Why the Average Family Car in the U.S. Will Soon Be Electric - with or without subsidies

Why the Average Family Car in the U.S. Will Soon Be Electric - with or without subsidies

EV Battery prices are falling rapidly, as much as 80% in the coming years. Cost per mile could reach as low as 0.02$ per mile. The right time is from now on to shift to EV's.

The automotive world is shifting rapidly, and one number makes the case crystal clear: the cost per kilometer. For years, debates about electric, hydrogen, and traditional gasoline-powered cars have focused on technology, environmental benefits, and infrastructure.

But for most families, the decision ultimately comes down to dollars and cents. And when you look at cost per kilometer today—and projections for 2030—the numbers tell a story that no one can ignore.

The True Costs of Driving

Let’s break it down:

Gasoline-powered cars (ICE vehicles):

At about $0.14 per kilometer, the average American family driving 15,000 miles (24,140 km) per year spends roughly $3,380 annually on fuel. But that’s only part of the story.

ICE vehicles are heavily subsidized in the U.S., with direct subsidies for fossil fuels totaling $20 billion annually, and indirect costs—such as health impacts from air pollution, environmental damage, and military expenditures to secure oil supplies—adding tens of billions more.

These hidden costs, borne by taxpayers, inflate the true price of gasoline and drag on the economy.

Battery electric vehicles (BEVs)

With today’s average electricity costs, BEVs operate at around $0.03 per kilometer. For the same 15,000 miles, that’s just $724 per year—a savings of over $2,600 compared to ICE vehicles.

By 2030, as battery costs drop to $50 per kWh, this figure could shrink to $0.02 per kilometer, saving families nearly $2,900 annually.

And unlike ICE vehicles, BEVs reduce societal costs by cutting emissions and improving public health.

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (FCEVs)

At approximately $0.34 per kilometer today, hydrogen-powered cars cost $8,208 annually to fuel—far more than either BEVs or ICEs.

Even if hydrogen costs fall by 2030, FCEVs are unlikely to match the affordability or practicality of BEVs anytime soon.

This is more than a comparison of technologies; it’s a wake-up call for families and policymakers. The numbers show that BEVs are not just the future—they’re the present.

Subsidized ICE Vehicles Cost Us All

The average American family pays not only at the pump but also through their taxes and health.

Fossil fuel subsidies artificially lower the price of gasoline, masking its true cost. When you factor in subsidies, environmental degradation, and healthcare costs from pollution, the real cost of driving an ICE vehicle far exceeds what families see on their receipts.

A recent study estimated that the hidden costs of fossil fuels amount to $600 billion annually in the U.S., or about $2,000 per person. Transitioning to BEVs can save families money while reducing these societal burdens.

What This Means for American Families

For the average family, these cost differences are transformative. Switching from an ICE vehicle to a BEV today saves more than $2,600 annually on fuel alone.

Over ten years, that’s nearly $30,000—enough to pay for a child’s college tuition, a down payment on a home, or years of family vacations. And that doesn’t include the additional savings BEVs offer through lower maintenance costs, as they have fewer moving parts and don’t require oil changes.

Families that install solar panels at home could see even greater savings, generating their own electricity and essentially driving for free.

This is where BEVs truly shine: not only are they cheaper to operate, but they also give families the ability to control their energy costs in a way ICE and hydrogen cars never could.

ICE Vehicles: A Costly Roadblock

Gasoline-powered cars have hit their technological ceiling. Their operating costs depend entirely on the price of oil, which is subject to global market volatility and political instability.

As governments worldwide phase out ICE vehicles and impose carbon taxes, owning one will only become more expensive. These trends pose particular challenges for lower-income families, who may struggle to afford the transition to BEVs without targeted support.

Hydrogen: A Solution Searching for a Market

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, while promising for certain applications like heavy-duty transport, remain an expensive and impractical option for most families.

With fuel costs more than ten times higher than BEVs per kilometer, FCEVs are unlikely to gain traction in the personal car market anytime soon. Limited refueling infrastructure and high production costs further complicate their adoption.

Looking Toward 2030

By 2030, the financial case for BEVs will be undeniable. Battery costs are expected to fall dramatically, reducing vehicle prices and operational expenses.

