What to Do When Your New Job Doesn't Match the Job Description?

What to Do When Your New Job Doesn't Match the Job Description?

Starting a new job is often accompanied by a unique blend of enthusiasm and anticipation. For many professionals, a new role signifies not just a shift in responsibilities but also a progression in their career trajectory, an opportunity to engage with new challenges, and a chance to contribute meaningfully to an organization. The initial phase of onboarding is typically imbued with optimism, as employees familiarize themselves with their workplace culture, colleagues, and the scope of their duties as outlined in the job description. This written portrayal of the role, often meticulously crafted by recruiters, serves as the anchor for both employer and employee expectations. However, when the realities of the role diverge significantly from the description, the initial excitement can quickly give way to confusion and frustration.

Discrepancies between the job description and the actual responsibilities of the role can pose a challenge, particularly during the onboarding phase. These incongruities may stem from several factors, such as rapid organizational changes, poor communication during recruitment, or an outdated understanding of the role's requirements. For the new hire, this misalignment creates a dual burden: the cognitive dissonance of managing unmet expectations and the practical challenge of adapting to unanticipated demands. Research in organizational psychology underscores the criticality of role clarity in employee engagement, with unclear or inconsistent expectations often leading to decreased job satisfaction, lower productivity, and even attrition. Such challenges, if left unaddressed, not only impact individual performance but can also erode trust in the organization.

Addressing these discrepancies early in the onboarding process is imperative for both the employee and the employer. Clear and timely communication can mitigate the adverse effects of mismatched expectations, ensuring that the employee feels supported and valued. For organizations, fostering transparency during this important phase can help maintain a positive employer brand and reduce turnover costs. By confronting the issue head-on, both parties can work collaboratively to realign expectations, create a mutually beneficial understanding of the role, and pave the way for long-term professional satisfaction and success. Thus, the onboarding process, though occasionally fraught with challenges, also provides a vital opportunity to lay the foundation for trust, engagement, and alignment.

Assess the Situation

The initial phase of any onboarding process serves as an important period of acclimatization and learning. For individuals encountering discrepancies between their expectations and the reality of their new role, this period becomes even more pivotal. The first step in addressing such challenges is to adopt a structured approach to observation and learning. Immersing oneself in the day-to-day activities of the role, observing workflows, and understanding the implicit and explicit expectations of the position can provide valuable insights. This observation phase not only aids in deciphering the nuances of the role but also offers an opportunity to identify potential gaps between the actual responsibilities and those outlined during the hiring process. Scholars in organizational behavior highlight the importance of this "reality shock" phase as a determinant of how effectively individuals adapt to new roles and environments.

Once an understanding of the role’s dynamics is established, the next step involves a systematic comparison with the original job description. This requires identifying and documenting specific areas of misalignment. Such discrepancies might include tasks that were emphasized in the hiring process but are absent in practice or new responsibilities that were neither communicated nor anticipated. Scientific literature on role ambiguity underscores the psychological strain caused by unclear expectations, often resulting in reduced performance and morale. A detailed analysis of the divergences not only allows for a clearer understanding of the problem but also equips the individual with concrete examples to bring forward in discussions with management.

Finally, engaging with colleagues to gather context and insights is a vital component of this evaluative process. Conversations with peers, especially those with longer tenure or familiarity with the role’s history, can provide clarity on whether these discrepancies are an isolated occurrence or indicative of broader organizational trends. These interactions may reveal whether the role has evolved in response to changing business needs, whether the organization’s communication structures have inadvertently led to misunderstandings, or whether this is a systemic issue that affects other employees as well. Research on workplace socialization emphasizes the value of informal networks in helping new hires navigate uncertainties and develop a more accurate understanding of their roles.

Approach Your Manager

Engaging with your manager to address discrepancies between the job description and the actual responsibilities of your role is a huge step in ensuring alignment and fostering transparency. This process begins with the deliberate scheduling of a one-on-one meeting to discuss your observations and concerns. Research in organizational communication emphasizes the importance of framing such discussions within a context of collaboration rather than confrontation. By approaching the conversation as an opportunity to align mutual expectations, employees can create an environment conducive to constructive dialogue. The timing and setting of this meeting are equally important; selecting a moment when the manager is likely to be receptive and available can significantly enhance the effectiveness of the interaction. Moreover, articulating a clear agenda beforehand not only demonstrates professionalism but also ensures that the discussion remains focused on resolving the issue at hand.

Rather than expressing dissatisfaction in abstract terms, it is relevant to share specific examples that highlight how the role deviates from the initial job description. This could include tasks or responsibilities that were emphasized during the recruitment process but are absent in practice, as well as unanticipated duties that were never mentioned. Cognitive psychology research on negotiation suggests that evidence-based discussions are more likely to elicit favorable responses, as they anchor the dialogue in objective facts rather than subjective perceptions. For instance, if the role was described as primarily strategic but is predominantly operational in reality, providing examples of daily activities that illustrate this misalignment can strengthen the validity of your concerns. Supporting this with documentation, such as the original job description or recruitment correspondence, can further substantiate your points and demonstrate that your observations are grounded in reality.

The third step involves seeking clarification from the manager regarding the discrepancies. This is not merely about addressing the mismatch but understanding the underlying reasons for it. The evolution of roles within organizations is often influenced by shifting business priorities, resource constraints, or structural changes. By inquiring about these factors, employees can gain valuable insights into the broader context of their role. Research in organizational behavior underscores that role clarity—achieved through open communication—can significantly enhance job satisfaction and reduce turnover intentions. Questions such as, “Have the priorities for this role shifted since the job description was created?” or “Are there upcoming projects that might align more closely with the original expectations?” can elicit informative responses while demonstrating a willingness to adapt to organizational needs.

Approaching a manager with concerns about role misalignment requires a balance of assertiveness and empathy. By scheduling a dedicated meeting, presenting evidence thoughtfully, and seeking clarification with genuine curiosity, employees can transform a potentially challenging situation into an opportunity for mutual understanding and collaboration. This not only fosters greater trust between the employee and the manager but also lays the groundwork for resolving the issue in a manner that benefits both parties.

Define Your Goals

The first priority is to align expectations with your manager, a process that requires a collaborative and transparent approach. Aligning expectations involves establishing a mutual understanding of the role's responsibilities and objectives, both in the context of the organization’s needs and your professional aspirations. According to research in organizational psychology, role ambiguity—when employees are uncertain about their responsibilities—can lead to decreased engagement, increased stress, and even burnout. By working with your manager to adjust the expectations for your role, you can minimize these risks and create a framework for success. This might include redefining specific deliverables, setting measurable goals, or determining which aspects of the original job description remain relevant. Such realignment ensures that both parties have a clear, shared vision of the role, fostering a sense of accountability and purpose.

Modern workplaces often evolve rapidly, and roles may expand beyond their initial scope to meet new challenges. Recognizing this, many organizations are increasingly investing in professional development programs to upskill their employees. Studies in adult learning theory emphasize the importance of continuous learning in maintaining employee adaptability and resilience. Engaging with your manager to identify areas where you need support, whether through formal training programs, online courses, or mentorship from more experienced colleagues, demonstrates a proactive attitude. For example, if your role now involves technical tasks not previously outlined, requesting access to relevant tools or training modules can help you perform effectively while signaling your commitment to growth. Additionally, mentorship can provide not only skill-building but also valuable insights into navigating organizational culture and long-term role expectations.

Understanding how the new role fits into your broader professional aspirations allows you to assess whether it aligns with your long-term objectives. Research in career development highlights the importance of role congruence—how well a role aligns with an individual’s skills, values, and aspirations—in determining job satisfaction and career success. During discussions with your manager, inquire about potential opportunities for advancement or lateral moves that better align with your original expectations. Ask questions such as, “How does this role prepare me for future opportunities within the organization?” or “What metrics will determine success in this position, and how can I leverage them for career growth?” This information not only helps you evaluate the role’s potential but also equips you to make informed decisions about your career trajectory.

