U.S. Health Care Gone Wrong- A Pictorial Guide Part Two: Who Are The Players?
This is a continuation of a four part series looking at a pictorial guide to health care in the U.S.
I'm a practicing physician in Reno, Nevada and have been doing so for 30 years. I've worked in 3 different health systems I've been a part of U.S. Health Care for the past 15 years and watched healthcare change from the pinnacle of success for a developed nation to becoming a murky, expensive a fight amongst corporate entities for more dollars. Where did we go wrong? Let’s see if we can unravel how we went from nightingale floors and charge nurses with clipboards who rounded with physicians to EMRs, denials of care and bloated co-pays.
This is Part Two of a Four Part series looking at American Health Care. Part One looked at defining the problem; the problem in a nutshell is we pay too much and get too little. In this article, Part Two, I will look at who are the players. Part Three will show what tactics the players use that drive up the cost of health care. Finally, in Part Four we will look at potential solutions.
The following is a clickable guide to show this graphically so you can see the source of the chart or graphic.
Breaking down US Health Care expenditure, about 32% is paid to hospitals with physicians comprising up to 16% of health care expenditure. Medications make up 10%.:
This is what patients and consumers think drives expenses in health care:
If we breakdown the stakeholders into the big four, physicians, pharma (drug companies), hospitals and payers (health insurance companies) a clearer picture emerges of where the money goes. It's a start but not the only reason for the expense.
1. Physicians:
We said before that physicians contribute up to 15% of the health care spending. Is that really true? Add up all the physicians salaries and work it out as a percentage of health care spending and the real number is close to 7%:
Most lay people think that physicians earn too much. On a dollar basis they are in the top 1-5% of the country and higher than most other countries. The data is a little old but it the same message, physicians are generally paid more in the US than other countries:
There is a lot that is not covered in these numbers which include typical workdays, malpractice coverage, years to train and practice expenses which for most private practices sit at 50% of total revenue and up.
Take every dollar, cut it in half. Give half of the rest to the tax man. Rest is the docs. If you look at the raw salary number it gives a bloated figure. Also in most other countries medical education is subsidized.
In my community take home salary for my specialty (myself included) dropped 50% in just 5 years. Just this week I am told the local trauma center has effectively cut hospitalists salaries by 40%. I started medical school age 19. I did my first surgery as a specialist age 35. These things need to be taken into account.
Despite public perception, physician comprise a small part of government spending on healthcare, about 16% if it's indeed that high, Practice costs have risen and real incomes have dropped. Most physicians have noted staggering rise in practice costs not matched by reimbursement. Physicians are not the problem.
The Government uses a conversion factor to work out what to pay physicians for medicare patients. Medicare rates are now the benchmark for most commercial payers. In real terms this has fallen so effectively what physicians are getting paid over the past 10 years has fallen:
If I send a bill the dollar value is pretty much ignored by a payer. Nowadays payers use medicare rates as the benchmark. Some may pay 150% of medicare, some have offered 85% of medicare. As the effective rate of medicare payments have dropped this means the amount paid by commercial payers has dropped. I worked harder in 2019 than 5 and 10 years ago, on sicker patients and got paid significantly less.
As we will discussed above, physicians start earning at a later time in life with long pathways to training, are saddled with loans of 100s of thousands of dollars and have high operating expenses in private practice due largely to the bureaucratic requirements of payers. Below is an interesting comparison:
It is interesting that if physicians are paid so well and the job is so rewarding why are there less and less? Think about when you see your doctor. Do you spend more time with the MA or a mid level? That's becoming the new norm and medicine loses more and more skilled physicians and many retire early. Most jobs where the pay and conditions are good get oversupplied pretty quickly. This is the projected physician shortage in America which has already started:
So, physicians are = 13-16% of health care expenses in the US at most. Some say it's less. Cutting physicians salaries will not solve the problem but may make the physician shortage worse.
At some stage as physician numbers fall, quality will fall, but costs will keep rising:
Physicians are the last bastion of advocacy for the patients. The have been gradually disempowered.
Greater than 50% of physicians in America are now hospital employed, effectively muzzling them against speaking out for fear of job loss.
Burnout has become a key issue for physicians, many repulsed by the corporatization of medicine and health care delivery:
In short, as health care costs have bloated, physicians salaries have dropped.
Physicians have become disempowered, are mostly employed and muzzled and cannot advocate for patients.
An argument made my payers is that physicians will over-order tests, and this is partly driven by the litigious nature of U.S. medical practice and patient expectations. Note that it is rarely for personal financial gain.