Charging infrastructure is expanding rapidly, and the shift to renewable energy will make BEVs even more attractive. Meanwhile, ICE vehicles will remain tied to fluctuating oil prices and escalating regulatory costs, and hydrogen vehicles will continue to face scalability challenges.

For the average family, the choice is becoming clearer: BEVs are the most affordable, practical, and future-proof option.

Saving Oil and Gas for a Rainy Day

Transitioning cars to electricity isn’t just about saving money and cutting emissions—it’s about preserving critical resources.

Gasoline and oil are finite, and many industries, such as aviation, heavy manufacturing, and certain chemical processes, can’t yet fully transition to electricity.

By reducing reliance on fossil fuels for personal transportation, we conserve these resources for sectors where alternatives aren’t viable.

Keeping more oil and gas in the ground is a strategic move, ensuring these limited resources are available for the industries that truly need them while reducing the environmental and economic toll of overextraction.

For families, it’s a win-win: switching to EVs saves thousands annually and contributes to a smarter, more sustainable energy future.

A Call to Action

As families, policymakers, and industry leaders, we must embrace this transition. Governments should redirect subsidies from fossil fuels to incentivize BEV adoption and expand renewable energy access.

Automakers must continue innovating to bring BEVs to market at lower prices. And for families, the time to consider an electric vehicle isn’t five years from now—it’s today.

The financial, environmental, and societal benefits of BEVs are no longer hypothetical—they’re here. It’s time to rethink what “affordable” really means in the world of cars. When you factor in the hidden costs of ICE vehicles, the answer becomes even clearer: the future is electric.

This isn’t just about saving money; it’s about making smarter choices for our families, our wallets, and our planet. Are you ready to make the switch?

#great2green #ElectricVehicles #EVs #Germany #Sustainability #FutureIsElectric #GreenEnergy #CleanTransportation #ClimateAction #RenewableEnergy #CarbonNeutral #SaveMoney #EVSavings #TechInnovation #ZeroEmissions #EcoFriendly #ElectricCar #SmartChoices #GreenLeadership #BEV #HydrogenVsElectric

Steve Cole

Marine, coastal and defence environmental management

2w

Great post, thanks! My solar pv array exports enough electricity to charge an EV fully most days for 6 months of the year. Problem for me is I moved nearer family, now mostly work from home, and catch a ferry to the office when I need to, and i bought an electric motorbike. Dropped my car kms travelled from 20,000 to 4,000. Still struggling to prioritise an EV when I still have so much to do in terms of home energy efficiency!! Hopefully evs continue to get cheaper in the meantime!

Skip Bowman

Author of Green2Great and Safe2Great | Keynote Speaker | Creator of the Relational #GrowthMindset | Championing Leadership for a Sustainable, Equal, and Critical-Thinking World

2w

To put it bluntly, petrol and diesel are 5 times more expensive than electric powered vehicles per mile, and their TCO is falling fast while ICE have no substantial cost reductions in the future and possibly face a reduction in fuel subsidies especially in countries that import lots of oil. Hydrogen is 10 times more expensive per mile with no major reduction in prices in the foreseeable future because supplies will be directed towards heavy transport and industrial needs. Check mate! Electric bikes btw are the cheapest at 1 cent per 2 miles!

Ishu Bansal

Optimizing logistics and transportation with a passion for excellence | Building Ecosystem for Logistics Industry | Analytics-driven Logistics

2w

Switching to EVs not only saves money, but also benefits the environment and reduces our reliance on foreign oil. Investing in solar panels and batteries is a smart move for long-term savings.

Myles Robinson

SEO and Lead Generation Expert

2w

Combining solar with EVs is such a smart move for long-term savings. Have you calculated your potential ROI? 🌞 #SmartInvestment

Prashanth S Kumar

Bangalore Real Estate & Investment Consultant | Helping Executives & Investors Secure Dream Properties & Smart Deals | Trusted Advisor for Comprehensive Property Solutions

2w

Skip Bowman, switching gears to evs seems like a solid move. the savings add up real quick. you mentioned solar panels—how do you think they’d alter monthly expenses?

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics