1. Introduction
This Clean energy production is the ultimate vital problem in the 21st century [1] . The increasing worldwide energy appeal and significant concern about global warming due to the use of fossil fuels have encouraged the development of new technologies and energy carriers [2] . Among the various energy carrier systems, H2 is the well-known and cleanest energy carrier for the eco-friendly and green environment [3] . Numerous hydrogen production/storage systems, viz., metal/chemical hydrides [4] [5] , inorganic and organic nanotubes, [6] and metal-organic frameworks [7] , have been reported. In the past decades, non-innocent ligands have been well-known to act as organometallic catalysts and act in the biological framework [8] [9] . The exceptionally abnormal disproportionation reported in non-innocent ligands produces stable oxidizing and reducing agents during the two-electron procedure. For the reduction or oxidation, redox-active ligands have more actively accessible levels [10] . Contrastingly, earlier reports on proton, electron, or hydride shift in functional organic molecules [11] transition-metal complexes with bimolecular, [12] permitted us to unveil the molecular insights of a chemical reaction supported by proton/electron (H+/e−) transfer mechanism. These molecular systems might afford an option to extend novel multi-step H+/e– movement procedures and hence outcome in the generation of H2-storage/-evolution materials [13] . Peng et al. described the bond patterns of both o-benzoquinonediimine (bqdi) and semi-o-benzoquinonediimine (s-bqdi) based iron (II), cobalt(II) and cobalt(III) complexes, [FeII(bqdi)3](PF6)2, [CoII(s-bqdi)2] and CoIIICl(s-bqdi)2 [14] .
As shown in Scheme 1, the opda ligand coordinated with transition metal ions to produce the corresponding oxidized products,
o-diiminobenzosemiquinone(sbqdi) and o-diiminobenzoquinone(bqdi) through facile oxidation [14] . The free compounds can donate a total of two protons (2H+)
Scheme 1. H+ and e− pooling activity of opda complexes. The H, C, and N atoms are illustrated as white, gray, and blue spheres, correspondingly.
and two electrons (2e−) in various combinations. The oxidized form bqdi coordinated with transition metal Fe(II) and formed tris [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ complex. The same groups of researchers also reported the synthesis and crystallographic study of mixed-bpdi-opda ruthenium metal complex, [RuII(opda)2(bqdi)][PF6]2 [15] . They also reported the unsuccessful dissimilar protonation and oxidation states of Ru using metal-assisted ligand oxidation of [RuII(opda)(bqdi)2][PF6]2 to [Ru(bqdi)3]2+. Recently, Matsumoto and co-workers [16] reported the nonprecious-metal-assisted H2 production from redox active and non-innocent ligand o-phenylenediamine (opda) and its Fe(II) complexes. Very recent, they synthesized a low spin (ls) iron(II)-bqdi complex, ls- [FeII(bqdi)3][PF6]2, displaying photochemical hydrogen evolution(PHE) activity in the THF solvent at room temperature [17] . Such type of metal complexes may uncover functions with energy-related reactions like water splitting, hydrogen production and nitrogen fixation in a chemical process that need multiple proton and electron transfer [18] [19] [20] .
However, a systematic study on the first-row divalent transitions series forming tris complexes with bqdi ligand has not yet been reported. Therefore, based on this brief survey, the objective of this study was to investigate the geometries, binding strengths, band gap energy, charges, NBO analysis, and global reactivity descriptors analysis of the 3d transition series forming tris complexes with bqdi ligand [M(bqdi)3]2+ ([M = Ti2+ to Zn2+]) using density functional theory(DFT) at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,P) level. Specifically, to gain detailed insight into the Fe-bqdi-tris complex, [Fe(bqdi)3]2+, we systematically described the UV and frontier molecular orbitals (FMO).
