Why we’re seeing more bounceback CEOs

Why we’re seeing more bounceback CEOs

If you went off the grid in 2010 and re-emerged to survey the cast of characters in today’s business pages, you might be forgiven for thinking that things hadn’t changed.

Bob Iger is still the CEO of Disney. Julian Dunkerton runs Superdry, and Richard Bradbury is in charge of River Island. There’s Nittin Passi at Missguided and, if you’d looked in late 2022, even Howard Schultz at Starbucks.

Each left their firm for a time, voluntarily or otherwise, only to return later, brought back by boards or investors hoping they could restore some lost magic.

Founders and former CEOs aren’t the only ones we’re seeing return to their old stomping grounds. More and more, we’re noticing company veterans come back in more senior roles, after years elsewhere.

Matalan CEO Jo Whitfield comes to mind (she worked there from 2002-8) as does Peter Ruis, who returned to run John Lewis department stores this year after leaving as brand director in 2013.

Statistically, it makes sense that we’d see more bounceback leaders as job tenures contract — there’s just a higher chance that an opportunity would bring you back through those same doors.

But it also makes sense for the business itself. Former executives already know the business — its strengths and weaknesses, how it works, where the bodies are buried — making organ rejection less likely.

And there is no one safer to choose to run a business than someone who ran it successfully before — hence the return of the aforementioned founders.

At the same time, time apart means a returning CEO candidate can often bring fresh ideas and experiences to the table that most internal hires cannot.

This is perhaps less likely with someone like Iger, who was retired, than someone like Whitfield whose career took her to other places like Asda and Co-Op. But even then the distance can help people to see the business differently.

The downside

It can look like the best of both worlds, but there are risks to hiring a bounceback CEO. Former leaders in particular may not appreciate how the business has changed.

The wrong bounceback hire may simply look to apply old solutions to new problems, rejecting beneficial innovations that postdate their departure. This in turn can create challenges with people who’ve joined the business in the interim, in stark contrast to the dream team that the high-achieving CEOs likely relied on in their glory days.

I can’t help but think of Bjorn Borg’s ill-fated comeback to tennis in the early 1990s, complete with now-naff bandana and wooden racquet: the game had moved on, and he lost every match.

The board’s duty

There are two lessons. The first is for management: treat people well on the way out, at every level, because one day the company may want to hire them again.

The second is for the board, which plays a crucial role here. Particularly when the business is struggling, the board may want someone who can restore the company’s confidence, by recalling the vision that made it shine in the first place.

But they also need to know that the returning executive shares their essential understanding of the business and its situation today, and is going to apply fresh ideas too.

Either that, or they hire the old CEO back in an interim capacity, while they figure out carefully who they need to take the company in a new direction, as Starbucks did with Schultz.

In other words, when the board hires a bounceback CEO, it can’t just be because they can’t think of anyone else.

And if the company has struggled in the years since a former leader left, then they need to think very carefully about why that is, and whether bringing the same person back is going to solve the problem.

Ultimately, boards need to consider leadership in the round, so that when their bounceback CEO leaves for the second time, the company has the culture and leadership pipeline to thrive without them.

Find the best candidate for your key leadership positions, whether they’re returners or making their first appearance at your door. Talk to us now about your executive search options.

Absolutely insightful read! 🌟 As Steve Jobs famously said, "Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower." Boards aiming for a triumphant comeback need to ensure the returning CEO blends familiarity with innovation, striking the perfect balance for growth. 🚀💼 #InnovationIsKey #LeadershipWisdom

Like
Reply
Timothy "Tim" Hughes 提姆·休斯 L.ISP

Should have Played Quidditch for England

11mo

Fascinating article Orlando Martins thank you, I think we are seeing this across many roles

Like
Reply
Orlando Martins

CEO at ORESA | Founder of Growth Index

11mo

There are so many factors to take into account. I think in some cases it is 💯 the right thing to do just not in every case. I should also qualify that in the case of someone like Jo Whitfield - the person returning is a fundamentally different leader to the one who left considering her exceptional career in between.

Like
Reply
Fabio Mazzotta

Region Head | Managing Director | Transformation Officer | Strategy consultant | Growth accelerator | Team builder | Business turnaround | Investor | Advisor

11mo

So true, thx for sharing Orlando. Companies play down too often the richness and the “out of the box” thinking that leaders from outside the industry can bring in terms of paradigm shift and creative solution seek. In the pursuit of short term fix, they go after “same ID” leaders, usually industry veterans, becoming first victims of seasoned and sometimes outdated strategies.

Steve Johnson

Launching an extra-ordinary service. For fashion brands and consumers.

11mo

Logical and deemed a ‘safe’ bet. However, I’m less convinced it’s the right answer. Time will tell. Key is bringing in a mindset to adapt at pace and to not only embrace innovation, but to invest in the right innovation. Sounds easy… ;0o

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Orlando Martins

Insights from the community

Explore topics