1. INTRODUCTION
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a psychiatric diagnosis that describes a category of mood disorders defined by the presence of one or more episodes of abnormally elevated energy levels, cognition, and mood with or without one or more depressive episodes. The elevated moods are clinically referred to as mania that can sometimes lead to such psychotic symptoms as delusions and hallucinations (DSM-IV-TR, American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Adenosine system has been involved in maniac symptoms and in particular in kindling phenomena that are a valuable model to explain the pathological activation, increase of energy and recurrence of maniac episodes [1]. The role of adenosine in the control of mood in BD stems from different lines of evidences: 1) during kindling phenomena adenosine is released and in several animal models it has been demonstrated that the use of adenosine agonists may have anti-kindling properties [2]; 2) caffeine, that is a non-selective antagonist for both A1 and A2A adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes, has a mania-like stimulant effects worsening the course of seasonal BD, causing a persistent state of arousal and an exacerbation of maniac symptoms [3-6]; 3) in BD an increase in purinergic turnover has been described [7] and the use of xantine-oxidase inhibitors as anti-maniac agents have been suggested [8,9].
The involvement of adenosine in the control of maniac behaviour first arose based on its tight interaction with dopamine systems [10-13]. The functional and structural interaction between A2A ARs and D2 dopamine receptors (D2 DRs) have been yet demonstrated since several years. By the means of different methodological approaches, such as co-immunoprecipitation, FRET/BRET [14,15], biochemical and microdyalisis techniques, the existence of A2A AR-D2 DR heterodimers and higher order receptor heteromers, called receptor mosaics, in the striatopallidal GABA neurons [13,16] has been demonstrated. These heteromers control the excitability of GABAergic neurons counteracting D2 DR signalling at multiple effectors [17].
The functional cross-talk between adenosine and dopamine receptors may have important pathophysiological and therapeutic implications in psychiatric diseases associated to dopaminergic dysfunction. The dissection of the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of A2A AR expression and functioning represent a crucial aspect in further clarifying the pathophysiological role of adenosine in psychiatric diseases and should be taken into account (1) in developing new drugs as well as (2) in preventing possible side effects of drugs indirectly modulating the adenosine system.
Recently, we have demonstrated both in transfected cell lines [18] and in platelets of patients with BD [19], that typical antipsychotic drugs, acting as D2 DR antagonists, modulated A2A AR functional responsiveness, suggesting A2A AR agonists as a possible target, in association with D2 antagonists, in the therapeutic treatment of BD. Based on these results we evaluated the effect of different doses of typical drugs on A2A AR binding parameters in order to identify a possible correlation between the modulation of A2A receptor activity and the degree of D2 receptor blockade also in relation to the severity of illness and the effectiveness of individual therapy. These results allowed us to identify A2A AR as a peripheral marker of D2 DR occupancy and of the therapeutic effectiveness of typical drugs.
2. METHODS
2.1. Study Sample
Twenty-four patients affected by BD with psychotic symptoms were recruited from the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. All patients were treated with typical antipsychotic drugs for at least six months. The patients received doses of antipsychotic therapy between 20 to 900 mg/day equivalent of chlorpromazine. The patients met the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) for BD and were between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Subjects who were pregnant or had unstable medical conditions were excluded. All of the patients gave their informed consent to participate in the study. The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1996), and with the Guidelines of the Good Clinical Practice (1995). The control group included 32 healthy volunteers with no history of mental disorders, alcoholism or drug abuse, and with no medical illnesses, as determined by clinical interviews.
2.2. Clinical Assessments
The severity of illness of each patient was evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) [20]. The level of symptoms during the week preceding discharge was assessed using the 18-item version of the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) [21]. Clinical information was collected directly from the patients and from at least one close relative as a co-informant. Medical health was documented by reviewing the medical history and through a physical examination. Three resident psychiatrists with clinical research experience performed the diagnostic and psychopathological assessments. Two senior psychiatrists (LDO and AC) who were not directly involved in the assessments confirmed the diagnoses.
2.3. Materials
Labelled and unlabelled-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl) [1,2,4] triazolo [2,3-a] [1,3,5] triazine-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM241385) were from Tocris Cookson (UK). All other chemicals were supplied by standard commercial sources.
2.4. Platelet Isolation
Blood samples (30 ml) from healthy volunteers and patients were collected in sodium citrate anticoagulant (1:6 dilution, 2.2% sodium-citrate, and 1.2% citric acid), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained by low-speed centrifugation at 200 × g for 20 min at room temperature. The PRP was then centrifuged at 2000 × g for 15 min at room temperature to precipitate platelets. The platelets were then washed once in 40 - 50 ml of an ice-cold physiological saline solution (isotonic, 0.9% NaCl) and pelleted at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4˚C.
2.5. Preparation of Platelet Membrane Suspensions
Platelet membranes were prepared from 32 healthy volunteers and 24 patients as previously described [19,22]. Briefly, platelets were suspended in Tris-buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl; pH 7.4 at 4˚C) and centrifuged at 17,500 × g for 15 min at 25˚C. The washed platelets were suspended in ice-cold hypotonic buffer B (5 mM Tris-HCl, and 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 at 4˚C) and homogenized with a Polytron for 30 second before centrifugation at 35,000 × g for 15 min at 4˚C. The resulting pellet was re-suspended in membrane buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.8 mM EDTA, 0.16 mg/ml benzamidine, 0.2 mg/ml bacitracine, and 0.02 mg/ml tripsin inhibitor), rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80˚C until it was used.
2.6. [3H] ZM241385 Binding Assay
A2A AR equilibrium binding parameters were determined by saturation binding studies using the selective A2A AR antagonist [3H]ZM241385 [19]. Saturation binding experiments were performed incubating platelet membranes (50 μg) in binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, and 0.8 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) in the presence of five different [3H] ZM241385 concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 10 nM at 4˚C for 1 h. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of 1 μM unlabelled ZM241385.
2.7. Data Analysis and Statistic
Scatchard analysis of radioligand saturation binding data was performed using the non-linear multipurpose curvefitting computer program Graph-Pad Prism (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Since Kd and Bmax values are not normally distributed, all of the statistical analyses were conducted on their logarithmic transformations. To compare the mean levels of these variables in control vs. patient independent samples, the Student’s t test was utilized. A p-value of <0.05 was judged as statistically significant. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Linear regression analyses and bivariate Pearson’s correlation coefficients were performed in order to evaluate the relationships between the Kd values and the chlorpromazine equivalent of drug in relation to patient characteristics (severity of illness, total PBRS and factor scores).
All of the analyses were carried out using SPSS, version 14.0, by means of personal computers.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Clinical Characteristics of BD Patients
No gender differences were found between the control (male: 81.3%) and BD patient (male: 83.3%) groups.
The mean BPRS total scores ± SD by the patients was 48.46 ± 15.77, while the score of each factor was the following: anxiety-depression (ANDP) = 3.27 ± 1.28, anergia (ANER) = 1.50 ± 0.67, thought disturbance (THOT) = 2.52 ± 1.73, activation (ACTV) = 3.54 ± 1.72, and hostile suspiciousness (HOST) = 2.80 ± 1.67.
3.2. A2A AR Equilibrium Binding Parameters in Platelets from BD Patients under Treatment with Typical Antipsychotics
The A2A AR equilibrium binding parameters were evaluated in human platelets from healthy volunteers, (N = 32) and patients with BD (N = 24) under chronic treatment with typical antipsychotics. Scatchard analysis of the [3H] ZM241385 saturation binding data demonstrated that in control platelets, the radioligand bound a homogenous population of binding sites with an affinity constant value (Kd) and a maximum density of binding sites (Bmax) of 4.59 ± 1.79 nM (Figure 1 (a)) and 244.97 ± 76.93 fmol/mg proteins (Figure 1 (b)), respectively. To evaluate the effect of antipsychotic treatment on the A2A AR binding parameters, [3H]ZM241385 saturation analysis was performed on platelet membranes obtained from 24 BD patients treated with typical antipsychotic drugs for at least six months. In BD patients, [3H]ZM241385 bound a homogeneous population of binding sites with a Kd and Bmax value of 1.90 ± 1.39 nM (Figure 1 (a)) and 270.22 ± 150.94 fmol/mg of proteins (Figure 1 (b)), respectively.