By aligning expectations, seeking necessary training, and clarifying your career path, you can transform a potentially frustrating situation into a constructive opportunity for growth. This process not only ensures that your current role is manageable and fulfilling but also provides a foundation for long-term professional success. Moreover, by actively participating in defining your goals, you position yourself as a motivated and adaptable professional, traits that are highly valued in today’s dynamic work environments.

Decide on Next Steps

Once a comprehensive understanding of the discrepancies between the job description and actual responsibilities has been established, the next step involves making informed decisions about how to move forward. One option is to adapt to the role, particularly if the discrepancies are manageable and the responsibilities align with your skill set and career aspirations. Adapting to the role requires a mindset of flexibility and resilience, both of which are considered attributes in today’s dynamic work environments. Research in organizational behavior suggests that employees who embrace change and seek to optimize their performance in new or unexpected circumstances tend to experience greater professional growth and satisfaction. Thriving in a modified role may involve setting personal development goals, seeking feedback regularly, and leveraging the resources available within the organization to excel in the responsibilities at hand. By reframing the situation as an opportunity to learn and grow, you can mitigate the initial disappointment of unmet expectations and build new competencies that may prove valuable in future roles.

If, however, the discrepancies involve critical tasks or responsibilities that are integral to your career objectives, negotiating changes to incorporate these elements becomes a necessary course of action. Effective negotiation involves presenting your case to your manager with clarity and professionalism, supported by evidence from the job description and a rationale for why these tasks are relevant. Research on workplace negotiation highlights the importance of framing requests in terms of mutual benefits, emphasizing how incorporating these tasks could align with organizational goals or improve overall team performance. For instance, if a strategic planning component promised in the job description is absent but remains a priority for your career development, propose specific ways to introduce these responsibilities, such as leading a new project or contributing to long-term planning initiatives. Such discussions require a collaborative approach, demonstrating both your willingness to meet the organization’s needs and your commitment to professional growth.

In cases where the role is fundamentally misaligned with your skills, values, or career aspirations, and where adjustments are not feasible, it may be necessary to consider moving on. This decision should be approached with careful deliberation, taking into account both the short-term consequences and long-term implications for your career. Research in career transition psychology emphasizes the importance of timing and planning when making such moves, as abrupt decisions can lead to unnecessary stress or financial instability. Begin by exploring alternative opportunities within the organization, such as lateral transfers to roles better aligned with your expertise. If internal opportunities are unavailable, assess the external job market and consider how your current experience, even if misaligned, can be reframed to highlight transferable skills. Informing your manager about your decision in a respectful and constructive manner helps preserve professional relationships and ensures that you leave the organization on good terms, which could be beneficial for future networking.

Preventing Future Mismatches

The most important step is asking detailed and specific questions during interviews to gain a comprehensive understanding of the role's day-to-day responsibilities. While interviews often focus on the broader scope of the position, candidates should steer the conversation toward practical details. Inquire about the typical tasks that occupy the majority of a workday, key challenges associated with the role, and how success is measured. Behavioral interviews, which are now widely used, provide an excellent opportunity to ask follow-up questions based on scenarios shared by the interviewer. For example, if a hiring manager describes a recent project undertaken by the team, a candidate might ask how their role would have contributed to that project. According to research in human resource management, clear and direct communication during the recruitment phase significantly reduces the likelihood of role ambiguity, leading to higher employee satisfaction and retention.

Equally important is conducting thorough research on the organization to gain a deeper understanding of its culture, values, and operational dynamics. Online platforms such as Glassdoor, LinkedIn, or other employer review sites can provide valuable insights into how the organization operates and how roles are perceived by current or former employees. Testimonials often highlight discrepancies between advertised roles and actual responsibilities, providing a more realistic picture of what to expect. Academic studies on employer branding underscore the importance of aligning personal values with organizational culture, as a misalignment can lead to dissatisfaction and disengagement. Beyond online research, candidates can also reach out to current employees through professional networks to ask about their experiences. Engaging with individuals who hold similar roles or have worked with the hiring team can yield nuanced perspectives that are often absent from official job descriptions or interviews.