2. Computational Details
Geometry optimization of the tris(o-phenylenediamine) M(II) (where M = Ti2+ to Zn2+) complexes were performed in THF using density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) [21] level of theory. The present simulations employed the Gaussian16 simulation package [22] and GaussView 6.0. were applied for the visualization of the optimized geometry. The geometry optimization was considered when the maximal atomic force was smaller than 0.00045 Hartree/Bohr and maximum displacement to threshold value 0.0018 Bohr respectively. No symmetry constraints were imposed for [M(bqdi)3]2+. The effects of solvent were considered by the conductor-like polarizable continuum solvation model (CPCM) [23] [24] . The LANL2DZ effective core potential (ECP) was employed for transition metal atoms and 6-311G(d,p) basis set employed for the other atoms. The lowest energy structures were found by checking normal mode coordinates and without negative frequency. Time-dependent (TD) DFT [25] calculations were executed using the optimized geometry to assess the vertical excitation energies of the equilibrium structures in THF, employing CAM-B3LYP [26] /6-311++G(d,p) level of theory along with long-range corrections. Using the following equation, the coordinated metal-ligand binding energies were calculated. The equation stated as in Equation (1) [27] [28] :
(1)
where the species Ecomplex, Emetal and Eligand denotes the energies of [M(bqdi)3]2+ (where M = Ti2+ to Zn2+) coordinated complexes, the metal ions and the ligand o-benzoquinodiimine(bqdi). Thus, the binding energy, ΔE states for per ligand. Each coordinated complex and ligand was optimized individually. Using NBO 3.1 software that included in the Gaussian program, electronic structures, the natural bond order (NBO), and global descriptors were calculated. For the electronic charges and main donor-acceptor interactions, NBO investigation was executed on the optimized structures. Charges on transition metals were calculated using different charge schemes.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Structural Analysis
The geometrical parameters of tris-[M(bqdi)3]2+ (M = Ti-Zn ion) complexes were calculated and summarized in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the optimized structures of the tris(bqdi) transition metal(II) complexes. The optimized geometry of each metal-complex is a distorted octahedron composed of three bidentate bqdi ligands. All the geometries of bqdi ligand-metal complexes are identical as [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ [14] , though the metal-Nitrogen(M-N(bqdi)) distances are faintly different (Table 1). The metals and nitrogen atoms were 1.960 to 2.270 Å apart on average. The Mn-N bond distances in studied complexes [Mn(bqdi)3]2+ were in the range of 2.270 - 2.273 Å and are quietly longer than the Fe-N distances in [Fe(bqdi)3]2+(1.957 - 1.958 Å). Peng et al. [14] reported the bond length of Fe-N in his X-ray geometry analyses of [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ (PF6)2 complex ranges from 1.906 - 1.925 Å. The average bond length of Fe-N in the tris bqdi complex was found 1.916 Å [29] . Matsmoto et al. found the bond distances
Table 1. Structural parameters of the present [M(bqdi)3]2+ coordinated complexes of a variety of metal ions.
Figure 1. Optimized geometry of the tris-(o-benzoquinonediimine) M2+ (where M2+ = Ti2+ to Zn2+) complex.
of Fe-N ranges from 1.919 - 1.931 Å of the [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ complex [15] . The distances of the M-N in the other tris-o-benzoquinonediimine(bqdi) complexes are slightly higher than those of [Fe(bqdi)3]2+, 2.076 - 2.078 Å for [Ti(bqdi)3]2+, 2.075 - 2.076 Å for [V(bqdi)3]2+, 2.003 - 2.085 Å for [Cr(bqdi)3]2+, 2.149 - 2.191 Å for [Co(bqdi)3]2+, 2.047 - 2.416 Å for [Cu(bqdi)3]2+ and 2.219 - 2.221 Å for [Zn(bqdi)3]2+ complexes, respectively. The calculated metal-nitrogen (M-N) distances of these complexes are correlated with the binding strengths of the complexes.