As shown in Table 1, a significant difference in the Kd values between the control and patient groups was observed. On the contrary, in BD patients treated with typical antipsychotics, no significant differences in the Bmax value were observed with respect to controls.
To evaluate if the variability in the Kd of the A2A AR parameters observed in the BD patients was related to the dosage of the administered typical antipsychotic, statistical correlation analyses were performed. Considering the whole group of patients, no significant correlations were detected between the Kd values and the equivalent of chlorpromazine, and between the Kd and the clinical
(a)(b)
Figure 1. The figures display individual results for the [3H] ZM241385 Kd (A) and Bmax (B) values obtained in platelets from healthy volunteers (controls; N = 32) and BD patients (N = 24). The horizontal lines represent the mean values ± SEM from healthy volunteers and patients.
Table 1. Comparison between the mean levels of Ln Kd and Ln Bmax in the controls (a) vs BD patients; (b) Student’s t test.
patient characteristics (CGI, total BPRS scores and factor scores).
Nevertheless, after subdividing the patients into two groups on the basis of the severity of illness (CGI ≤ 4: moderate ill; CGI > 4: severe ill), a significant negative correlation between the A2A AR Kd values and the equivalent of chlorpromazine dose was detected only in the group of patients with moderate illness (see Table 2).
Moreover, a negative correlation between the A2A AR Kd values and the equivalent of chlorpromazine dose was detected after subdividing the patients into two groups on the basis of the median of total BPRS scores and the
Table 2. The Bivariate Pearson’s correlation between the A2A AR Kd values and the equivalent of chlorpromazine in two groups of BD patients with moderate and severe psychotic disturbance, respectively.
median of factor III (THOT) and factor V (OST) BPRS scores (see Table 2).
In the relative scattergrams (Figure 2), we can observe the different slopes of the straight-line for moderate and severe psychotic disturbances.
4. DISCUSSION
In this work, we demonstrated that typical antipsychotic drugs, acting as D2 DR antagonists, selectively affected the A2A AR affinity constant value in human platelets of BD patients under chronic treatment with these drugs. The main finding of these data is that administered typical drugs induced a reduction in A2A AR Kd values in a dose-dependent-manner, demonstrating the existence of a correlation between D2 DR occupancy and A2A AR regulation induced by the dopamine system.
Although blocking of the D2 DR remains central to the therapeutic properties of antipsychotics, these drugs appear to act by mechanisms involving other neurotransmitter systems, including serotonin and adenosine [23,24]. The involvement of the adenosine system and of the A2A ARs in psychiatric diseases [12,25-28], including BD [3-6] has been demonstrated and it has been related to a functional cross-talk with the dopaminergic system, in particular with the D2 DRs. D2 DRs are highly expressed in striatopallidal neurons, where they co-localize with adenosine A2A ARs [29], presumably forming functional heterodimers in which adenosine and dopamine receptors mutually regulate their responses [14,15,30-33].
In a previous work [19], we demonstrated that typical antipsychotics, but not atypical ones, induced an up-regulation of A2A AR expression and functional response in the platelets of BD patients. We demonstrated in particular that: 1) A2A and D2 receptors are co-expressed in platelets and interact to form functional heterodimers in which the response of one receptor may be modulated by the selective block of the other, and 2) typical and atypical antipsychotics, which show a different mechanism of action at the molecular level, may differently control the functional regulation of A2A AR. A crucial point that distinguishes different classes of antipsychotics is the degree of dopamine D2 DR occupancy and the kinetics of drug receptor-dissociation, on which the drug response and some unpleasant side effects depend. Typical antipsychotics, such us haloperidol, have a high D2 DR occupancy and slow dissociation rates that are likely connected to the extrapyramidal side effects [34,35] of these drugs.
On the contrary, clozapine, an atypical drug, shows a much lower occupancy and a fast dissociation rate; this may explain its freedom from extrapyramidal side effects [36,37]. These differences in the activity profiles of the two antipsychotic classes may be at the root of the specific effects observed in the A2A regulatory mechanisms.
In order to investigate whether A2A AR could be used as a marker of D2 receptor occupancy in relation to therapy efficacy, we aimed to evaluate the regulation of A2A AR that is induced by different doses of typical drugs. The study was performed by assessing A2A AR equilibrium-binding parameters in the platelets of patients affected by bipolar disorders, all under the treatment of typical drugs for at least six months.
The results confirmed that in BD patients, a reduction in A2A AR Kd values had occurred, demonstrating that the typical antipsychotics affected A2A AR ligand affinity by increasing its functional activity. On the contrary, with respect to the previous work, increasing the number of patient groups resulted in no significant differences in the maximal density of A2A AR binding sites. These results suggest that the block of the D2 receptor mainly affects the A2A AR conformational state rather than its total number. These data have been also confirmed in a model of CHO cells co-transfected with both A2A and D2 receptors [18]. Statistical analyses were also performed in order to evaluate the existence of a correlation between the changes in the A2A Kd values and the drug doses, expressed as an equivalent of chlorpromazine. Interestingly we demonstrated that in the BD patient groups that there was no statistically significant correlation between the A2A AR Kd values and the equivalent of chlorpromazine. Additionally, when the patients were grouped on the basis of severity of illness as “moderate illness” (CGI value ≤ 4) and “severe illness” (CGI > 4), a significant negative correlation between the two parameters was detected only in the moderate illness group of the patients. On the other hand, this correlation was lost in the group of patients with a high severity of illness. Moreover, the same results were obtained when the patients were grouped on the basis of the median of total BPRS scores, and the median of two BPRS factor scores, and in particular the factor III (Thought disturbance) and the factor V (Hostile suspiciousness). These BPRS factors are the main representative of psychotic symptoms. In detail, factor III includes four items: conceptual disorganization, grandiosity, hallucinatory behaviour and unusual thought content. Factor V includes three items: hostility, suspiciousness and uncooperativeness, all symptoms of psychotic behaviour. Our results can then suggest that the regulation of A2A AR in response to antipsychotics may be a new marker for monitoring therapy efficacy, and particularly in relation to psychotic symptoms. In addition, the results suggest that the degree of the D2 receptor block may have an important role in the A2A AR regulatory mechanisms only in responder patients with respect to non-responder patients. The lack of A2A-D2 cross-regulation in non-responder patients could be explained by the idea that in non-responder patients an alteration of the dopaminergic system response had occurred. This hypothesis may be supported by the primary persistence of negative symptoms in these patients. Furthermore, it is also likely that the impairment of the responsiveness of the dopamine receptor caused, in turn, an alteration in the cross-regulation between adenosine and dopamine receptors. To dissect this issue a direct monitoring of D2 receptor occupancy and of D2 receptor functional responsiveness in non-responder vs responder patients should be evaluated. Unfortunately, the evaluation of receptor D2 occupancy is not detectable by radioligand binding in peripheral human blood cells that express the receptors at low levels. In fact, all of the studies aimed to assess the degree of D2 receptor occupancy following antipsychotic administration have been performed in animal models [38] or in the human brain using PET/SPECT technology [39-42]. In this context, since D2 receptor occupancy has been identified as an important aspect for individual therapeutic responsiveness and for the appearance of side effects, the A2A AR binding parameters, which are quantifiable in human platelets, may represent an indirect index to evaluate the degree of D2 receptor occupancy for individual patients. This may be a useful means to seek therapy for maximum effectiveness and fewer side effects.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by a grant funded by the Monte dei Paschi di Siena Foundation. The Foundation had no further role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, the writing of the report or the decision to submit the paper for publication.
We thank the PhD student Anna Panighini for the supporting in data elaboration.
NOTES