Are we destined to be WAgile?

In more than one recent conversation with large organizations, I’ve heard about the strong push for adoption of “Agile” methodologies in their respective IT organizations. However, there is also an acknowledgement that they are all ending up in their own customized versions of “WAGILE” (Waterfall – Agile). It got me wondering on why and whether we are likely to go past this stage into full blown adoption of Agile approaches.

However, let me dispel a few misnomers that I’ve seen and heard:

  1. Renaming “Requirements” as “User Stories” and putting them into JIRA instead of a Word/Excel document does not make you Agile
  2. Renaming a team as a “Pod” does not make you Agile
  3. Naming two-week sections of your project plan as “Sprints” does not make you Agile

A true adoption Agile requires the changing of mindsets to align with the Agile Manifesto.  In reality however there are several challenges to aligning with this mindset in large organizations. A large part of that challenge comes from the simple reality that “software development” is just one of many things an organization like a Bank, a Telco or a Retailer do. “Software development” is not the reason for their existence and never will be. So, what happens is:

  • For “economies of scale” and “standardization”, processes and tools are mandated
  • For “business continuity”, comprehensive documentation is encouraged (though rarely if ever delivered and maintained)
  • For “procurement compliance & business controls”, contract structure and negotiation play a dominant role
  • For “financial market projections / targets attainment”, plans and dates are set in advance and not movable easily

When you combine this with the fact that a significant portion of the business value is added from software development that happens in the “back-end integration” (i.e., the plumbing) not involving UI/UX with end-customers & users; testing, delivery and deployment cannot easily be incrementally delivered. One can certainly break up the overall scope into phases, but each phase needs to be fully integration tested prior to release. And if there are regulatory or other external constraints…all the intermediate phases, to an executive, are largely irrelevant.

And that is how we end up with W-Agile. Here’s my depiction of how this shows up on the ground. 

No alt text provided for this image

The procurement & contracting element is not intended to suggest that firms contract in a fixed price manner for the entire project. However, it is intended to remind us that software development teams are forced to work within the constraints of what procurement boundaries are drawn for a given initiative.

So, are all “Agile transformation” efforts doomed to end-up as W-Agile? And is that such a bad thing, if they did? Are there things we can do to make this “as Agile as it can be”?

My answers would be “Yes, we will live with a version of W-Agile for a while”. “No, it’s not such a bad thing if we do can do some things to push the Agile mindset”. Here are my suggestions to make the best of being W-Agile.

  1. Don’t fight it, don’t pretend to be “fully Agile”; you will only cause team members, especially the younger ones, to lose trust
  2. Use whatever terminology fits your culture, but make sure there is a common understanding of what it really means
  3. Place a premium on domain/industry experience and familiarity with your working habits, methods and culture while forming your team…mashing together a set of “bodies for hire” likely won’t be agile. Simply hiring “agile certified” folks is likely a costly endeavor for limited value
  4. Acknowledge and invest in practices like DevSecOps and automated testing to accelerate the “middle of the chain”, but recognize that it can have a varying level of impact on end-to-end timelines and estimate & plan accordingly
  5. Recognize that your senior business stakeholders are focused on the end-result (including the time and cost to get there) and you’re focusing on “driving agile adoption” may not be what drives the best outcome for the company overall

Those were some mid-week thoughts from me. 

What are your experiences and opinions?

Sri - well put. When Waterfall methods are well entrenched in an org, the move to any level of Agile operations need to be wel thought through and have to be deliberate. This cannot be a ground up initiative. To start the flywheel going, a very thoughtful approach is needed, the right initiatives to show case the differences/benefits need to be selected. A lot of communications and story telling. And lots of TLC. Results need to be shared but more importantly the journey of what changed and how it changes needs to be made full use of. This HOW we did it is probably one of the most critical elements for proliferating the success. This is a wide / broad topic. Ripe for a few hours of debate and conversation. ;) Looking forward to talking more about this. Srinivas Padmanabharao Joern Kropfgans Jason De Vellis George Krieg Jason Steele

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Srinivas Padmanabharao

  • Happy New Year

    Happy New Year

    Yes, I know that it is only Nov 29th… but then have you forgotten that we will be entering the 3rd year of the AC era…

    3 Comments
  • Do you remember what you saw at SITC?

    Do you remember what you saw at SITC?

    Thanks to Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) for a great #SITC2024 . There were over 1400 posters and equally…

  • Got a booth? get Knolens Edge !!!

    Got a booth? get Knolens Edge !!!

    As an exhibitor attending Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) or sponsoring a booth at #sitc2024 in Houston this…

  • Welcome to SITC 2024, Houston

    Welcome to SITC 2024, Houston

    You have a camera on your mobile phone. Are you ready to use it to drive greater value from your investment of going to…

  • Revolutionizing Systematic Literature Reviews

    Revolutionizing Systematic Literature Reviews

    In the pharmaceutical industry, systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are indispensable for gathering and analyzing…

  • AI : The bottom line challenge

    AI : The bottom line challenge

    It's been nearly two years since ChatGPT burst onto the scene, ushering in a new era of artificial intelligence (AI)…

  • Lets beat infectious diseases !!!

    Lets beat infectious diseases !!!

    Let's wind back the clock. In 1978, CDC set a goal to eliminate measles from the United States by 1982.

    3 Comments
  • Instant Insights at your fingertips

    Instant Insights at your fingertips

    Instant Insights for the biomedical professional : AI at your fingertips Imagine you’re at an important industry…

  • Analytics in the age of LLMs

    Analytics in the age of LLMs

    Once upon a time, most of our communication used to be via spoken voice (the telephone, voicemail or face to face) and…

  • All Cancer is a curse

    All Cancer is a curse

    At the ESMO - European Society for Medical Oncology 2024 conference this weekend, lots of innovative work will be…

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics