[1]
|
K. Choi and Y. Lu, “A Note on Endogenous Timing with Strategic Delegation: Unilateral Externality Case,” Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 64, No. 2, 1983, pp. 253-264. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8586.2011.00392.x
|
[2]
|
L. Cabral and W. R. Majure, “An Empirical Analysis of Bank Branching: Portugal 1989-1991,” In: D. Neven and L.-H. Roller, Eds., The Empirical Analysis of Industrial Organization, CEPR, London, 1994.
|
[3]
|
J. I. Bulow, J. D. Geanakoplos and P. D. Klemperer, “Holding Idle Capacity to Deter Entry,” Economic Journal, Vol. 95, No. 377, 1985, pp. 178-182.
doi:10.2307/2233477
|
[4]
|
J. I. Bulow, J. D. Geanakoplos and P. D. Klemperer, “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, No. 3, 1985, pp. 488-511. doi:10.1086/261312
|
[5]
|
M. M. Tombak, “Strategic Asymmetry,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2006, pp. 339-350. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2004.11.014
|
[6]
|
C. Fershtman and K. Judd, “Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly,” American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 5, 1987, pp. 927-940.
|
[7]
|
S. D. Sklivas, “The Strategic Choice of Management Incentives,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, 1987, pp. 452-458. doi:10.2307/2555609
|
[8]
|
J. Vickers, “Delegation and the Theory of the Firm,” Economic Journal, Vol. 95, No. 380a, 1985, pp. 138-147.
doi:10.2307/2232877
|
[9]
|
X. Vives, “Commitment, Flexibility, and Market Outcomes,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1986, pp. 217-229.
doi:10.1016/0167-7187(86)90032-9
|
[10]
|
H. Ogawa, “Capacity Choice in the Mixed Duopoly with Product Differentiation,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1-6.
|
[11]
|
J. C. Bárcena-Ruiz and M. B. Garzón, “Capacity Choice in a Mixed Duopoly under Price Competition,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 26, 2007, pp. 1-7.
|
[12]
|
Y. Tomaru, Y. Nakamura and M. Saito, “Capacity Choice in a Mixed Duopoly with Managerial Delegation,” Economics Bulletin, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2009, pp. 1904-1924.
|
[13]
|
Y. Nakamura and M. Saito, “Capacity Choice in a Price-Setting Mixed Duopoly: The Relative Performance Approach,” Modern Economy, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2013, pp. 273-280. doi:10.4236/me.2013.44031
|
[14]
|
Y. Nakamura and M. Saito, “Capacity Choice in a Mixed Duopoly: The Relative Performance Approach,” Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013, pp. 124-133. doi:10.4236/tel.2013.32020
|
[15]
|
Y. Nakamura, “Capacity Choice in a Price-Setting Mixed Duopoly with Network Effects,” Modern Economy, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2013, pp. 418-425. doi:10.4236/me.2013.45044
|
[16]
|
T. Jansen, A. V. Lier and A. V. Witteloostruijn, “A Note on Strategic Delegation: The Market Share Case,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2007, pp. 531-539. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.04.017
|
[17]
|
N. Miller and A. Pazgal, “The Equivalence of Price and Quantity Competition with Delegation,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2001, pp. 284-301.
doi:10.2307/2696410
|
[18]
|
N. Miller and A. Pazgal, “Relative Performance as a Strategic Commitment Mechanism,” Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2002, pp. 51-68.
doi:10.1002/mde.1045
|