Your Competitive Intelligence is Useless... Until You Use It
In the middle of September 1944, the Allies planned and executed the largest aerial invasion in history to capture a series of bridges in Nazi-occupied Holland, hoping to end the war by Christmas. If you know your WW2 history, "Operation Market Garden" was generally considered a failure, as the Allies suffered HEAVY HEAVY losses and could not capture and hold their final and most important objective, the bridge over the Rhine in Arnhem.
The main reason for the failure was that the Allies ignored critical intelligence collected from aerial reconnaissance, Ultra-intercepts, and the Dutch resistance indicating the presence of multiple armored Panzer divisions in the region. While valiant, the lightly armed and ill-supplied paratroopers that landed in Arnhem were no match for tanks!
With more and more organizations investing heavily in competitive intelligence teams and analysis, you think they would be eager to act on the analysis those teams provide. But like the Allies during Operation Market Garden, this intelligence is often collected, assessed at great expense, and then ultimately ignored!
Operation Market Garden serves as a case study for organizations about the importance of not just gathering accurate intelligence but actually using it!
Let's explore some of the reasons why intelligence is often ignored and what we can do to change it.
Lack of Trust
Decision-makers within organizations may lack trust in the accuracy or relevance of the intelligence gathered or even in the people creating and delivering it. They may have experienced misleading or unreliable information in the past, leading to skepticism and hesitation to act based on intelligence. Also, even though they invest heavily in competitive intelligence, they may only want information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs and strategies.
Solution:
Overconfidence
Overconfidence is like a blindfold that can keep you from seeing the next disruptor of your business. Remember Blockbuster? While they were focused on Hollywood video eating away at their market share, Netflix and other streaming platforms came along and TOTALLY disrupted their business model.
Solution:
Organizational Culture
Certain organizational cultures may discourage proactive decision-making or discourage challenging the status quo. This can create a reluctance to act on intelligence that may contradict established beliefs or disrupt existing processes.
Solution:
Recommended by LinkedIn
Inadequate Communication
Effective communication channels and processes are essential for disseminating intelligence throughout an organization. But like the "telephone game," if the intelligence is not effectively communicated to the relevant decision-makers or if the value and implications of the intelligence are not effectively conveyed, it can lead to inaction.
Solution:
Inertia and Risk Aversion
Just like people, organizations and businesses may be resistant to change and reluctant to take risks. Acting on intelligence often involves making strategic decisions that have potential risks and uncertainties. Fear of failure or negative consequences can lead to a preference for maintaining the status quo rather than acting on intelligence-driven insights.
Solution:
Resource Constraints
Acting on intelligence may require additional resources, whether financial, human, or technological. Organizations with limited resources may struggle to allocate the necessary resources to act on intelligence, especially if the perceived benefits or urgency of the intelligence is not fully understood and compelling enough.
Solution:
To close, I can't stress enough how important it is to remember that competitive intelligence is only as valuable as the actions it inspires. Businesses must not only invest in gathering and analyzing intelligence but also in creating an environment where it can be effectively used to inform strategic decisions.
Solutions Architect and IT Advisor, VMworld Distinguished Speaker, Competitive Marketing Expert
1yAnd it's worse than useless if competitive intelligence is institutionally disregard and discarded, as too often happens.