When To Fire Someone Instead of Flogging the Dead Horse
"The tribal wisdom of the Dakota Indians, passed on from generation to generation, says that; When you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount. HOWEVER, In modern business education and practices
The phrase "flogging a dead horse" means to persist in pursuing a goal or outcome that is already unattainable or has already been accomplished. It refers to the uselessness of beating or whipping a horse that is already dead, as it will not respond or be motivated to move. The expression is often used to describe situations where someone wastes time and effort on a task that is unlikely to yield any benefit or result.
This is when you need to fire or relocate somebody. But how do we know if the person is a dead horse?
Based on my experience, the best way to make that decision is to train & show the person that the job can be done in a certain way or within a specific period of time. It is a reasonably good reason to end employment
Once, an L&D colleague and I were called to help a restaurant manager who couldn't manage the operation. Staff had no breaks, no training, the schedule changed daily, no day-offs, holiday or public holidays cleared etc.
My colleague had an F&B background, so we concluded that the best way to train him was to show him how it is done. She ran the restaurant for two weeks, and he was only allowed to shadow her. She coached him in operation, and I coached him outside of it. We put policies and practices
After two weeks, we handed back the operation to the restaurant manager and coached daily through small chats. Within three weeks, the restaurant was back to square one, and we trainers were blamed, of course. The restaurant manager came up with all sorts of excuses why he couldn't do it. Was he fired? No!
Recommended by LinkedIn
Why? "He is good with guests".
Us: "Great, then make him a guest relation agent or a waiter but not a manager responsible for 50 staff on his team."
This is when you fire or reallocate a person. The job can be done easily, but the person is incompetent at doing it. If one needs to be trained to that degree for a job (s)he occupies, that person is clearly in the wrong role.
People quickly end up in jobs they are not competent to do, which is ok. It happens. But we cannot waste money training the wrong people for any role they will never be good at.
Look for people who are naturally suitable for the role
I said it many times: I wouldn't invest a penny in his/her development that is just a waste of resources.
PS: Many of the soft skills are not trainable
Philosopher/ Accept the relational nature of Everything and you will see systemic patterns more clealy
1yI see our current economic system as almost a dead horse that has been flogged and flogged and still some think that this or that will bring it to life. I also think there is some idea for system change in that wisdom. That tweeking a bad system may not bring it to life.
I organize language courses for companies, overseeing their content and effectiveness. I am an expert in language teaching and customer service, and the owner of the language school Academy of Language sp. z o.o.
1yI agree 100%! So the key in etg is really in recruitment - u hire a suitable person and u know u both can just focus on developing their talent. Love it!
senior advocate supreme court of Pakistan
1yWhat a technical way to transfer most beneficial idea to general public ....God bless you