It's not the doctors that are making health care so expensive in the U.S.
2. Pharma:
Drug pricing is a huge burden on the US consumer. We all feel it and we all know it. The growth is spending on drug price is matching clinical services:
Drug manufacturers do very well in the US. Drug prices are often the highest in the world and total spending on drug.
The U.S. is a cash cow for drug companies, bringing in more revenue than the rest of the world combined:
Regulatory control by the FDA mean the delivery of drugs is complex.
Note all the links in the chain. It is not transparent. There are middlemen who don't make the drugs and don't sell them but these middlemen (Pharmacy Benefit Managers PBMs) make the most, probably an unnecessary administrative burden we don't need. Despite, this we know that drug manufacturers have high margins and do better than most other industries:
Drug companies will make many arguments including money spent on drugs that never make it to market, covering drug costs in less developed nations etc.
Despite the claims that significant portions of revenue are spent on research and development, most pharmaceutical budgets are spent on marketing:
Across the board for major pharmaceuticals the spending on research and development is less than we are lead to believe:
There was a time that U.S. consumers could get scripts filled in Canada and get them sent to the U.S. That no longer happens.
The arguments put forth (mostly by pharma and it's representatives) were below but really big pharma did not want to lose revenue:
The truth is closer to this:
Finally the Government lets them get away with it by not negotiating drug prices, something that happens in other countries.
What can we conclude? Simply this: pharma does very well in the US. and the profits of drug companies are a big reason as to why health care is so expensive.
3. Health Insurance Companies/Payers:
This is what our health insurance system feels like:
Payers and their administrators continue to post record profits:
The cost to us as a consumer of accessing that care has exploded as wages creep up slowly:
Our premiums and out of pocket have increased dramatically. So have payer profits:
It's not rocket science to link the two:
Just follow the money:
If we look at billing and insurance-related (BIR) activities, the private insurers have also created the biggest burden:
In their quest to maximize profits and reduce services the private insurers have created a complicated web of prior authorizations and hurdles to health care necessitating more administrative burden for every sector. This is driven by the payers who make bank but drive up costs.
Waste now occurs at every level. The complexity, layering, bureaucratic burdening and various agendas create conflicting objectives which fuel delays and denials and foster waste. The system is asking for an administrative burden that pushes up costs.
Health Insurance Companies/payers are a big reason why health care is so expensive.
4. Hospitals:
The delivery of health care in the US is both complicated and expensive.
The Rise of the Administrative Sector- bureaucracy has meant that hospitals have many layers of managers, directors, vice-presidents and boards members, most of whom are rewarded well financially:
Hospitals as "Not-For-Profits" (NFP) get exemptions from local, state and federal taxes yet most NFP hospitals put only a portion of what they save back into the community with no accountability:
Whilst smaller community hospitals struggle, with many closing, larger health networks are very profitable and are thus able to expand further:
60% of U.S. hospitals are listed as NFP. This allows these hospitals to gain significant tax concessions in terms of local, county, state and federal taxes. This huge windfall is not balanced by the provision of care to those unable to afford it. The hospitals expand, pay their administrators exceedingly well and work on a 3-4% margin after they have accounted for their bonuses, expansions, administrative expansions, retreats and salaries.
You have to ask why does it cost more per day in a Nevada 'not-for-profit' hospital than a 'for-profit' hospital?
I repeated the graphic and link below to emphasize the point that it's not just CEOs of drug companies that are doing well but also CEOs of health insurance companies and large hospital systems. As pointed out before, health care CEOs are doing generally very well:
In many communities, the CEO of a health care system is paid higher than the top physician. Want to find out? Click below, type in the name of your NFP and look at salaries on the form 990:
Hospitals have been mandated to be transparent on pricing. When hospitals send outrageous bills, payers often pay the bill sometimes discounted, sometimes the full bill. Consumers don't get the luxury:
Revealing the chargemaster billing is now legislated but look at the penalties if they don't comply.
"If a hospital were to be assessed the maximum penalty for an entire year, it would owe $109,500 for failing to comply."
Try and find and navigate the chargemaster to work out what things cost:
There needs to be real transparency on pricing for procedures. If you can find it, the same procedure can cost wildly different amounts depending on where it gets done, independent of surgeon or anesthesia charges:
Hospitals thrive on this lack of transparency. If we don’t know what we are paying and can’t shop for better pricing then we are at their mercy in terms of charges. Just take a look at any bill we get. It is the antithesis of capitalism- the free market does not get to control prices and the lack of transparency is deliberate.
Hospitals margins are the best in decades:
Hospitals are also charging more than ever:
Hospitals depend on commercial payers for viability:
In short, hospitals are a part of the piece of why health care is so expensive. "Not-for-profit" is a fallacy. Payers do well and are to a point aided and abetted by payers and vice-versa. An excellent overview is provided below:
5. The Government
The Government overseas health care and is it's biggest client. More and more commercial payer are dependent on Medicare and Medicaid for it's revenue.
The government has the power to legislate and intervene but rarely does in a meaningful way. Pharma, hospitals and payers have the most money spent on lobbyists and the amounts spent are staggering:
Physicians have weak lobbyists compared to pharma and payers:
The group of three, hospitals, payers and pharma do not want change:
Federal law prohibits the Federal Government from negotiating drug prices with a non-intereference clause in The Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) which stipulates that the HHS Secretary “may not interfere with the negotiations between drug manufacturers and pharmacies and PDP sponsors, and may not require a particular formulary or institute a price structure for the reimbursement of covered part D drugs.” In effect, this provision means that the government can have no direct role in negotiating or setting drug prices in Medicare Part D. Note that the VA system has managed to get better drug pricing:
6. Big Tech- The Future
Health care is big business. As we pointed out in Part One, If U.S. Health Care was a country, it would be the 5th largest country in the world, bigger than the Gross Domestic Products (GDPs) of over 188 countries. There is money to be made and middle America is a like an ATM for some.
Big Tech is Coming: Is it any surprise that Apple and Google want to enter health care given the potential profits? The target will be our health records, health data and our genetic data.
All 3 companies see profits to be made. Access to data is their goal. The complexity of US health care delivery is such that patient data from it’s entry is transferred and traded in many ways:
Our data is valuable and is not as secure as we think.
A lot of it is already being bought and sold. Right now the gains to us are not clear.
6. Conclusion
Health care in the U.S. is a big, big business. Hospitals, payers, physicians do well. Hospital systems are doing very well while smaller hospitals fold. Payers are doing exceedingly well. Pharma does very well. Pharma, payers and hospitals have the best lobbyists and spend the most in Washington. They don't want things to change. Why would they? Physician real and effective salaries have declined. They have poor lobbyists and are the last unabashed advocate for patients. Nurses are in the same boat:
Why is the U.S. Health Care system so expensive? One word. Greed. The greed of corporate America. I'm looking at you- Blue Cross, United Health Care, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson and the "not-for-profit' health systems and probably soon Apple, Amazon and Google.
Next:Part 3- U.S. Health Care Gone Wrong: How Is the Cost of Health Care Driven Up?
Partnering with innovative health benefit advisors and self-funded employers | Delivering DIRECT relationships with high-quality doctors | High-Quality Care, Transparent Prices, Significant Savings
2yThanks for this 4 part analysis. I especially like the recommendation for more transparent markets!
Father | Husband | Neurosurgeon | Hockey Fan | Innovator | Inventor | Educator | ΒΓΣ | Health Care Leader |
4yGreat comments Joan and thank you for reading! I think physicians were paid well and busy. The focussed on patient care and little less. We let this happen. Like nursing, patients came first. Many are walking with their feet. Many retire early. Those we are employed fear losing their jobs. It's not good.
Outreach, Career Success, Partnerships, Executive Education
4yLali, this is an impressive breakdown. Thanks for educating me!
CXO | PRIVATE COMPANY BOARD DIRECTOR & BOARD ADVISOR | DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION | OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENT | PROFITABLE GROWTH | SAAS | LIFE SCIENCES | MANUFACTURING | AUTHOR | SPEAKER
4yLali, I liked how you broke out the costs into the pie to show all the players. You missed medical device manufacturers, which is part of the hospital costs. In your example for hips/knees, 45% of that cost is the medical device for the surgical procedure. Device costs go up every year, usually more so than pharmaceuticals. That is worth mentioning. The other point worth mentioning is that healthcare in the US is a federally subsidized (Medicare and Medicaid are now >= 60%) monopoly coupled with the fact that there are too many intermediaries between the patient and the manufacturers (drugs and devices). When you factor in those two with the other players (insurance, physicians, hospitals, etc) there are markup fees/percentages all through the patient care delivery chain that increase costs. For example, if a total knee implant costs $500, by the time it gets implanted, the cost to the patient could be 9-10 times the cost. Asking why is the first step to solving the problem. When all those players have their hand in a government subsidized monopoly, that status quo will be hard to change.