Another key strategy for preventing mismatches is to clarify expectations in writing before accepting the offer. Once a verbal offer has been extended, candidates should request a formalized job description that details the responsibilities, reporting structure, and performance expectations for the role. This document should serve as a reference point for both the employer and the employee, ensuring that there is a shared understanding of the position. Legal and organizational studies emphasize the role of written agreements in reducing ambiguity and fostering accountability. If any tasks or expectations discussed during interviews are not included in the job description, candidates should address these discrepancies with the hiring manager. This proactive step demonstrates professionalism and ensures alignment between the candidate’s aspirations and the organization’s needs. Furthermore, documenting these discussions in email correspondence can serve as a safeguard, providing clarity and evidence should discrepancies arise later.

Conclusion

The onboarding process is a juncture in any professional’s journey within a new organization. It sets the tone for the relationship between the employee and the employer, establishing expectations and fostering initial impressions. Open communication during this phase is not merely a best practice but an important component of successful integration into the workplace. Transparent dialogue allows employees to voice concerns, seek clarifications, and collaboratively address any discrepancies between the anticipated and actual responsibilities of their role. Organizational studies consistently highlight the significance of psychological safety—an environment where employees feel empowered to express their thoughts without fear of repercussions—as a driver of job satisfaction and productivity. By fostering such communication, both parties can work toward aligning expectations and addressing concerns before they escalate into broader dissatisfaction.

Misalignments between the job description and the actual work, while undoubtedly challenging, need not be insurmountable. Proactive steps, such as observing the role's requirements, engaging in constructive conversations with managers, and negotiating necessary changes, can transform what initially appears to be a roadblock into an opportunity for growth. Research in adaptive leadership suggests that individuals who approach professional challenges with a solutions-oriented mindset are more likely to thrive in dynamic environments. These situations often require a delicate balance of assertiveness and adaptability, enabling employees to advocate for their needs while remaining responsive to organizational realities. By taking ownership of the alignment process, employees can turn moments of uncertainty into valuable learning experiences that strengthen their problem-solving abilities and resilience.

Even when such efforts do not yield the desired outcome, these experiences offer valuable insights into personal and professional priorities. Every misaligned role teaches lessons about what one values in a workplace, what skills one wishes to develop, and what environments are most conducive to one’s growth. Such knowledge is instrumental in charting a clearer, more purposeful career path. As career development theories emphasize, navigating setbacks and recalibrating goals is not a sign of failure but a testament to an individual’s capacity for growth and self-awareness. By embracing the lessons learned from these experiences, professionals can refine their understanding of what they seek in a role, leading them toward opportunities that are better aligned with their aspirations.

In conclusion, while discovering misalignments during onboarding can initially feel like a setback, it is ultimately an opportunity for growth, reflection, and alignment. Open communication, proactive problem-solving, and a commitment to learning can transform these challenges into stepping stones toward professional fulfillment. By approaching such situations with a positive and adaptive mindset, individuals can not only navigate the immediate difficulties but also move closer to defining and achieving their ideal career path.

Literature:

  • Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2011). Organizational socialization: The effective onboarding of new employees. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 51-64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Klein, H. J., & Polin, B. (2012). Are organizations on board with best practices onboarding? In C. R. Wanberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization (pp. 267-287). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Saks, A. M., & Gruman, J. A. (2011). Getting newcomers engaged: The role of socialization tactics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(5), 383-402.
  • Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Wanberg, C. R., Rubenstein, A. L., & Song, Z. (2013). Support, undermining, and newcomer socialization: Fitting in during the first 90 days. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1104-1124.
  • Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Anderson, N. (2006). Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), 492-516.
  • Ellis, A. M., Bauer, T. N., Mansfield, L. R., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D. M., & Simon, L. S. (2015). Navigating uncharted waters: Newcomer socialization through the lens of stress theory. Journal of Management, 41(1), 203-235.
  • Ashforth, B. E., Sluss, D. M., & Saks, A. M. (2007). Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(3), 447-462.
  • Wanous, J. P., & Reichers, A. E. (2000). New employee orientation programs. Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), 435-451.
  • Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226-251.
  • Feldman, D. C. (1981). The multiple socialization of organization members. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 309-318.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics