Written Contracts and Insurance - similarities

Written Contracts and Insurance - similarities

What is common between an insurance policy and a well drafted contract?

Written contracts can be viewed as a way to safeguard against future risks, much like an insurance policy.

Both contracts and insurance policies are mechanisms for allocating and managing risk between parties. In a written contract, the parties stipulate specific terms that determine how risks and liabilities will be handled after careful negotiation. Similarly, an insurance policy transfers the risk of potential losses from the insured to the insurer in specified cases (clarifying the inclusions and exclusions).

Just as insurance policies have exclusions and limitations on coverage, contracts also specify what is not covered or what the limitations of liability are for each party.

Contracts invariably contain indemnification clauses that require one party to compensate the other for certain losses or liabilities. This is analogous to the indemnity principle in insurance, where the insurer agrees to pay the insured no more than the actual loss suffered.

There is an exchange of value in both - in contracts this is the consideration (e.g. goods, services, money), while in insurance it is the premium paid by the insured to get the indemnity promise by the insurer.

Contracts and insurance policies often include clauses outlining how disputes will be resolved, whether through arbitration, mediation, or litigation. This provides a framework for addressing disagreements that may arise.

Contracts and insurance policies cannot get rid of uncertain events in future, but provide safeguard to the parties. For example, taking a life insurance policy doesn’t mean you have attained immortality, health insurance doesn’t guarantee good health, insuring valuables doesn’t safeguard against thefts. What it does is to secure the insured / family against the loss these risks pose, fully or at least partially. Similarly, a well negotiated and drafted contract reduces the risk of a dispute between the parties (if the terms are unambiguous) and provides a framework to resolve such disputes, if they are inevitable.

Contracts can thus be viewed as a form of "self-insurance" - they allow parties to proactively manage and mitigate risks through negotiated terms, much like an insurance policy. The key similarity is the use of a legally binding agreement to transfer and allocate risks between the involved parties.

#contract #contracts #lawyers #lawstudents #legalprofessionals

I literally breathe contracts. Follow me Bhumesh Verma for more.  

B R Sarma Rampalli

English language reviewer and editor

2mo

"Negotiated terms" aspect might be true in the case of contracts, but not so in insurance where every clause is decided in small and big print by the insurer and the insured has to sign it willy-nilly! Another key difference is: terms of the contract are, in majority of the instances, generally adhered to but in insurance, no claim, repeat no claim, is settled without raising a stink. I don't at all imply that claims will be settled AFTER raising a stink. No, they won't be.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics