Nursery schools are putting GPs under pressure to prescribe antibiotics to infants with conjunctivitis when they are not needed, a study has revealed.
The study, published in the BJGP, found nine out of ten nursery schools have policies to exclude children with acute conjunctivitis, of which half specified a requirement for antibiotic treatment.
In addition, more than two out five GPs and nurse prescribers said they were influenced by these policies when it came to prescribing the topical antibiotics.
GP leaders said the schools’ policies undermined the hard work GPs were doing to cut down on unwarranted use of antibiotics, and called on public health chiefs to work with other organisations to make sure they brought them in line with current national guidelines.
Public Health England guidance states that children with acute infective conjunctivitis do not have to be excluded from school or nursery school, and do not necessarily need to be treated with antibiotics.
However, University of Birmingham researchers found that of 164 nursery schools across the UK, 142 (87%) had sickness policies that required children to be excluded.
Of these 81 (49%) stated that a child must be treated with antibiotics before being readmitted to nursery.
The team also found that out of 200 GPs and nurse prescribers who responded to a survey on the issue, 43% said childcare provider policies influenced their prescribing – and 25% said the policies were the main reason they had prescribed antibiotics.
The authors concluded: ‘Many GPs will be aware of this issue already but this research highlights the potential impact of clinically unjustifiable sickness exclusion practices.
‘Even though antibiotics are rarely clinically indicated for acute infective conjunctivitis, it is easy to see why clinicians may feel that a prescription is required.’
They added that the policies needed to be ‘influenced at a national level’.
Dr Maureen Baker, chair of the RCGP, said: ‘We would encourage closer working between health bodies, such as Public Health England and NICE, and childcare providers to develop more joined up policies, based in evidence, in the best interests of both individual patients and society at large.’
Dr Cliodna McNulty, head of the PHE primary care unit, said: ‘We would encourage GPs, nurses and pharmacists to do a thorough clinical assessment of the need for antibiotics before advising them, addressing the needs and concerns of parents or caters, and also give self-care and safety-netting advice. They should really try not to be influenced by local nursery policies.’
Br J Gen Pr 2016; available online 6 July
GP antibiotic prescribing under the microscope
The study comes as GPs are coming under ever intense scrutiny over antibiotic prescriptions. Most recently the Government announced that GPs would be tasked with cutting inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions by half – although the Department of Health was unclear exactly how many prescriptions this would amount to.
Having praised GPs with for their efforts in reducing the amount of antibiotics prescribed in primary care, NHS England recently set out new targets to cut back prescriptions further through the quality premium scheme.
NICE has also called for GPs who persistently over-prescribe antibiotics to be referred to the GMC, and a pilot scheme where the Chief Medical Officer wrote personal letters to GPs at high-prescribing practices was hailed as a success.
Despite the tough rhetoric, Public Health England’s own evidence has shown GPs are the most judicious prescribers of antibiotics in the NHS, while studies have highlighted the pressure that patients put on GPs to prescribe antibiotics, and researchers have reported that GPs at practices that do not give out antibiotics so easily are likely to receive lower patient satisfaction scores on the GP Patient Survey.
Visit Pulse Reference for details on 140 symptoms, including easily searchable symptoms and categories, offering you a free platform to check symptoms and receive potential diagnoses during consultations.
翻译：