In this work, the calculated N-Fe-N bond angle was predominantly bigger than the preceding X-ray crystal structure, 81.26˚ [14] . Moreover, Figure 1 also illustrates the trigonally distorted octahedral coordination geometry with the central iron atom. The ‘bites’ found from o-benzoquinonediimine (bqdi) ligands are pronounced and imposed in such a way that the N-Fe-N angles are compacted starting from 90.0˚ to 79.55˚. The extremely tiny Fe-N distances (av. 1.960 Å) specify incredibly strong binding, related iron with low-spin and the bqdi ligand. The geometry of the o-benzoquinonediimine(bqdi) ligand is planar. The six C=N bonds (av. l.300 Å) and their six C=C conjugated bonds (av. 1.354 Å) are small, consistent with their recognition as localized double bonds. Kapovsky et al. [9] found the calculated C=C bonds of 1.357 Å. The lingering twelve C-C bonds lengths (~1.445 Å) are only faintly smaller than of the C-C single bonds found in cyclooctatetraene (1.46 A). The calculated bonds types of the bqdi ligand in this complex is extremely fastened to those in [FeII-(CN),(bqdi)]2− [29] , [RuII(bqdi)(bipy)]2+ [30] and have greatly more localized character than that in [Ni(s-bqdi)2] [31] .
The bond prototype of the o-benzoquinonediimine(bqdi) moiety is also alike in every of the afore mentioned complexes and has additional delocalized double bonds than the neutral or pure o-benzoquinonediimine(bqdi) ligand complex.
3.2. Binding Energy Analysis
In this work, we systematically explored the binding energies, ΔE’s, enthalpies (ΔH), and Gibbs free energies (ΔG) of the first-row divalent transition metal ions. The binding energies (ΔE), enthalpies, and Gibbs free energies of tris [M(bqdi)3]2+ (where M = Ti-Zn) complexes with different spin states were computed and tabulated in Table 2. The negative binding energies (ΔE) are interrelated with the permanence of the analogous complexes. This explicates that the durability of the complexes in the THF solvent accelerated with the escalating supreme binding energy. Electronic energies are only integrated for the estimation of the above ΔE’s binding energies. Since metal-lgand bindings are covalent in nature, hence, the vibrational, thermal, and entropic contributions to ΔE rigged up to be trivial. The calculated binding energies trend is a little bit different due to the stability of the complexes with different spin states. In this study, Fe2+ with bqdi ligand-complexes with lower spin is highly stable than other spins of Fe2+ [15] .
Figure 2 shows double-humped peculiarity in the metal-ligand binding energy versus metals nuclear charges. Because of the increased electronic interaction, on the whole, increases by mounting nuclear charge. Due to Jahn-Teller distortion, the ΔE decreases from V to Cr complexes [32] . The dip in view in favor of Mn was attributed due to the d5 electronic configuration of Mn(II).The charge transfer from ligand-to-metal is inadequate, due to the occupancy of all d orbitals, resulting in a reduced ΔE. The Zn(II), which has a d10 electronic configuration has also shown inefficiency. Hence, this is comparatively little for Zn(II). The double-humped characteristics are alike to that observed for the hexaaqua complexes [33] . Note that the present calculated ΔE’s of this study has two peaks located at V and Cu. The two peaks arise due to the high ligand field stabilization in favor of the d3 and d9 configuration of high spin complexes.
Following the current ΔE’s, Fe(II) is not predominantly strong compared to
Figure 2. The calculated binding energies of the transition metals coordinated with bqdi ligand. Without imposing the octahedral symmetry, the per ligand binding energy, ∆E was computed for each coordination complex.
other metal ions considered in coordination with the bqdi ligand. Thus, the strong binding of the bqdi ligand examined in presence of Fe(II) should originate from the other factors. The Fe(II) with ls (low spin) state is superior to the hs state by 3.28 kcal∙mol−1 (Table 2). Considering the energy, it is screened for the permanence of the complex acceleration in the array of ls >hs. By evaluating binding energies, it was concluded that Fe(II) at ls state was the best choice to form the tris [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ complex. Following the Boys-Bernardi counterpoise (CP) [34] corrected method, it has confirmed the basis set superposition error (BSSE) in support of the tris [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ complex with the low spin state only. The corrected BSSE energy
(−1148.47 au) was weighed against the uncorrected energy
(−1730.06 au). The comparative digression is defined
as
The calculated BSSE energy was within 0.012% which was the range of computational error.
The electronic energies are only included here to calculate the binding energies. Since the binding of metal-ligand is covalent in nature, the vibrational,
Table 2. The calculated metal-ligand binding energies, enthalpies and Gibbs free energies of the present [MII(bqdi)3]2+ coordinated complexes.
thermal and entropic contributions are evicted to be minute. Furthermore, the computed binding enthalpy (
) and Gibbs free energy (
) of coordination show that the interactions between the ligand bqdi and Fe(II) ion at low spin are higher compared to the high spin and intermediate spin. It is noticed that the complex with the same ligand bqdi low spin complex of Fe(II) is more stable compared to the high spin state. Apart from metal ions, the ZPE-, thermal-energy-, enthalpy-, and Gibbs free energy corrected ΔE’s were all indoors 6% of the inaccurate binding energies.
3.3. Spectroscopic Data
The absorption spectrum of the complex [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ was computed using the optimized minimum energy geometry. The calculated UV-Vis absorption spectrum of the complex was illustrated in Figure 3. All the calculated wavelengths, oscillatory strengths, and excitation energies of the complex were presented in Table 3. In the spectrum, two strong main bands were observed at 370 nm and 452 nm respectively. The maximum absorption band was located at 452.49 nm, supported by the theoretical calculations of Matsumoto et al. of the Fe2+ complex with bqdi ligand [15] . The theoretical wavelength of the considered structure is supported through the experimentally measured wavelengths at 460 and 635 nm originating as of tris complex of [Fe2+(Ph2TIP)(tBuDIBQ)]2+ (4ox), their o-diiminobenzoquinone ligand is denoted as DIBQ [35] .
The molecular orbitals (MOs) were made known enlarging beginning MO-2 (HOMO-2) to MO+2 (LUMO+2) in Figure 4 to demonstrate the electronic transitions. The transitions from HOMO-1 to LUMO arose mostly at 452.49 nm. In the HOMO, the density of electrons is mostly disseminated on top of the three bqdi ligands and metal ions but in HOMO-1 mostly covered over the three bqdi ligands. The formation of HOMO-1 orbital is principally owing to 52.78% involvement in the Fe2+ iron. The density of electrons has mostly disappeared
Figure 3. UV-vis absorption spectra of the tris-(o-benzoquinonediimine)-Fe2+ complex obtained of the present calculation.
Table 3. Vertical excitation energies (in eV), wavelengths (in nm), and oscillator strengths (f) of selected transitions for present [Fe(bqdi)3]2+ coordinated complexes in THF obtained by TD-DFT(CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)).
Figure 4. The Frontier MOs of tris-(o-benzoquinonediimine)-Fe2+ complex. The H, C, and N atoms are illustrated as white, gray, and blue spheres, correspondingly. The orbital lobes presented here in green and red stand for the opposite phases.
from the bqdi ligand from the Fe2+ ion in the LUMO orbital presented in Figure 4. Hence, in the UV-vis spectrum, the strongest peak was formed evidently due to charge transfer from ligand-to-metal (L → M). The orbital LUMO+1 presented here have a similar pattern primary to the major contribution of nitrogen, nearly 52.8% contributions for the construction of LUMO+1 orbital. From Figure 4, it is demonstrated that the HOMO is created from the charge transfer of ligand-to-metal and disported over that three bqdi ligands. The metal ion contributed simply 8.1% electron density during complex formation. The peaks positioned at 370 nm and 452.49 nm arose mostly from the transition from HOMO-3 to LUMO+1 and HOMO-1 to LUMO. The peak located at 452.29 nm arose from the transition of HOMO-2 to LUMO. The HOMO-1 and the HOMO-2 look alike since the electron density is widespread over all the bqdi ligands but reduced a little bit in one ligand. The orbital LUMO+1 is similar to that of the orbital LUMO because the electron density is enclosed surrounding the metal-nitrogen interaction area. The difference between LUMO and LUMO+1 is that LUMO+1 does not have any π character like that of LUMO orbital.
