Where Are The Innovators?
I found some... but are they in the right areas?
This issue feels pretty personal. Ten years ago I had an ambitious idea called The Physio Matters Podcast but it was doomed to failure if I couldn’t persuade guests to come on a completely unproven show. A family friend of my housemate (she prefers wife) had an in with an esteemed Physio called Ian Horsley who was willing to give me a chance. His Feb 2014 episode was a hit and on we rolled! Once again he gives another of my ambitious ideas a chance in this month’s mag with an excellent article joining the dots between general MSK and elite sport; two areas that he has decades of experience in.
Two years later I interviewed another generous expert about her clinical work demonstrating that functional rehab principles improve return to work outcomes. It led to her become a dear friend and mentor of mine who has written a brilliant article in this issue. She’s not especially optimistic about the fate of functional rehab but she would be wrong if more were to follow her lead. If you’re not aware of Heather McLellan✨ (formerly Watson) then you’re in for a treat.
Less of a treat for me was reading another of this month’s pieces; ‘The Rise and Fall of MSKReform’. Whilst my old mate Felicity Thow has done a great job telling the story, it is painful for me to read about the failure of what turned out to be one of my over-ambitious ideas.
Part of the MSKReform project was creating a path to uniting the MSK professions by centring clinical reasoning, evidence based practice and distributed responsibility. Around the time of its foundation, I met a man called Robert Beaven who exemplified these values. I liked how he thought and I he had the sense to create a podcast for the lay public on back pain. But he was ‘the wrong sort’… he was a Chiro. His article confessing to how odd he is makes for a great prelude to another by a more recent accomplice of mine Leanne Antoine .
Leanne is a brilliant entrepreneur and even better communicator. She spells out how challenging it is ‘when your business needs needs more than just you’. It really is a great example of high stakes delegation that I perhaps need to take heed of as MSKMag grows thanks to your reading and sharing!
So once again I get to introduce a set of free thinkers with a diverse range of views and experiences whose innovation has moved the MSK needle in sport (Ian), functional rehab (Heather), public education (Rob) and small business (Leanne). But the story that includes some failure (Felicity’s) is in a realm where innovation remains sparse and MSKReform’s ill-fated story is unlikely to encourage many into the policy influence game. It’s a worrying shame because this is one of two areas where literally anything new or interesting would be welcome.
If innovators don’t emerge to influence policy and operational behaviours (as MSKReform sought to do) then the progress made by the various education and clinical influencers risk being largely irrelevant. The structure of our services and the parameters in which they are operated greatly influence the delivery of MSK care as pretty much every article in this month’s mag explains. I lasted a whole page without a metaphor so here’s one because I couldn’t help myself:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Lets consider the following factors to be ingredients of a delicious cake mixture:
But let’s also consider that the operational behaviour and policy parameters of MSK services are the cake tins. So if services have:
… even glorious, award-winning cake mixtures will fall through the oven shelves if we don’t build tins.
And don’t get me started on whether anyone is willing to fund turning the oven on.
Leading the change in conservative spine care with IDD Therapy Spinal Decompression. Passionate about non-surgical solutions for herniated discs and clinic development. Download a free clinic expansion prospectus.
10moReally resonates. I am aware of the challenge of bringing about change, what people expect, the impact of scepticism, evidence-based practice vs evidence-based medicine etc. I did not create the innovation I am involved in but I have sold my soul and most of my assets to its roll out. I know others in different areas and you get battered and bloodied along the way. Deters many from putting their heads above the parapet. Great work with all of this. I don't know if others would feel the same, but I for one would be interested in a physical magazine. I can only really "deep read" a physical book or printed article and these articles are worthy of deep reading / deep focus. If there is a physical mag, apologies for missing it. Please point me to where I can subscribe. I don't know the costs but appreciate that physical magazines and mail are costly for the business model, but I ask in case there is one or it creates a new idea :-) Best wishes, Steve (If there isn't a physical mag, Idea 1 - print a quarterly physical magazine with the articles which get the most traction online. Idea 2 - ask me and others if I/they want to advertise in it, I will. Idea 3 - have a section for whacky innovative ideas :-)
Founder & Director of Physio Matters, Therapy Live & Chews Health | Editor-in-Chief of MSKMag |
10moRave reviews on WhatsApp
Live & work free from the limitations of illness & injury - Return to Work support for owners & leaders | Mentor | Physiotherapist | Trauma Informed Coach | Speaker 🔉 | Day One Trauma Trustee | Lived experience ABI & Ca
10moDelighted to be part of this month's MSKMag, I continue to be bewildered as to why good old fashioned rehabilitation should even need to be thought of as innovation.......maybe that's what has to happen to stop it becoming extinct 🤔
Clinic Director, Podcast Host, Educator and Chiropractor
10moLove this Jack.
Strategist | Advisor | Investor
10moYour last point is the most important Jack Chew - funding. Invention/idea + commercialisation = innovation, otherwise it remains a good idea. The focus has to be on the commercial value or impact on productivity/efficiency to join the dots. Otherwise the practitioners stakeholder voice is too small and it becomes a nice to have rather than an innovation with competitive advantage that sees wide adoption.