay. Putting human rights and compliance with international law to a plebiscite under the banner of needing to amend the Constitution is unacceptable. In light of these delaying tactics, already rejected in other cases by the IACHR and IACtHR, the association marches onward in preparing further actions.