Why Millenials Are Screwed
The Fulcrum Supporting the US Economy
Over the past few years, as the Millennial generation has grown into its own, in 2016 surpassing Baby Boomers as the nation's largest living generation according to the Census (Americans aged 18-34 in 2015 now number 75.4 million, surpassing the 74.9 million Baby Boomers aged 51-69), in the process becoming the fulcrum support of the US economy, it has also prompted many questions:
- Why aren't Millennials investing in the stock market?
- Why aren't they starting families?
- Why aren't Millenials buying houses?
- Why are they living in their parents' basements well into their thirties?
In short, we are collectively asking "Why don't they just spend?"
The latest answer to all these questions came yesterday following a new analysis of Fed data by the Young Invincibles group, according to which with a median household income of $40,581, despite being better educated, millennials now earn 20% less than boomers did at the same stage of life in 1989, who earned $50,910 some 25 years ago.
Looking over this analysis shows other disturbing trends, which confirm that America's troubling generational divide is all too real and helps explain much of the anxiety that defined the 2016 election. Some examples: millennials have half the net worth of boomers; their home ownership rate is lower, while their student debt is drastically higher.
The generational gap is a central dilemma for the incoming presidency of Donald Trump, who pledged a return to the prosperity of post-World War II America. The analysis also hints at the issues of culture and identity that divided many voters, showing that white millennials — who still earn much more than their blacks and Latino peers — have seen their incomes plummet the most relative to boomers.
The Fed data shows the extent of the decline. It compared 25 to 34 year-olds in 2013, the most recent year available, to the same age group in 1989 after adjusting for inflation. Education does help boost incomes. But the median college-educated millennial with student debt is only earning slightly more than a baby boomer without a degree did in 1989.
The home ownership rate for this age group dipped to 43 percent from 46 percent in 1989, although the rate has improved for millennials with a college degree relative to boomers. The median net worth of millennials is $10,090, 56 percent less than it was for boomers.
While whites still earn dramatically more than Blacks and Latinos, reflecting the legacy of discrimination for jobs, education and housing. Yet compared to white baby boomers, some white millennials appear stuck in a pattern of downward mobility. This group has seen their median income tumble more than 21% to $47,688. Median income for black millennials has fallen just 1.4 percent to $27,892. Latino millennials earn nearly 29 percent more than their boomer predecessors to $30,436.
The analysis fits into a broader pattern of diminished opportunity. Research last year by economists led by Stanford University's Raj Chetty found that people born in 1950 had a 79 percent chance of making more money than their parents. That figure steadily slipped over the past several decades, such that those born in 1980 had just a 50 percent chance of out-earning their parents.
This decline has occurred even though younger Americans are increasingly college-educated. The proportion of 25 to 29 year-olds with a college degree has risen to 35.6 percent in 2015 from 23.2 percent in 1990, a report this month by the Brookings Institution noted.
The declining fortunes of millennials could impact boomers who are retired or on the cusp of retirement. Payroll taxes from millennials helps to finance the Social Security and Medicare benefits that many boomers receive, programs that Trump has said won't be subject to spending cuts. And those same boomers will need younger generations to buy their homes and invest in the financial markets to protect their own savings.
For now, despite Obama's recurring narrative of an economic "recovery" which unfortunately skipped some 75.4 million Americans, and despite Trump's promises that he will somehow make it batter, it remains unclear just how this most important US generation will emerge from its demographic and economic doldrums.
How do you think the Millenial Generation will emerge from the current economic climate?
As a member of Relus' recruiting team, Brian Fink focuses on driving talent towards opportunity. Eager to help stretch the professional capabilities of everyone he works with, he's helping startups grow and successfully scale their IT, Recruiting, Big Data, Product, and Executive Leadership teams. An active keynote speaker and commentator, Fink thrives on discovery and building a better-recruiting mousetrap. Follow him on Twitter.
Business Process Analyst at CooperVision
7yi think the answer to why they are screwed is pretty clear in the article! "millennials have half the net worth of boomers; their home ownership rate is lower, while their student debt is drastically higher." Spiraling education costs coupled with wage stagnation = not enough money to invest in a home.
VP Sales, Marketing & Administration at FX Design Group
7yNot all....there are many millennials out there with a great work ethic and entrepreneurial spirit.......you just have to find them and recruit them.
WS Display - Vice President of Sales and Co-Host of The Trade Shows Unhinged Podcast on Facebook's Group = "You Know You Work in Trade Shows When..." and The Don and Mike Show Reunion Podcast
7ythe answer? they won't settle for less because they feel entitled to more!
Direct Selling Expert
7yI was hoping you'd provide the answer to your title, "Why Millenials Are Screwed", in your article. Lots of data, but no results of its analysis. Is there an answer?
Director
7yHaving the freedom to try new things and live life on your terms requires financing. Demanding that parents or the government provide this funding without a solid business plan is irresponsible and that is what I am seeing with many millennials. The entrepreneurial spirit is fantastic and I applaud those with the courage to adopt it. Basing a business model on demands that others support it because of some perceived entitlement or victimhood status is flawed and should not be encouraged. As for laying these future failings at the feet of the incoming President rather than on the doorstep of the originator of the ill conceived and poorly executed model, this solves nothing and actually feeds the mythos upon which the originator operates.