When to use an external search firm, and should you choose contingent, retained, or contained recruiting?
We’ve all been there. You posted a job that urgently needs to be filled, but responses haven't been good. The hiring manager is frustrated, and you still don’t have a solid candidate in the pipeline.
When is it time to call an external search firm, and should you choose contingent, retained, or contained recruiting?
Read on to learn how to choose the right option, how much you can expect to pay, and other tips for a win-win partnership and great candidate experience.
Types of External Recruiting Firms
External recruiting agencies operate under three main types:
They are differentiated by how they are paid and the services they provide. All three models may be exclusive or non-exclusive. Exclusive means that the agency is the only agency you are working with and you commit to not source with others, including your own internal team. Non-exclusive means you could have multiple agencies, or your own team, working the same search.
Retained Recruiting
In retained recruiting, the recruiter charges a fee to your company and is paid whether or not your hired candidate comes from them. A retained recruiter is usually paid upfront or in installments—often 1/3 at the beginning of the search, 1/3 when candidates are presented, and 1/3 when the candidate accepts the position. In return for exclusivity and guaranteed payment, they commit to providing high-value service to you and the candidates. They proactively find candidates, get them interested in the role, vet them for cultural and technical fit, present a shortlist of qualified candidates, and then you pick the one you like the most.
Pros of retained recruiting
Cons of retained recruiting
Contingency Recruiting
In contingency recruiting, the recruiter only gets paid if your company hires a candidate they brought you. Costs are slightly lower to those of retained search, but payment is “contingent” upon the candidate being selected. It is common for contingent recruiters to spend more time sourcing candidates from their database and then sending you the resumes, and less time contacting passive candidates or doing an exhaustive interview and assessment process. There is less customer service and more work for you to do in this model.
Pros of contingency recruiting
Cons of contingency recruiting
Contained Recruiting
Contained recruiting is a combination of retained and contingent. The agency uses a pay-for-performance model where you only pay as they deliver on the engagement. These agencies require exclusivity. You pay a portion (usually 1/3) of the projected first-year total cash compensation at the start of the engagement, and then the rest is paid at certain milestones, like when a batch of viable candidates is presented or once a candidate is hired.
Pros of contained recruiting
Cons of contained recruiting
When to choose contingency, retained or contained
Use contingency agencies:
Use retained agencies:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Use contained agencies:
When Do You Need External Help?
In evaluating your need for external recruiting, consider the type of position and the capacity of our internal team.
Types of Positions Best Filled by Your HR Team
Your internal HR or talent acquisition team can likely fill a wide variety of positions through posting positions through your website or on LinkedIn, Indeed, or other job boards. These include:
Is Your Internal Team at Capacity?
You should also determine whether your internal recruiting team has the capacity and capability to proactively find and contact passive candidates. Passive candidates are those who are not actively looking and therefore are not applying to your job postings.
At most companies, internal talent acquisition teams are not so much proactive recruiters as they are requisition managers. Their job is to filter applications, which means they will only present active job seekers who have applied. A typical internal recruiter can handle between 20-25 job postings before reaching diminishing returns. That number decreases significantly if you want them to proactively search for and contact candidates who aren’t looking or applying on their own.
Common Scenarios in which to Consider Outside Help
The Cost of External Recruiting
As much as you may want to avoid paying the fees of a recruiting agency, consider the full opportunity cost of not engaging one soon enough. What’s the cost of another several weeks, months, or quarters of not having someone in that role? What’s the impact on morale and the potential burnout of the others who have to pick up that work?
Costs are anywhere from 20-40%+ of the projected first-year total cash compensation of the successful candidate (most retained search companies are 30-33%). Contingency firms are on the lower end of that scale. Retained and contained recruiters are more in the middle to upper range and generally require a minimum amount in revenue to take on the search, i.e., $25,000. Many firms are negotiable, especially if they are trying to get their foot in the door with you.
Finally, costs depend on the type of role and difficulty level as well as the type of agency you decide to work with (retained, contingent, or contained).
What to Look for When Selecting an Agency
Factors to consider and questions to ask when choosing an agency to work with include:
Tips for a win-win partnership and great candidate experience
About the Author:
Joe Nabrotzky is the Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Global Leader Group and a former HR Business Partner and Talent Acquisition Executive at a Fortune 100 company. He's found successful and diverse leaders in most every type of role and industry - from Sr. Manager to the C-suite, with strong expertise in functional leadership positions (HR, Finance, IT, Legal, Sales, Marketing), and General Management. Contact Joe to work your hard to fill or confidential roles that require proactively contacting talent who aren't currently looking.
☑️ 𝗜 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗲𝗯𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 ☑️ Wordpress website design for small business. ☑️ Responsive web design ☑️ Website audits
11moJoe, thanks for sharing!
Fantastic insight Joe Nabrotzky, MBA, SHRM-SCP on how companies can and should look at Search. My experience is that firms should strongly look at a search partner to those roles that are most critical and also for vacancies that stay vacant too long. I know as leaders in organizations we are always looking at our costs and sometimes it is hard to swallow a search partner expense, but the cost to wait too long or lose more of your execution I have found to be more costly. The lost productivity we need to consider much more when we do our internal cost analysis and where to invest. Keep the conversation going Joe.
Creative Solutions Lead @ SequelMV | New Media, Video Production, Virtual Reality
2ySuch a crazy time… at least in Nashville some job markets are just tapped for talent and it’s hard to find good candidates that are looking for work. In th e past you might have had dozens of candidates now there’s only a handful of applications at all…
Interactional Leadership & Resilience Expert * Motivational Speaker * Brain Tumor Survivor * Author of 4 Books * Champion Storyteller * Certified Business Coach & Consultant * Exactly What to Say Certified Guide *
2yThis is great information, especially for organizations looking to up their game and recruit the RIGHT people for their open positions. The post and pray approach will definitely not work in this market. Thanks for the thorough article.
Fantastic overview Joe--many hiring leaders would find this helpful in selecting the best route forward before approaching the recruiting market.