Are we building information exchangers or middle-level management?

In the modern business environment, the position of mid-level manager is an intriguing one within the hierarchy of the organisation. The ideal situation would be for these managers to be in charge of guiding their teams, resolving issues at the ground level, and establishing an effective bridge between upper management and front-line employees. A growing trend, on the other hand, suggests that a significant number of mid-level managers are increasingly functioning as mere conduits for transmission of information. They receive complaints from customers or employees, then they pass those complaints up the chain to upper management, and then they relay the responses back to the customers. Frequently, they do not add any value or make decisions on their own. The occurrence of this phenomenon gives rise to a significant inquiry: Do mid-level managers actually manage, or do they merely serve as information exchanges?

As an example, consider the limited role that a corporate manager plays.

Take, for example, the situation of a mid-level manager working for a large technology company called "Invigorate Corporation," where the primary functions include providing customer service and technical support. Despite the fact that he is responsible for supervising a group of support specialists, this manager frequently finds himself inundated with escalated cases. When customers have problems that require immediate attention, such as billing errors, contract adjustments, or technical glitches that impact service, they approach him directly with their concerns. Instead of directly addressing these issues, however, the manager's role is largely limited to referring them to senior management or specialised teams for resolution. This is the case rather than directly addressing them.

For example, a customer who was experiencing recurrent service interruptions approached this manager in an effort to rapidly find a solution. Despite the fact that the manager had documented the client's complaints and submitted a report to higher management, they were unable to directly intervene because they lacked both the authority and the resources to do so. Following a period of several days during which he waited for a response, he simply informed the customer of the decision made by management. Due to the fact that the manager was unable to provide solutions that were both timely and effective, the client experienced frustration and a loss of trust as a result of the delay.

The "Information Relay" Phenomenon: An Explanation For Understanding It

This particular case is not exclusive to Invigorate Corporation. Medium-level managers are frequently caught in this cycle, acting as intermediaries rather than empowered decision-makers. This phenomenon occurs across all sectors of the American economy.

This information relay phenomenon is caused by a number of factors, including the following:

1. Centralised Decision-Making: Many businesses place a high priority on centralised control in order to guarantee that they adhere to policies and procedures in a consistent manner. This, in turn, prevents mid-level managers from exercising their autonomy. Due to the fact that upper management must give their final approval on the majority of matters, this approach leaves managers with very little authority to resolve issues using their own initiative.

2. Risk Aversion and Compliance: Companies frequently operate under stringent compliance protocols, particularly in industries that are regulated, such as the healthcare or financial sectors. For the purpose of preventing potential violations of compliance or costly errors, mid-level managers are given the instruction to defer decision-making to higher levels. This helps to cultivate a culture in which senior managers avoid taking the initiative.

3. Rigid Standard Operating Procedures: The policies and procedures of a company frequently dictate stringent guidelines for dealing with a variety of situations. As a result of these rigid frameworks, the flexibility of mid-level managers is severely restricted, and they are reduced to performing little more than acting as conduits for standardised responses rather than actively solving problems.

4. Fear of Accountability: Many businesses have established environments in which the fear of repercussions discourages mid-level managers from making decisions on their own initiative. It is because of this that managers choose to "play it safe" by elevating problems to higher levels, which ultimately results in a culture of passivity and caution.

Aspects of the Information Relay System That Have an Impact

However, the transition away from empowered management and towards an information relay system results in significant challenges, including the following:

1. A Destruction of the Trust of Customers: Customers anticipate prompt responses and solutions from representatives of corporations. Customers may have the impression that managers are ineffective or untrustworthy when they consistently defer to higher authorities. This perception can, over time, make customers less satisfied with the brand and less loyal to the brand.

2. A decrease in employee engagement and confidence: Employees frequently look to their managers for direction, support, and leadership. It is possible for employees to lose confidence in their leaders when managers are unable to make decisions, which can result in disengagement and a decrease in morale.

3. Inefficiencies within the Organisation: The process of relaying information between multiple layers of management can result in significant delays in the resolution of customer issues. Employees and customers alike frequently experience frustration as a result of this inefficiency, which causes straightforward problems to become unnecessarily complicated as a result of the multiple layers of bureaucracy.

4. Missed Opportunities for Innovation: Mid-level managers frequently have a better understanding of the challenges that are faced at the ground level than executives do, which places them in an ideal position to suggest improvements and innovations. One of the most common things that happens is that opportunities for innovation and process improvement are missed when managers are only responsible for exchanging information.

Questions Asking for Contemplation

The situation of mid-level managers exchanging information raises a number of important questions, including the following:

To what extent do the existing organisational structures of the company hinder the potential of middle-level managers? It is possible that businesses are unintentionally stifling their employees' growth and the value they can bring to the organisation by restricting the decision-making power that they currently possess.

Does the conventional model of decision-making, which is centralised, have the potential to be sustainable? Because businesses are placing a greater emphasis on the customer experience and adaptability, it may be time to re evaluate whether highly centralised systems are a barrier to responsiveness of the organisation.

When it comes to the culture of the company, what are the implications? Is there a correlation between managers feeling powerless to make decisions and the overall morale of their employees and their level of engagement? It is possible that empowering managers would not only improve the efficiency of the organisation but also the culture of the organisation.

Moving Forward: Delegating Authority to Managers at the Mid-Level

The following are some of the strategies that corporations can implement to empower mid-level managers and foster a culture of responsiveness and proactive problem-solving within their organisations in order to address these challenges:

1. Define Decision-Making Boundaries: Corporations have the ability to identify specific decision-making powers that mid-level managers can exercise independently. These powers may include the authorisation of certain levels of refunds or the resolution of common customer complaints. Having clear boundaries enables managers to take action without the fear of going beyond their authority, which speeds up response times.

2. Invest in Leadership Training: Providing managers with training in areas such as conflict resolution, customer service, and decision-making within compliance guidelines can help them develop their self-assurance and enhance their capacity to effectively manage issues at their level.

3. Encourage a Culture of Accountability and Trust: Moving away from a culture that is risk-averse and towards one that places a high value on accountability and learning from mistakes can give managers the ability to make decisions on their own. When businesses cultivate trust in their mid-level managers, it is likely that they will experience improvements in both their efficiency and the level of employee engagement.

4. The implementation of feedback loops: Providing a platform for mid-level managers to provide feedback on policies and procedures can assist upper management in better understanding the challenges that are being faced on the ground. This practice gives mid-level managers the opportunity to contribute insights that could potentially lead to improvements in the process and assist in the development of guidelines that are more practical.

• Concluding Remarks

Mid-level managers play an essential part in the success of any organisation; however, the prevalent practice of relegating them to the role of merely relaying information undermines the potential of these managers. According to the findings of this case study, treating mid-level managers as information exchanges rather than decision-makers reduces their capacity to lead effectively, undermines the trust of customers, and lowers the morale of employees.

Corporations have the ability to transform mid-level managers from passive intermediaries into proactive leaders by providing them with greater autonomy for decision-making, cultivating an environment that encourages accountability, and establishing clear boundaries for decision-making. As a powerful reminder that the potential of mid-level managers extends beyond simply passing information up and down the chain, the shift has the potential to unlock new efficiencies, foster innovation, and improve overall responsiveness. When operating in a fast-paced and customer-focused business environment, companies need to ask themselves the following question: Are we providing our mid-level managers with the tools they need to make a difference, or are we relegating them to the role of merely acting as providers of information?

© Dr. Pratik P. SURANA

Chief Mentor and Founder,

Quantum Group

#𝗶𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗵𝗶𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵𝘆 #𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱 #𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 #𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗹𝗲 #𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 #𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