3.4. Atomic Charges
In this study, the charges of metal ions were systematically verified and summarized in Table 4. For the estimation of charges on metal ions, five different charge schemes were applied. The schemes natural population analysis (NPA) [36] , Merz-Singh-Kollmann (MK) [37] , CHelpG [38] , CHelp [39] , and HLYGAt [40] were used. The charges on metal ions are assorted from various charge schemes. For example, the charge on Fe at NPA is 1.040, while the charge 0.906 was estimated when the charging scheme MK was applied. Usually, the atomic charges decrease through expanding nuclear charges. The charges on Ti(II) ions with different charge schemes are always higher compared to other metal ions. It is noticed that the charges on Fe(II) ions are not any significant changes with different charge schemes. Regardless, the current trend of atomic charge drifts significantly through homogeneous decline by escalating nuclear charge, found
Table 4. Atomic charges on metals calculated using different charge schemes, NPA, MK, CHelpG, CHelp and HLYGAt.
in the cross-linking of mussel adhesive proteins [41] . The continuous decrease was ascribed due to the improvement of metal-nitrogen covalent type bond (thus, the improvement of charge relocation from ligand to metal). The geometries studied here, though the calculated atomic charge was found to be a nominal quantity for Cu, despite the charging scheme, and the charge of the atom amplified from time to time by mounting nuclear charge. Such as maximum charge schemes provided an escalating atomic charge starting Cu to Zn.
3.5. NBO Analysis
The natural bond orbitals (NBO) [42] were achieved by applying the NBO 3.1 program executed in Gaussian 16 to compute the energy Eigen values of the frontier molecular orbital (ΔELUMO − ∆EHOMO) energies. The NBO studies supply information roughly about the electronic structure of a complex. The deviation of a molecule from the Lewis structure was reported by the interactions of occupied and vacant orbitals and hence the pertinent energies can be utilized as a gauge of structural stability.
Using second-order perturbation theory analysis, the donor-acceptor interactions strength is calculated [43] . The second-order perturbation energy, through the delocalization of each donor NBO (i) and acceptor NBO (j) was estimated as follows (Equation (2)).
(2)
In this equation, q stands for the donor orbital occupancy,
and
are NBO orbital strengths, and
is the off-diagonal element of the NBO Fock-matrix. The inter-molecular orbital interactions increase with the greater values of interaction energy
. Thus greater charge transfer occurred among the donors’ and acceptors that guided the steadiness of the metal-ligand complex.
The second-order perturbation energies
were evaluated and represented the major strong interactions in Table 5. The most effective and vital energies
Table 5. Calculated interactions energy
(kcal∙mol−1) of the present [M(bqdi)3]2+ coordinated geometries in solution phase at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory.
are linked between the interactions of the lone pair electrons (nitrogen atom) of the ligand (LPN) and metal anti bonding orbital (LP*M). A significant interaction between donor-acceptor specified a higher subsequent value and a pronounced charge transfer through ligand (nitrogen atom) to metal (acceptor). As in Table 5, the computed value for the [M(bqdi)3]2+ complexes decreases from Ti to Mn (282.48 to 68.27 kJ∙mol−1) and again increases from Fe to Zn (92.72 - 153.19 kJ∙mol−1) respectively. This supports the effective and vital interaction of the bqdi ligand towards metal ions to be exactly the energy investigation. Evaluating the calculated values of ΔEbind (Table 2) and interaction energy (Table 5) illustrate a correlation suggesting the increment of ΔEbind follows the increment of interactions.
3.6. Global Reactivity Descriptors
The information on global reactivity descriptors like band gap (HOMO-LUMO), ionization potential, electron affinity and chemical hardness are very important information for the stability of a complex and are estimated using DFT/B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory. Based on band gap energy (HOMO-LUMO), molecules are classified as hard and soft. Due to the small band gap, soft molecules are more polarizable and have a smaller energy of excitation compared to hard one. The HOMO and LUMO energies were used to calculate
the ionization potential (I) and electron affinity (A) through the following equations;
and
. Using
and
equations, electronegativity and chemical hardness are computed. The negative of electronegativity (
) and inverse of hardness,
were used to
calculate the chemical potential and global softness. Global electrophility index ω was derived using the electronic potential, μ and chemical hardness η by the following Equation (3):
(3)
The computed global reactivity descriptors are summarized in Table 6. In these computations tris [M(bqdi)3]2+ complexes of Ti to Zn are considered. The ionization potential and electron affinity is selected as an inverse of HOMO and an inverse of LUMO respectively. The computed ionization potential results of the complexes from [M(bqdi)3]2+ (where M=Ti to Zn) were estimated 8.00, 8.05, 7.16, 7.97, 7.18, 7.92,7.97, 7.92 and 8.00 eV with electron affinity values from 5.44, 5.22, 5.47, 4.82, 5.01, 4.65, 4.65, 4.87 and 4.71 eV respectively. The calculated electronegativity and chemical potential of the studied complexes are 6.72, 6.64, 6.32, 6.40, 6.09, 6.29, 6.31, 6.40 and 6.36 eV from Ti to Zn complexes, respectively. The highest electronegativity values are observed of Ti and V complexes as Ti to Zn complexes the ionization potential increases from Ti to V and increase from Fe to Zn. Moreover, the natural stability and reactivity depends on
Table 6. Global reactivity descriptors of the present [M(bqdi)3]2+ geometries in solution phase(THF) at DFT/B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory.
the global softness of the system. The calculated results of the global softness of bqdi ligand with Ti to Zn divalent metal ion complexes are 0.39, 0.35, 0.59, 0.31, 0.46, 0.31, 0.30, 0.33 and 0.31 eV−1, respectively. The low values of global softness as well as the high values of chemical hardness are suggesting the stability of the systems in nature having a minimum reactivity.
Electrophilicity indices of the studied complexes are also estimated at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of DFT. The computed values of the electrophilic index of these complexes are 17.64, 15.52, 23.50, 12.96, 17.01, 12.06, 11.99, 13.39 and 12.26 eV respectively. Similarly, the higher global hardness and small global softness recommended the systems to be quite stable in nature with minimum reactivity.
On the other hand, electron affinity fluctuates from Ti to Fe and from Fe gradually decreases up to Zn. The decrease in the chemical hardness will lead to an increase in chemical stability of the system. The computed trend of ΔEHOMO-LUMO gaps is indicating the chemical stability of the system, i.e.; the greater ΔEHOMO–LUMO gap furnishes fewer possibilities for electron excitation and makes the structure less reactive. A trend of lessening in the electronic chemical potential of complexes from Ti to Zn is viewed, which increases the stability.
4. Conclusion
The present work theoretically describes the comparative structural properties of first-row divalent transition metal complexes of tris-(o-benzoquinonediimine) ligands. The binding strengths, band gap energy, charges, NBO interaction strengths, and global reactivity descriptors analysis were calculated using DFT B3LYP/6-311G(d,P) level of theory. The metal-ligand binding energy is one of the main molecular foundations underlying coordination between metal and bqdi ligands. The present results indicated the most probable way to activate organic moieties supported with first-row divalent transition metal ions. The present results also suggested that the binding strength of Fe(II) having a low spin state is insufficient to form stable complexes with ligand bqdi. The calculated values were in good agreement with previous experimental results. This result will serve for dynamics of the coordination modeling of such ligand systems in future study.
Acknowledgements
Financial support of this work by the Centre for Advanced Research in Sciences (CARS), University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh, is greatly acknowledged.